[Mailman-Users] Managing attachments in the list archive
Paul Kleeberg
paul at fpen.org
Sat Mar 15 21:16:07 CET 2003
I considered using MHArc which uses MHonArc and makes it searchable
but I decided against it for some odd reason which might have been
unique to my site and which I do not currently recall.
Again:
1. Is there a way to control what filetypes are stored and what are skipped?
2. Is there a way to fix the way the .pdf files from the PC are stored?
At 2:49 PM -0500 3/15/03, Jon Carnes wrote:
>Pipermail is the archiver that comes built-in to Mailman. While
>Pipermail fits the needs of 90% of the folks who use Mailman, it is a
>light-weight archiver. For more heavy duty archive use, you should look
>at using something like Mhonarc. Mhonarc should be able to handle your
>needs easily, and there is an FAQ on setting up Mhonarc with Mailman.
>
>Good Luck - Jon Carnes
>
>On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 10:02, Paul Kleeberg wrote:
>> I am transferring a list to Mailman 2.1.1 in which the members like
>> to send each other attachments. Attachments seem to be distributed
>> fine to the members but archive storage looks like it will be spotty.
>>
>> In testing from a PC with NT4.0 and Outlook2K, .jpg and .doc files
>> seem to store just fine. .pdf files go through to the subscribers
>> but are stored on the web with a "-0001.obj" replacing the ".pdf" at
>> the end of the file name. The file is then not recognized on the
>> client machine.
>>
>> When sent by a Macintosh with OSX using either Eudora or Mail.app,
>> attachments which are listed as "type multipart/appledouble" are
>> skipped and not stored in the web archives. The attachments are
>> distributed to the members intact but the archive states "Skipped
>> content of type multipart/appledouble"
>>
>> Two questions:
> > 1. How can I control what filetypes are stored and what are skipped?
> > 2. Is there a way to fix the way the .pdf files from the PC are stored?
>>
> > Paul
--
Paul Kleeberg
paul at fpen.org
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list