[Mailman-Developers] The bulk issue

[John Viega]

I think you're *supposed* to use "Precedence: list" for a mailing
list.  Might want to check the RFC.

On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 05:42:16PM -0500, Ken Manheimer wrote:
> Can anyone say why we are not putting "Precedence: bulk" on maillist
> traffic passed by mailman?  I seem to recall raising the issue, and
> having objections, but i'm not recalling the objections, and my yearning
> to have vacation programs behave like we want (ignoring the messages) is
> still increasing.  So i propose again that we inject our own precedence
> header iff one is not already there...
> 
> Ken
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 14:34:08 -0800 (PST)
> From: via the vacation program <murdock@psych.ucsb.edu>
> Subject: away from my mail
> 
> I will be out of the office until Monday December 14.
> Your email regarding
> 
>         "Re: [Mailman-Users] Compilation problems"
> 
> will be read when I return.
> 
>                  Larry Murdock
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailman-Developers maillist  -  Mailman-Developers@python.org
> http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers