[Mailman-Developers] email schemas

[Ian Eiloart]

--On 6 July 2006 11:30:08 -0400 John Dennis <jdennis at redhat.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure I understand what the purpose is in treating the extended
> fields differently, it seems like it would overly complicate the xml
> navigation without any clear advantage. Anyone who is interested in the
> value of an extended field will know it by name and ask for it by name
> just like the defined fields.

I think the problem is that you can't define them in the schema. With 
ethan's mechanism, you just have to define one tag - x-header.

-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex