From barry at python.org Sun Feb 1 11:30:42 2004 From: barry at python.org (Barry Warsaw) Date: Sun Feb 1 11:30:47 2004 Subject: [Mailman-21] How to send problems In-Reply-To: <20040119064218.39257.qmail@web12208.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040119064218.39257.qmail@web12208.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1075653041.21821.161.camel@anthem> On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 01:42, Lakmi munasinghe wrote: > I got the subscription of your mailing list. I need to know the > procedure of how to write to a mailing list. Should I write to a > particular address ? > How can I see the answers I get for my problem. > Please help. > Lakmi I'm not really sure what you're talking about. Which mailing list did you join? -Barry From peter at engcorp.com Sat Feb 28 22:51:10 2004 From: peter at engcorp.com (Peter Hansen) Date: Sat Feb 28 22:52:07 2004 Subject: package similar to XML::Simple References: <402931E4.C1E50E92@engcorp.com> <40294322.7AF2C6D7@engcorp.com> <40294D36.B0AEE3C4@engcorp.com> <402A69C2.FC8DABA@engcorp.com> Message-ID: <402BA7B2.30D2B4D7@engcorp.com> Stuart Bishop wrote: > > Classifying a lack of Unicode support in an XML parser as a > 'bug' is ridiculous. True, if it's not a bug. If it were just a bug, then it wouldn't be at all ridiculous. As it isn't a bug, but a packaging choice (as it now seems) then you're quite right that it's not a bug! :-) > When I looked into it further, it became clear that pyRXP was > not what I would call an XML parser *by design* and that > ReportLab's definition of XML was slightly more flexible than > mine :-) Do you mean it doesn't handle addition things that are part of the core XML standard? Or are we still talking about *just* the lack of Unicode? I thought what I read on their web site made it clear that it *does* support Unicode, but it was simply not enabled in the current compilation. If that's true, then clearly it *is* an XML parser *by design*. I must still be missing something here. Sorry for being obtuse. -Peter