[Mailman-Developers] Basic workflow of the ARC implementation
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sun Mar 13 23:12:47 EDT 2016
Aditya Divekar writes:
> Yes, in that case the arc verification would need to be postponed to after
> the entire code for the header generation has been written. I'll need to
> rethink the milestones a bit, since this testing part would have to be
> added at the end, and things will change quite a bit.
That's what I wanted to hear! We're making rapid progress!
Let me know your thoughts on milestones. There's no huge hurry, since
applications haven't even opened yet.
> On a side note, would posting on the arc-discuss list for help in
> the above problem of testing be acceptable?
Yes, but not yet. I should probably review your first post or two
before posting, as well. There are plenty of friendly, helpful people
on the IETF lists[1], but the lists themselves are rather different in
tone and style from most open-source projects.
Footnotes:
[1] Technically arc-discuss is hosted by dmarc.org, not the IETF, but
it's the same people.
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list