[Mailman-Developers] Dates again

Kenneth Porter shiva at sewingwitch.com
Sat Nov 20 22:26:12 CET 2004


--On Saturday, November 20, 2004 6:22 AM -0500 Steven Kuck <scrib at afn.org> 
wrote:

> As I said, I can guarantee messages from the future are wrong.  Disagree?
>
> Perhaps messages from more than a day (or N days) in the past could be
> bounced saying:
> "Either your system clock is wrong or your message was unreasonably
> delayed.  Either fix your clock, or make sure your message is still
> current and send it again."
> Alternately, the message could be held for approval or date fixing, and
> you could set that user as "Date Impaired" so that all messages from that
> individual get fixed - if they're off.

This seems a reasonable approach, given a configurable delivery delay 
tolerance. One could also cross-check References headers against messages 
already received, to set a lower limit on the time stamp. If a message 
claims to have been sent prior to one it references (modulo some 
tolerance), then it can be bounced/modified/moderated.


More information about the Mailman-Developers mailing list