[Mailman-Developers] Re: way to minimize IO load with MTAsupported VERP

Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:46:55 -0500


On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 04:00:11AM -0800, Dan Mick wrote:
> A thing I hadn't thought about: if the local MTA senses that the remote
> MTA *also* supports XVERP, it doesn't have to do the expansion
> itself; it can simply send on one XVERP-ed multirecipient message,
> and let the final MTA handle the envelope multiplication.


Which would be the True Win... but *absolutely requires* an RFC for
verp syntax, which will have to be extensible.  No, really.  It will.
Take my word for it.  :-)

*I* think that sending a VERP template, with a spot marked for the
destination MTA to put the destination email address, would be the most
flexible approach.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra@baylink.com
Member of the Technical Staff     Baylink                             RFC 2100
The Suncoast Freenet         The Things I Think
Tampa Bay, Florida        http://baylink.pitas.com             +1 727 647 1274

   "If you don't have a dream; how're you gonna have a dream come true?"
     -- Captain Sensible, The Damned (from South Pacific's "Happy Talk")