[Mailman-Developers] Re: Cute TMDA use

[Barry A. Warsaw]

>>>>> "JRM" == Jason R Mastaler <jason@mastaler.com> writes:

    >> Yes, and because we currently have no database that's shared
    >> across mailing lists.  Issues I don't want to think about
    >> include concurrent access to a shared database.

    JRM> This assumes all the functionality is built into MM, rather
    JRM> than hooking TMDA into MM.  In the latter case, it wouldn't
    JRM> matter whether MM had the shared db, as the lookup would come
    JRM> from an external source.

So if we /don't/ build the functionality into MM2.1 (as Chuq is so
sensibly arguing :) is there anything we need to do to implement the
whitelisting TMDA fronted MM that is being proposed here?

If so, let's talk about that.  If not, maybe we're done. :)

-Barry