[Mailman-Developers] Hmm... More on header mangling...

[Ron Jarrell]

At 10:50 PM 5/17/02 -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:

> >>>>> "RJ" == Ron Jarrell <jarrell@vt.edu> writes:
>
>     RJ> Mailman did the "mangle the header line prematurely ending the
>     RJ> headers" trick to it.  But for once I can see what the header
>     RJ> looked like originally!
>
>Confirmed (and sorry about that hold warning you probably got Ron ;).

Which had me confused as hell for about 30 seconds, trying to figure out 
how one of my tests ended up routed through wooz.org! :-)

>Now I just need to figure out why!

Note that my "three line header" idea got shot to hell when I chopped the 
third line of and it still acquired the extra new line.  It's showing up 
that way in the pickle, so it's either email's parseheaders (I'm thinking 
there might be some subtle error with a "too long" line and how it's 
interacting with "NL.join") or with the pickling process.  Since the extra 
nl is in the pickle, everyone downstream in the pipeline just inhereits the 
problem.

(Why do I seem to always find the truly strange problems?)