[Mailman-Users] Feature questions
Ted Cabeen
secabeen at pobox.com
Wed Mar 22 21:42:03 CET 2000
In message <Pine.LNX.4.04.10003221153241.9345-100000 at archer.kd-dev.com>, Derek
Simkowiak writes:
>> > What he would like is an MLM that can do a union of subscribers
>> >based on the "To: " field of the email message.
>> Duplicate elimination is really a problem that should be solved at the user
>> end, not at the server end.
> Why? One could just as easily state that maintaining recipient
>lists is a problem that should be solved at the user end, not the server
>end.
Because you have no idea what people are doing with the mail. Someone could
have subscribed an exploder list to yours and someone could get two copies
that way. Once a mail has left your list server, anything could happen to
it. If a user then didn't want to get a mail twice, they would prevent it
from happening. It's also possible that someone is using the number of times
they get a mail as a measure of it's importance. By eliminating this option,
you remove another feature that someone might be using.
I'm not trying to say that doing duplicate address checking is a bad thing, I
just feel that it's not something that should be included in mailman itself.
If you need it, feel free to modify mailman to do it. I just would prefer
that we not continue to clutter the Mailman admin interface with this
particular option.
--
Ted Cabeen http://www.pobox.com/~secabeen secabeen at pobox.com
Check Website or finger for PGP Public Key secabeen at midway.uchicago.edu
"I have taken all knowledge to be my province." -F. Bacon cococabeen at aol.com
"Human kind cannot bear very much reality."-T.S.Eliot 73126.626 at compuserve.com
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list