From clytie at riverland.net.au  Thu Aug  2 09:42:06 2007
From: clytie at riverland.net.au (Clytie Siddall)
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:12:06 +0930
Subject: [Mailman-i18n] Updating translations
In-Reply-To: <48582D54-ED1E-4E93-B996-E75FC92BEF00@python.org>
References: <9707FB36-8A9A-43B5-8739-E6EA84432E71@riverland.net.au>
	<48582D54-ED1E-4E93-B996-E75FC92BEF00@python.org>
Message-ID: <482682FE-AEEE-40EB-91F9-6A8A972A3B7F@riverland.net.au>


On 31/07/2007, at 2:48 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Jul 28, 2007, at 2:49 AM, Clytie Siddall wrote:
>
>> Even the POT file in the Mailman 3.0 branch has a last-modified  
>> date of 2006-04-28. The vi.po files in each branch are complete,  
>> and haven't been changed since I last submitted them.
>
> Hi Clytie,
>
> At this point, no one should waste time trying to translate the 3.0  
> branch.  A lot has changed and a lot /will/ change yet.  For  
> example, I'm currently working on changing the entire address  
> registration and confirmation stuff.  Strings and templates that  
> used to talk about confirming a list subscription now talk about  
> confirming an email address registration.
>
> The 2.1 pot file should definitely be up-to-date.  If not, we need  
> to regenerate it.  The 2.2 pot file should be pretty much up-to- 
> date, although it may change as we start to see the fruits of the  
> new web u/i.  I still think it's a little early to start  
> translating 2.2, but we should make sure the 2.1 branch has updated  
> pot files, and we should concentrate on getting the translations up- 
> to-date for 2.1.10.

OK, as long as my translations are up-to-date, that's my main  
concern. :)

from Clytie (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / nh?m  
Vi?t h?a ph?n m?m t? do)
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/vi-VN


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-i18n/attachments/20070802/5de8c32a/attachment.pgp 

From clytie at riverland.net.au  Mon Aug  6 10:32:10 2007
From: clytie at riverland.net.au (Clytie Siddall)
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:02:10 +0930
Subject: [Mailman-i18n] Pootle syncs with bzr
In-Reply-To: <1185871463.6706.30.camel@localhost>
References: <1184340327.25598.1.camel@localhost>
	<A6CC1E56-D32B-4AF1-BC13-63F64E32B055@riverland.net.au>
	<20070730173249.GE7649@genesis.frugalware.org>
	<20070730225159.GI7649@genesis.frugalware.org>
	<1185871463.6706.30.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <0CEDDF77-353C-4F25-B095-C384597F5702@riverland.net.au>

To: mailman-i18n
Cc: translate-pootle

I never cease to be amazed at the responsiveness of the Wordforge  
project (Pootle, Translate Toolkit etc.).

I asked about adding support for bzr to the current SVN sync  
capacity, on 2007-07-30.

On 31/07/2007, at 6:14 PM, F Wolff wrote:

> Op Dinsdag 31-07-2007 om 00:51 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef VMiklos:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Na Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 07:32:49PM +0200, VMiklos  
>> <vmiklos at frugalware.org> pisal(a):
>>> i'll try to prepare a patch tonight, shouldn't be too hard to do so
>>
>> http://frugalware.org/~vmiklos/patches/pootle-bzr.diff
>>
>
> Great! Thank you! I committed in SVN with revision 6202.

and it was there the next day!

Thankyou, Miklos and Friedel. :)

Mailman developers, Pootle now offers bzr syncing.

from Clytie (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / nh?m  
Vi?t h?a ph?n m?m t? do)
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/vi-VN


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-i18n/attachments/20070806/23117762/attachment.pgp