[Mailman-Developers] Requirements for a new archiver

Brad Knowles brad.knowles at skynet.be
Thu Oct 30 00:56:13 EST 2003


At 12:49 AM -0500 2003/10/30, J C Lawrence wrote:

>  ReiserFS also does particularly well here.  I haven't yet tested IBM's
>  JFS.  Last time I hit VxFS hard (back in the HP-UX 20.20 days) it really
>  didn't like huge directories, but that may have changed since then.

	HP-UX 20.20?  I wasn't aware that they had gone much beyond HP-UX 
11.x.  Did you mean HP-UX 10.20?  Now that's a beast I remember, and 
remember loathing with a passion.

	HP-UX 9 was slow, but rock-solid -- no matter how hard you beat 
on the damn thing, it just slowed down but never stopped.  HP-UX 10.x 
was a real dog.  HP-UX 11.x looked like it was going to shape up 
better, but then I got out of AOL before we had many of those systems 
in house.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)



More information about the Mailman-Developers mailing list