[Mailman-Developers] Improving the archives

Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Fri Jul 20 14:43:11 CEST 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Jul 8, 2007, at 1:06 AM, Paul Wise wrote:

> My personal opinion is that pipermail should be removed and mailman
> should not contain a default archiver since there are plenty of good
> archivers already (lurker, mhonarc etc). Adding wrappers around them
> would be simpler than reimplementing them.

My hesitation to this has always been the turnkey question.   
Pipermail has it's problems but it /does/ allow small sites to get  
going very quickly with a full(-ish) solution.

It may be that most people get their Mailman installation from their  
distro or hosting service and this is no longer as important.  In  
that case, I still wouldn't chuck Pipermail, but I would try to see  
if we can adopt Jeff's goal of making the archive selection pluggable  
and easily selectable by list admins.

- -Barry

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBRqCt4HEjvBPtnXfVAQJHQwP+P4KAQaA7uEeISQjFyb3zoMvOWwgoW3zH
taWsnVAhVmAF/hJBWDn7JtXwWiLw7ngCtGHp3MBKGBKzBjJP7ZizEMNfziaB+OoO
LOyF7sYB+KhKVi+Il7XnHYIjh6DSD8kullP+G/UNtuIsFnNs+aTntndfMKJG2Zct
E7M0F1Ok8FE=
=xXQJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Mailman-Developers mailing list