[Mailman-Developers] 2.0.x qrunner bug (bad one)

[Chuq Von Rospach]

On 4/3/02 6:39 PM, "Barry A. Warsaw" <barry@zope.com> wrote:


> I thought about the same thing, and /almost/ added it, but then I
> checked RFC 2822.  While it requires one Date: header, Message-ID: is
> actually /not/ required, although it "SHOULD be present".  I took that
> as license to be as conservative as possible. :)

I'm curious, and in honesty, haven't looked. Is qmail RFC compliant here? Or
is it a case of doing what the authors feel is right, not what the standards
tell them to? 


-- 
Chuq Von Rospach, Architech
chuqui@plaidworks.com -- http://www.chuqui.com/

No! No! Dead girl, OFF the table! -- Shrek