[Mailman-Developers] ANNOUNCE: The GNU Mailman 3 suite, beta 1 preview

Mark Sapiro mark at msapiro.net
Sat May 3 17:22:05 CEST 2014


On 05/03/2014 07:15 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at list.org> wrote:
> ...
>> On behalf of the Mailman development team, I am happy
>> to announce the first beta release of the full Mailman 3 suite.
>>
>> This release includes:
> ...
>> Core
>>     project  - https://launchpad.net/mailman
> ...
> 
> I apologize for my confusion, but I'm not used to the bazaar model for
> multiple developers.  I'm used to the svn model for C/C++ code where
> we keep the trunk as the latest development version (but we keep the
> trunk so it always builds without error).
> 
> If I want the latest development version of Mailman should I use the
> announced lp address above or the one I'm using now:
> 
> Related branches:
>   parent branch: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mailman-coders/mailman/3.0/
> revision-id: barry at list.org-20140101145942-b9vqi0xmcewpk4mb
> date: 2014-01-01 09:59:42 -0500
> build-date: 2014-05-03 10:07:35 -0400
> revno: 7232


Now I'm confused, but it looks like you are looking at a local (to you)
branch that you branched at rev 7232 from lp:mailman or
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mailman-coders/mailman/3.0/ or some other
alias for that branch.

If you now cd to that branch on your local machine and do 'bzr pull' it
should bring you up to the head of the branch on launchpad at rev 7251.

OTOH, if that is not your local branch, but a branch you obtained
elsewhere, then you probably should not be using it as the 'official'
branch is lp:mailman.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan


More information about the Mailman-Developers mailing list