[Mailman-Users] fully qualified domain name
Paolo
pumilia at est.it
Thu Oct 21 15:48:50 CEST 1999
Received from Christopher Lindsey, On Thu Oct 21 at 1:59:
.> .Mail sent to user1 from another user on the same host are promptly received
.> .whether using the address user1 or user1 at dom.org or user1 at hname.dom.org
.> .
.> What i would like to figure out is how did the host name 'hname' enter the address.
.> I have always used 'user1 at dom.org' in configuration files (alias, ect.);
.
.I don't think that this is a problem with Mailman. The best way
.to test this is by sending mail to the fully-qualified address
.and seeing if it changes in the To: header. If it stays the way
.that you typed it, then you're just dealing with a simple case of
.RFC 822 compliance.
The address stays as the sender typed it. What does RFC 822 compliance imply?
.If you're using a different MTA, tough noogies. I haven't played
.with them enough to know how to deal with this. :)
Smail is the MTA on the site Mailman should be running.
Sysdamin told me that relaying restrictions have been very strictly set after
a dangerous attack by unknown intruders.
Anybody found himself in a simillar situation?
thanks
Paolo Pumilia
email: pumilia at est.it
---- cstc -
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list