[Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Users] respond_to_post_requests and header_filter_rules

[Tokio Kikuchi]

Hi again,

Ivan Fetch wrote:

> Hello,
> 
>    Thank you for your reply -- I'm using Mailman 2.1.5 (sorry for not 
> mentioning this previously).  We'd rather be able to configure the 
> filters to hold (not discard) spam, at least for those lists where the 
> list administrators prefer to double check what is being tagged as spam.
> 

You can create two or more new header_filter_rules. I suggest you create 
one for hold and another for discard. You can add a test regex into the 
first box and when you learn that it works right then move it to the 
second one to discard the spam silently.

>    Is the help text of respond_to_post_requests inaccurate in how it 
> claims that notifying posters of held messages excludes spam filtering?

Historically, it was right statement once upon a time in 2.0.x era.


-- 
Tokio Kikuchi, tkikuchi@ is.kochi-u.ac.jp
http://weather.is.kochi-u.ac.jp/