[Mailman-Developers] MM 2.0.9 not announced?

[Jason R. Mastaler]

Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com> writes:

> Just MHO, but I wouldn't roll a release just for the message-id
> patch. I'd put it in the 2.1 tree, and if something else makes a
> 2.0.10 worthwhile, roll it then.

Do you mean the 2.0 tree?  2.1 already adds a Message-ID (with
different code).

It's up to Barry I guess, but I was thinking that a 2.0.10 would be
easy because 2.0.9 was never formally announced.  Release numbers are
cheap.

-- 
(http://tmda.sourceforge.net/)