[Mailman-Developers] dkim-signature headers
Stephen J. Turnbull
turnbull at sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
Wed Feb 7 17:40:49 CET 2007
Barry Warsaw writes:
> Part of me agrees that this is what you'd like to see, but my gut
> tells me that this will never work in practice. First, no one but an
> email geek will even understand the question, let alone know how to
> answer it,
Agreed. It's a stalking horse for the BCP; for anybody who's not an
email geek, I have this simple advice regarding the BCP:
Run away! Run away!
> and second, I fear that most u/i's and policy engines will
> boil this down to a very simple choice for the user:
>
> This message is unverified
>
> [Accept] [Discard]
> (o) Do the same for all similar messages
Make sure no spam gets through your double opt-in list, and you're
golden, no?
Similar is *not* going to reduce to "is unverified"; too many
grandmothers will lose messages from the grandkids.
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list