[Mailman-Developers] RE: [Mailman-Announce] RELEASED Mailman 2.1 beta 2

[J C Lawrence]

On Mon, 06 May 2002 10:24:28 -0700 
Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com> wrote:

> I would, by the way, do two of these: a pre-filter and a
> post-filter. The pre-filter is primarily for cleaning up before it
> goes for delivery. If you allow it to return a set of known values,
> you can even use it for determining moderator hold, rejection, etc
> (and through that, plug into tools like spamassasin). The post-filter
> would be a nice, easy hook into things like mhonarc for customized
> archive systems and the like...

I would kill for a post-filter.  Why?  So I can inject every message
with the URL of where it sits in the web archives.

  _______________________________________________

  WhatEver Mailing list  whatever@some.domain
  http://some.domain/lists/listinfo/whatever
  Message archived at: http://some.domain/archives/whatever/2002Q2/mesg0009.php

-- 
J C Lawrence                
---------(*)                Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. 
claw@kanga.nu               He lived as a devil, eh?		  
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/  Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.