[Mailman-Users] [ANNOUNCE] Mailman 2.0 beta 1

[Ralf Hildebrandt]

Am 24.03.2000 um 14:55:48 +0100 schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt folgendes:

> Why on earth can't you just encode the version in the name like everybody
> does -- I mean, the subdir is called mailman-2.0beta1, why not call the
> binary mailman-2.0beta1.tar.gz then?

Ok, by now somebody told me that it's just a link to the most recent version
to make automatic downloading easier ...

> What happened to 1.2 ? I've got 1.1 installed, updated via CVS to
> mailman-1.2b1 and now we have 2.0 ? =:)

And that has also been solved...
BTW -- I really like 2.0 -- it works as expected, I had no transition
troubles. Great product!

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt <R.Hildebrandt at tu-bs.de> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that,
lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of
their C Programs.