From adityaatluri.py at gmail.com Sun Sep 1 17:20:25 2013 From: adityaatluri.py at gmail.com (Aditya Atluri) Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 20:50:25 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Feedback on Pycon Message-ID: I have one word. Awesome. The time management is the best thing you managed. Food is delicious. A hundred thumbs up for all organisers and volunteers. Thank you Aditya Avinash Atluri, Sent from HTC One S. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From abdulmuneer at gmail.com Sun Sep 1 17:38:38 2013 From: abdulmuneer at gmail.com (Abdul Muneer) Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 21:08:38 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] This Pycon was Awesome!!! Message-ID: Hi All, This was a fantastic edition of Pycon India!! Thank you all for pulling it off. It was a complete improvement in all aspects when compared to last year. The organizers have taken all the feedback from previous years and ensured improvement. Quality of the talks, the venue and the facilities - there is no area that was not improved over the previous years. We may not be absolutely perfect yet (especially regarding quality of a few talks), but we have come a long way. We even had novel initiatives like Python Month and Panel Discussion this year which stood out. I also think limiting the number of tracks helped in better coordination and arrangement. Having dedicated workshops also helped. All organizers and volunteers, take a bow. Heartfelt thanks to you all. Regards, Abdul Muneer -- Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scorpion032 at gmail.com Sun Sep 1 20:18:07 2013 From: scorpion032 at gmail.com (Lakshman Prasad) Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 23:48:07 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] This Pycon was Awesome!!! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 I feel very similar! Great job for pulling off an awesome event! On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Abdul Muneer wrote: > Hi All, > This was a fantastic edition of Pycon India!! Thank you all for pulling it > off. It was a complete improvement in all aspects when compared to last > year. The organizers have taken all the feedback from previous years and > ensured improvement. > > Quality of the talks, the venue and the facilities - there is no area that > was not improved over the previous years. We may not be absolutely perfect > yet (especially regarding quality of a few talks), but we have come a long > way. > > We even had novel initiatives like Python Month and Panel Discussion this > year which stood out. I also think limiting the number of tracks helped in > better coordination and arrangement. Having dedicated workshops also helped. > > All organizers and volunteers, take a bow. Heartfelt thanks to you all. > Regards, > Abdul Muneer > > -- > Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anilkumar.tammineni at gmail.com Mon Sep 2 04:59:23 2013 From: anilkumar.tammineni at gmail.com (Anil Kumar Chowdary) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 08:29:23 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] This Pycon was Awesome!!! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 2nd of the conference rocks :) 2013/9/1 Abdul Muneer > Hi All, > This was a fantastic edition of Pycon India!! Thank you all for pulling it > off. It was a complete improvement in all aspects when compared to last > year. The organizers have taken all the feedback from previous years and > ensured improvement. > > Quality of the talks, the venue and the facilities - there is no area that > was not improved over the previous years. We may not be absolutely perfect > yet (especially regarding quality of a few talks), but we have come a long > way. > > We even had novel initiatives like Python Month and Panel Discussion this > year which stood out. I also think limiting the number of tracks helped in > better coordination and arrangement. Having dedicated workshops also helped. > > All organizers and volunteers, take a bow. Heartfelt thanks to you all. > Regards, > Abdul Muneer > > -- > Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Mon Sep 2 08:42:50 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:12:50 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Points to ponder Message-ID: <8761ujg1w5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> First of all, Congratulations to everyone involved in running this. The conference was a definite improvement over the past few years. Here are some points I have that we should consider. 1. We need more "heads" that decide all details of each activity. Just like Vishal headed the a/v thing. I'm saying this because for things like open spaces, there were issues like opening up the one on top, A/C in audi 3 etc. These are decisions that Anand and Vijay shouldn't have to bother about. There should be one guy in charge of this and that's that. It will make management much more smooth. 2. We have to keep a note of FAQs people ask. I'm emphasising the "F" in FAQ. One example. Lots of people got confused about the workshop tickets and having to pay separately for them. We should really call them "Python workshops before PyCon India" or something similar and have maybe even have a separate doattend page for them. Anything to make them distinct from the main conference registrations. 3. We need to make the conference more woman friendly. It was better than last time but female participants especially from outside Bangalore asked about things like accomodation, travel etc. These are important and we need to have something in place for them. I'd very much like organisations like pyladies to take a more active role in matters like this. 4. We need to have way more time for the CFP and for talk selection. This time was much better and I think we hit a decent method. Now, we just need to scale it up. 5. Let's open up a small lightning talk registration online before the event starts? Might get more interesting people. 6. More work on panels. Thanks. -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From benignbala at gmail.com Mon Sep 2 08:54:37 2013 From: benignbala at gmail.com (Balachandran Sivakumar) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:24:37 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] This Pycon was Awesome!!! