[Mailman-Developers] Re: Opening up a few can o' worms here...

[Dan Mick]

Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> On 7/30/02 10:10 AM, "Dan Mick" <Dan.Mick@sun.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>That sounds like a "yes the premise is invalid", not a "no".
> 
> 
> Thank you for explaining to me what I said, because otherwise, I wouldn't
> have known what it was I was saying.

Oh, for Christ's sake, Chuq, isn't someone allowed to ask you to
clarify, because they're just Far Stupider than You?

Damn.  I was trying to add clarification rather than snottiness,
and you just refuse.