[Mailman-Developers] MM3: less generic names for scripts in $PATH?

[Paul Wise]

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at list.org> wrote:

> `master` and `runner` are a bit more problematic because they are pretty handy
> as separate commands.  I don't think they belong under `bin/mailman` and since
> they're of internal use only, I would never expect them to be installed into
> /usr/bin.  More likely any vendor package would put them under
> /usr/lib/mailman/bin in an FHS world.
>
> I'm not sure MM3 can function with `master` and `runner` under
> /usr/lib/mailman/bin but I would accept patches that made that work.  (Or at
> least file a bug with a mailman3 tag).

I'll take a look at that this week too since currently they are
installed in $prefix/bin.

-- 
bye,
pabs