[Mailman-Users] name 'nan' is not defined

[Stefan Waidele jun.]

Hi,

we are running some small lists using Mailman 2.15, with the fix 
described in http://www.list.org/security.html

It has been quite a while since we applied that fix, and things 
continued to run smoothly.

Everything was fine, until two days ago, delivery stopped. Completely.
We did not change anything in the list-setup. The mail-accounts are 
reachable. The outgoing server is working as allways. A mail that is 
send to the lists pops up in 'mailq' for a moment and dissappears again 
(-> is delivered to MM).

Where else could I look?

The following lines are logged in .../logs/error for each mail:
---8<-----------------------------------------
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942): Traceback (most recent call last):
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942):   File "/home/mailman/bin/qrunner", 
line 270, in ?
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942):      main()
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942):   File "/home/mailman/bin/qrunner", 
line 230, in main
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942):      qrunner.run()
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942):   File 
"/home/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 65, in run
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942):      filecnt = self._oneloop()
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942):   File 
"/home/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 93, in _oneloop
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942):      msg, msgdata = 
self._switchboard.dequeue(filebase)
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942):   File 
"/home/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Switchboard.py", line 156, in dequeue
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942):      data = self._ext_read(dbfile)
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942):   File 
"/home/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Switchboard.py", line 276, in _ext_read
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942):      dict[attr] = eval(sval, 
{'__builtins__': {}})
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942):   File "<string>", line 0, in ?
Mar 11 08:31:37 2005 qrunner(942): NameError :  name 'nan' is not defined
---8<-----------------------------------------

Has anybody an idea what we might try?

Thank you very much,

Stefan


-- 
"Whenever we desire, [we] as a standalone company, could raise
the price of the  patent-protected portion of our software and
immediately have enormous cash-flow."
     http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050223205453141