[Mailman-Users] qrunner: Low level smtp error

[Doug Hughes]

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Brad Knowles wrote:

> At 3:25 PM -0500 2004-06-25, Doug Hughes wrote:
>
> >  adding MX did not help. still same error when qrunner runs.
> >
> >  And, I should have noticed this before. I have another server running
> >  potato (mostly) with 2.0.13 and no issues (even though the source domain
> >  has no MX).
>
> 	Have you looked at the logs to see what is there?  Have you
> turned up the log level to show more data?
>

yeah, logs are pretty much as they were before
smtp-failure log:
Jun 26 22:34:20 2004 (25633) Low level smtp error: (-2, 'Name or service not known'), msgid: <mailman.0.1088251205.27238.kerry-tech at potomacalliance.us>
Jun 26 22:34:20 2004 (25633) delivery to kerry-tech-owner at potomacalliance.us failed with code -1: (-2, 'Name or service not known')
Jun 26 22:34:20 2004 (25633) Low level smtp error: (-2, 'Name or service not known'), msgid: <mailman.0.1088251207.27235.kerry-tech at potomacalliance.us>
Jun 26 22:34:20 2004 (25633) delivery to kerry-tech-owner at potomacalliance.us failed with code -1: (-2, 'Name or service not known')
Jun 26 22:34:20 2004 (25633) Low level smtp error: (-2, 'Name or service not known'), msgid: <mailman.0.1088303031.28874.kerry-tech at potomacalliance.us>
Jun 26 22:34:20 2004 (25633) delivery to doug at eng.auburn.edu failed with code -1: (-2, 'Name or service not known')
Jun 26 22:34:20 2004 (25633) Low level smtp error: (-2, 'Name or service not known'), msgid: <mailman.0.1088303054.28878.kerry-tech at potomacalliance.us>
Jun 26 22:34:20 2004 (25633) delivery to doug at eng.auburn.edu failed with code -1: (-2, 'Name or service not known')

I've tried running qrunner, but it doesn't show anything further.

Oddly, I did receive some messages today, but the errors come, and it took
days for them to get through. I sent another test through and got the same
sorts of log messages. I know it's not the MX this time.

puzzling.
I don't the possibility that I've forgotten something mindboggling simple,
but I've been running various mailman setups in similar format for past
5+ years and this is the first time I've encountered this.

	Doug