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Abdul Muneer wrote: > Hi All, > This was a fantastic edition of Pycon India!! Thank you all for pulling it > off. It was a complete improvement in all aspects when compared to last > year. The organizers have taken all the feedback from previous years and Exactly what I wanted to say :) Everything was managed really well. Specifically, the venue was excellent. The acoustics a lot lot better than what we had last year. A big thanks and congrats to the organisers and volunteers for their efforts and dedication. > > We even had novel initiatives like Python Month and Panel Discussion this > year which stood out. I also think limiting the number of tracks helped in > better coordination and arrangement. Having dedicated workshops also helped. > The Panel discussion was a very good addition. We probably have to have the discussions on planning it in much wider problems and try to have a panel discussion on the most pertinent issue emerging from those discussions. Thanks again for the initiative and organising it. Separating out the workshops was good. And lot of the presenters, if not all, were people who had prior experience in presenting to a non-trivial sized audience. The venue, food, and organising - everything has improved infinitely. In all, a very nice PyCon. Thanks -- Thank you Balachandran Sivakumar Arise Awake and stop not till the goal is reached. - Swami Vivekananda Mail: benignbala at gmail.com Blog: http://benignbala.wordpress.com/ From palakmathur at gmail.com Mon Sep 2 09:22:33 2013 From: palakmathur at gmail.com (Palak Mathur) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 02:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Inpycon] Points to ponder In-Reply-To: <8761ujg1w5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <8761ujg1w5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > 2. We have to keep a note of FAQs people ask. I'm emphasising the "F" in > FAQ. One example. Lots of people got confused about the workshop > tickets and having to pay separately for them. We should really call > them "Python workshops before PyCon India" or something similar and have > maybe even have a separate doattend page for them. Anything to make them > distinct from the main conference registrations. > I had created a FAQ page for PyCon India 2012. I think most of the questions can be reused. Just check the answers if they incorporate the current scenario or not. Regards, Palak Mathur http://palakmathur.in http://aatmiyata.wordpress.com http://palakclicks.wordpress.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From palakmathur at gmail.com Mon Sep 2 09:23:28 2013 From: palakmathur at gmail.com (Palak Mathur) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 02:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Inpycon] Points to ponder In-Reply-To: References: <8761ujg1w5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Palak Mathur wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > >> 2. We have to keep a note of FAQs people ask. I'm emphasising the "F" in >> FAQ. One example. Lots of people got confused about the workshop >> tickets and having to pay separately for them. We should really call >> them "Python workshops before PyCon India" or something similar and >> have >> maybe even have a separate doattend page for them. Anything to make >> them >> distinct from the main conference registrations. >> > > I had created a FAQ page for PyCon India 2012. I think most of the > questions can be reused. > Just check the answers if they incorporate the current scenario or not. > Link to the 2012 FAQs:- http://in.pycon.org/2012/faqs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kinitrupti at yahoo.co.in Mon Sep 2 12:04:18 2013 From: kinitrupti at yahoo.co.in (trupti kini) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 18:04:18 +0800 (SGT) Subject: [Inpycon] Points to ponder In-Reply-To: <8761ujg1w5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <8761ujg1w5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <1378116258.93286.YahooMailNeo@web192205.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> >3. We need to make the conference more woman friendly. It was better >???than last time but female participants especially from outside >???Bangalore asked about things like accomodation, travel etc. These are >???important and we need to have something in place for them. I'd very >???much like organisations like pyladies to take a more active role in >???matters like this. Yes this will really help as I had raised this question but ya could manage the accomodation at the last moment. Yes this was the first PyCon I attended and it was really well organised. Will soon write a blog and come with the link here >5. Let's open up a small lightning talk registration online before the >???event starts? Might get more interesting people. > Yes looking forward to listen or might present next time. >6. More work on panels.? I agree > >Thanks. > >-- >Cordially, >Noufal >http://nibrahim.net.in From dhruvbaldawa at gmail.com Mon Sep 2 14:07:40 2013 From: dhruvbaldawa at gmail.com (Dhruv Baldawa) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 17:37:40 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] [gsoc-india] Re: A BoF session about Google Summer of Code at PyConIndia tomorrow In-Reply-To: <6181efe9-01ff-4e1b-a822-4fde54efcbfd@googlegroups.com> References: <6181efe9-01ff-4e1b-a822-4fde54efcbfd@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: Hi, It was awesome meeting everyone at PyCon. Sarup, can you make the spreadsheet you created earlier public ? Everyone can add/update their details accordingly. -- Dhruv Baldawa (http://www.dhruvb.com) On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Anuj Deshpande wrote: > Could we have the group photo posted here ? > > > On Saturday, August 31, 2013 11:55:18 PM UTC+5:30, Amber Jain wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I hope that everyone who was a PyCon India today enjoyed it a lot (like I >> did). >> >> I'm a Google Summer of Code 2012 intern. I met over a dozen fellow >> GSoCers at PyCon India today. I'm sure that there are other ex-GSoC interns >> roaming around at PyConIndia's venue. Dhananjay (another ex-GSoCer) >> suggested to do a BoF [1] session to talk about GSoC. All current/past GSoC >> interns/mentors (as well as those who are interested in applying to GSoC in >> future) are invited. I guess this will be the first time GSoC interns from >> different years and from different states of India will be together at one >> place. >> >> Please note, afaik, you can only attend PyCon India if you purchased a >> ticket from http://in.pycon.org/2013/. I'm sorry but we can't do >> anything about this. Please make sure that you have a PyCon India ticket >> before you plan to attend this event. >> >> Date: September 1, 2013 >> Time: 12:15pm >> Venue: PyCon India Open Space (Auditorium 3 at NIMHANS Convention Center: >> https://maps.google.com/maps?