[Mailman-Users] Reply-To revisited

[Mark Sapiro]

Jost Krieger wrote:
>
>My idea would be to restructure the options in the following way:
>
>DEFAULT_REPLY_GOES_TO_LIST:
># 0 - Reply-To: no address
># 1 - Reply-To: back to the list
># 2 - Reply-To: to an explicit value (reply_to_address)
># 3 - Reply-To: to sender of mail
>
>DEFAULT_FIRST_STRIP_REPLY_TO
># 0 - merge
># 1 - override
># 2 - respect
>
>For our case, I'd use values of "0" and "2".

Would you really? How would that be different from the current
reply_goes_to_list = Poster and first_strip_reply_to = No

I think I can understand your idea if you would use values of 1 and 2,
but it wouldn't work because of all the MUAs that unconditionally put
Reply-To: in the message when it's not different from From:

--
Mark Sapiro <msapiro at value.net>       The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan