[Mailman-Developers] A list of discussion topics: GSoC OpenPGP Integration

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Barry Warsaw writes:

 > It's a valid complaint.  What I've suggested in the past is that a
 > rule can do some *nondestructive* processing of a message before it
 > makes its decision.  The rule would either throw out the results of
 > the processing (possibly leading to duplication of work) or would
 > cache the results, e.g. in the metadata dictionary (possibly
 > leading to a rather large pickle/in-memory data).

Yeah, I was afraid you'd say something like that.  This could be quite
expensive in terms of duplicating work for encryption, but I guess we
cross that bridge when we come to it.