[Mailman-Developers] Fixing DMARC problems with .invalid munge

[SM]

Hi Stephen,
At 23:28 05-05-2014, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Don't you have that backwards?  It's pointing out lack of a formal
>hard requirement that is nit-picking.  After all, Postel's Principle
>isn't written in any IETF procedure manual.  Would you call that one a
>"nit", too?

I labelled my previous comment as a nit (the previous comment was 
unimportant).  I would not describe anything someone else writes as a nit.

Regards,
-sm