[IronPython] -X:PreferComDispatch

[Curt Hagenlocher]

>
> 2007/10/3, Martin <storm.openmail at gmail.com>:
> > Reason I'm asking if IronPython doesn't require interop assemblies to
> > access COM objects then the issue of supporting pythong standard
> > libraries become atleast less of an issue?


There's "feature compatibility" (both products support COM) and "source
compatibility" (my COM-using app runs unchanged under either CPython or
IronPython). Whether or not feature compatibility is sufficient is
presumably going to be up to the community and the way it votes for changes.

On 10/3/07, Sanghyeon Seo <sanxiyn at gmail.com> wrote:

> I can't see how two are related, given that Python standard library
> doesn't use COM.


There is COM support in the Pythonwin extensions.  Some people might
consider this to be part of the standard library under Windows, even though
it's not an official part of Python.

--
Curt Hagenlocher
curt at hagenlocher.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20071003/8a44fd69/attachment.html>