[Mailman-Developers] dkim-signature headers

[John W. Baxter]

On 2/8/07 10:27 AM, "Barry Warsaw" <barry at python.org> wrote:

> Me too.  Here's my discussion on the topic, including a concrete
> proposal for Mailman 2.1.10 and 2.2/3.0.  Feel free to comment on the
> wiki on in this thread.
> 
> http://wiki.list.org/x/OgM
> 

Looks good to me.

" IOW, a valid signed List-ID header should be indication enough that all
other signatures were subject to breakage because of mailing list garbling"

Probably should be "...all prior signatures..." not "...other...".

  ---
Since the public key for a DKIM signature comes from DNS (as I understand
it), an administrative detail is that a mailing list operator has to provide
for the key's existence in order for Mailman's attempt to sign to be
effective.

  --John