[Inpycon] PyCon proposal review process

[Milap Bhojak]

Perfect :)


On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:12 AM, me kracekumar <me at kracekumar.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
>  We received 143 proposals and 30 proposals on last day.
>
> Review process:
>
>  Review process will happen in two phases. During phase1 of review, each
> reviewer will give +1, 0, -1 for each proposal. After the phase 1, any talk
> with no negatives will be accepted and with >3 negatives is rejected.
> Remaining talks will move to phase 2. In Phase 2, reviews will happens in
> group. After phase 2 final list will be announced. Reviewer is free to
> communicate to the proposer through funnel.
>
>
> What does votes mean ?
>
> +1 -- The topic sounds good and the proposal is solid. This vote means
> reviewer is willing to put his/her reputation on the line in favour of the
> proposal.
>
> 0 -- This topic is good and the proposal is solid. The speaker is capable
> of correcting any deficiencies, and significant number of attendees want it.
>
> -1 -- This talk or its proposal has significant problems and would be
> worse for having it.
>
> Some criteria for evaluation are
>
> - Will I attend the talk if it is selected ?
> - Are there a significant group of attendees who want to attend the talk?
> - Do author know enough about the topic?
> - Is the proposal too ambitious for the time allotted?
>
> We will be publishing this as blog post soon.
>
> --
> Regards
> Kracekumar
> http://kracekumar.com
> +91 85530 29521
>
> _______________________________________________
> Inpycon mailing list
> Inpycon at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon
>
>


-- 
Thanks,
Milap Bhojak | Google Developers Group - Gandhinagar |
milapbhojak.exe at gmail.com |
 +91-9898855075
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/inpycon/attachments/20140602/787be44d/attachment.html>