[Mailman-Developers] Reply-To: handling

[bob@nleaudio.com]

This is a MIME-encapsulated message.

--------------484186484748740099568004
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Chuq,

I totally agree.  I had to "solve" a problem on one of my lists that ended up being a
fairly prolific poster had his "Reply-to" set to his own address.  The list was set so
that replies went to the list, but any reply to his messages on the list did not, due to
his "reply-to" being set.

IMHO, if you want replies to go to the list, they should ALWAYS go to the list.  If they
go to the user, then Reply-to could be acceptable to pass on, I suppose.

Bob

>It seems from a consistency's sake, the MLM ought to handle this stuff
>unambiguously, which means ONLY mailman's reply-to (or lack of it) ought be
>be propogated. 
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mailman-Developers mailing list
>Mailman-Developers@python.org
>http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
>


--------------484186484748740099568004--