[Mailman-Developers] Reverting question

[Simon Coggins]

I have to agree here. Not being able to override the reply-to: fields on
lists is a *MAJOr* problem. I've also had this problem with my lists. And I
was hoping for a 'fix' but it looks like it's intended behaviour?.

I think if thats going to be the case there should be another option. 'Force
list replyto' .

Regards
Simon


On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 12:43:23AM -0500, Phil Barnett wrote:
> On 14 Nov 2000, at 0:32, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> 
> > 
> > >>>>> "PB" == Phil Barnett <midnight@the-oasis.net> writes:
> > 
> >     PB> Am I likely to encounter problems going from 2.0rc2 to 2.0b6?
> > 
> > Do you mean downgrading?  Don't do that!  If you really mean from
> > 2.0b6 to 2.0rc2 then you should be fine.  Any data formats that need
> > updating will get updated automatically.
> 
> I specifically mean downgrading. I have a hornets nest on my 
> hands and I'm about to lose my lists back to egroups.
> 
> This lack of reply to the list 'updated feature' has them HEATED.
> 
> Perhaps I'm not clear. If I lose them to egroups, there is no point to 
> me running Mailman anymore.
> 
> This 'upgraded feature' is suicidal for Mailman on my machine.
> 
> 
> -- 
>               Phil Barnett  mailto:midnight@the-oasis.net
>                        WWW  http://www.the-oasis.net/
>                   FTP Site  ftp://ftp.the-oasis.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailman-Developers mailing list
> Mailman-Developers@python.org
> http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
-- 
Simon Coggins (SAGE-AU Member)                     Email: simon@uow.edu.au
Network and System Management Officer              Phone: +61-2-4221-3775
Information Technology Systems (ITS)               Mobile: 0408 115861
University of Wollongong, 2522, Australia          Fax:   +61-2-4229-1985