[Mailman-Developers] 2.1.8 documentation mismatch

[Barry Warsaw]

On Jun 8, 2006, at 7:39 AM, David Lee wrote:
>
> Given that I'm just about to start on implementing this, it would  
> be nice
> to establish whether this sender-related word "Authorised" is the
> appropriate word, or if there is something better.
>
> Locally, we need to get moving on implementing this concept.   
> Whilst my
> local code might get heavily replaced as future versions of Mailman
> (re-)implement these ideas, it would nevertheless be useful, from the
> persepctive of our users, to get the terminology agreed early on.)
>

Seems reasonable (I should go back and re-read that thread, but I  
think I get the gist of it), except for the English-speaking world's  
inability to agree on the spelling of that word. :)  In the US, it's  
"Authorized".

I suppose you could accept both keywords.

-Barry