[Mailman-Users] RE: digest sent to list posting address, why?

[hostmaster at rattletrap.shults.org]

DOH!  

I just compared those headers to another email.  "Delivered-to:"

uh, seems I subscribed that address to test the digest and promptly forgot 
I'd done so.

I'll just go stand in the corner now.

Thanks for listing, hope it provided some amusement at least.
*sheepish grin*

~steven

On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 hostmaster at rattletrap.shults.org wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> thanks for the idea chuq, but I'm fairly certain the the 'on belhalf of'
> is a result of mailman's "Show member addrs so they're not directly
> recognizable as email addrs?" feature under 'privacy options' which I do
> have set to 'yes' for the list in question.
> 
> Full headers on the message in question follow here:
> 
> Return-Path: <discussion-admin at lists.shakespeare-monologues.org>
> Delivered-To: steven at speakeasy.net
> Received: (qmail 26787 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2002 21:45:08 -0000
> Received: from unknown (HELO rattletrap.shults.org) ([216.231.50.34]) 
> (envelope-sender <discussion-admin at lists.shakespeare-monologues.org>)
>           by mail11.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
>           for <steven at speakeasy.net>; 4 Jun 2002 21:45:08 -0000
> Received: from rattletrap.shults.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
> 	by rattletrap.shults.org (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id 
> g54Lk3001611
> 	for <steven at speakeasy.net>; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 14:46:03 -0700
> Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 14:45:04 -0700
> Message-ID: <20020604214504.1589.73229.Mailman at rattletrap.shults.org>
> From: discussion-request at lists.shakespeare-monologues.org
> Subject: discussion digest, Vol 1 #1 - 20 msgs
> X-Mailer: Mailman v2.0.11
> MIME-version: 1.0
> Content-type: multipart/mixed; 
> boundary=216.231.50.34.503.1589.1023227104.823.6791
> To: discussion at lists.shakespeare-monologues.org
> Sender: discussion-admin at lists.shakespeare-monologues.org
> Errors-To: discussion-admin at lists.shakespeare-monologues.org
> X-BeenThere: discussion at lists.shakespeare-monologues.org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
> Precedence: bulk
> Reply-To: discussion at lists.shakespeare-monologues.org
> X-Reply-To: discussion at lists.shakespeare-monologues.org
> List-Help: 
> <mailto:discussion-request at lists.shakespeare-monologues.org?subject=help>
> List-Post: <mailto:discussion at lists.shakespeare-monologues.org>
> List-Subscribe: 
> <http://lists.shakespeare-monologues.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion>,
> 	
> <mailto:discussion-request at lists.shakespeare-monologues.org?subject=subscribe>
> List-Id: A discussion list with an online archive <br>for users of 
> shakespeare-monologues.org <discussion.lists.shakespeare-monologues.org>
> List-Unsubscribe: 
> <http://lists.shakespeare-monologues.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion>,
> 	
> <mailto:discussion-request at lists.shakespeare-monologues.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> 
> > On 6/5/02 4:43 PM, "hostmaster at rattletrap.shults.org"
> > <hostmaster at rattletrap.shults.org> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > >> One of my new lists sent the first digest to the list posting
> > >> address today 
> > >> from listname-admin at hostname.tld 'on behalf of'
> > >> listname-request at hostname.tld
> > >> to listname at hostname.tld
> > 
> > 
> > Did you check the Received: lines to make sure this thing didn't make a
> > round trip through some user's mail client? Because that "on behalf of"
> > sounds an awful lot like it got forwarded or redirected. Take a look at a
> > set of full headers to see whether maybe it got sent out normally, and then
> > someone who received it did this to you.... Um, for you. Um...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Mailman-Users mailing list
> Mailman-Users at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
> Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
>