[Mailman-Developers] Patching qrunner to never send duplicates w/ same Message-ID
Marc MERLIN
marc_news@valinux.com
Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:48:12 -0700
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 02:35:28PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>
> >>>>> "JRA" == Jay R Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> writes:
>
> JRA> You *tell* mutt which To: addresses are lists, and then you
> JRA> can use the 'L' key to reply to the list, or the traditional
> JRA> 'r' key to reply only to the sender.
>
> Yes, but what happens when a non-member posts to a list? They won't
> see your response.
Correct, but
1) That's too bad :-)
2) Many lists don't let non subscribers post anymore. That's actually slowly
becoming the norm
3) If you can post to a list you're not a member of, you are expected to add
a line at the top asking to be Cced because you don't receive the list.
While we are on this topic, I would really love for a way for mailman to
optionally parse the Cc and To lines and not send a post to a subscribed
address if that address was already in the headers.
The idea is that I'm stuck with a list that has the evil reply-to munging,
and the subscribers refuse to have the reply-to munging removed because they
can't bear the fact of receiving two copies of posts when they are Cced in
an answer (no, they can't use procmail to weed duplicate msg-ids)
As evil as it is, reply-to munging does kind of aleviate that problem (i.e.
reply to all usually only goes to To: Cc: and Reply-To:, not to From:)
I'm not sure how hard it would be for mailman to do that.
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@merlins.org for PGP key