**q=NIMHANS+convention+centre+** >> bangalore&t=m&z=13 >> ). >> >> See you there! >> >> >> [0] http://www.google-melange.com/**gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013 >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Birds_of_a_feather_%**28computing%29 >> >> -- >> Amber Jain >> i.ambe... at gmail.com >> http://amberj.devio.us/ >> > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Summer of Code - Indian Community" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to gsoc-india+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gsoc-india. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sbanskota08 at gmail.com Mon Sep 2 14:36:48 2013 From: sbanskota08 at gmail.com (Sarup Banskota) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 18:06:48 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] [gsoc-india] Re: A BoF session about Google Summer of Code at PyConIndia tomorrow In-Reply-To: References: <6181efe9-01ff-4e1b-a822-4fde54efcbfd@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: > > Hi, > It was awesome meeting everyone at PyCon. Sarup, can you make the > spreadsheet you created earlier public ? Everyone can add/update their > details accordingly. > Done! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From modi.konark at gmail.com Mon Sep 2 16:02:05 2013 From: modi.konark at gmail.com (konark modi) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 19:32:05 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Points to ponder In-Reply-To: <8761ujg1w5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <8761ujg1w5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Was an amazing conference, I have had one of the best experiences of being part as a volunteer and work with a great and super awesome team which I would cherish for long. Was looking forward for some insights from the organizing team on : 1. Which are the areas of bottle neck during the initial planning because of which kind of get delayed in starting , if we could help reduce those bottle necks, involve more people probably we can start with lot of things early. 2. Kiran had given a useful suggestion on maintain a hand-book via PyCon git repo, to push all check-lists. (I'll be doing that for all the templates used for volunteering purposes.) 3. If we start early we can break the tasks into chunks and let focused groups work on them, otherwise we end up having same people work on lot of different things, which makes it tough on them. Will update as and when have more ideas. Regards Konark On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > > First of all, Congratulations to everyone involved in running this. The > conference was a definite improvement over the past few years. > > Here are some points I have that we should consider. > > 1. We need more "heads" that decide all details of each activity. Just > like Vishal headed the a/v thing. I'm saying this because for things > like open spaces, there were issues like opening up the one on top, A/C > in audi 3 etc. These are decisions that Anand and Vijay shouldn't > have to bother about. There should be one guy in charge of this and > that's that. It will make management much more smooth. > > 2. We have to keep a note of FAQs people ask. I'm emphasising the "F" in > FAQ. One example. Lots of people got confused about the workshop > tickets and having to pay separately for them. We should really call > them "Python workshops before PyCon India" or something similar and have > maybe even have a separate doattend page for them. Anything to make them > distinct from the main conference registrations. > > 3. We need to make the conference more woman friendly. It was better > than last time but female participants especially from outside > Bangalore asked about things like accomodation, travel etc. These are > important and we need to have something in place for them. I'd very > much like organisations like pyladies to take a more active role in > matters like this. > > 4. We need to have way more time for the CFP and for talk > selection. This time was much better and I think we hit a decent > method. Now, we just need to scale it up. > > 5. Let's open up a small lightning talk registration online before the > event starts? Might get more interesting people. > > 6. More work on panels. > > Thanks. > > -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From me at bibhas.in Tue Sep 3 06:41:04 2013 From: me at bibhas.in (Bibhas) Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:11:04 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Points to ponder In-Reply-To: References: <8761ujg1w5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: konark modi wrote: >Was an amazing conference, I have had one of the best experiences of >being >part as a volunteer and work with a great and super awesome team which >I >would cherish for long. > >Was looking forward for some insights from the organizing team on : > >1. Which are the areas of bottle neck during the initial planning >because >of which kind of get delayed in starting , if we could help reduce >those >bottle necks, involve more people probably we can start with lot of >things >early. > >2. Kiran had given a useful suggestion on maintain a hand-book via >PyCon >git repo, to push all check-lists. (I'll be doing that for all the >templates used for volunteering purposes.) > We thought of doing it last year, called it PyCon handbook but it got lost in discussions. I think we should start as soon as possible with this, before our memories betray us. >3. If we start early we can break the tasks into chunks and let focused >groups work on them, otherwise we end up having same people work on lot >of >different things, which makes it tough on them. > >Will update as and when have more ideas. > >Regards >Konark > > >On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Noufal Ibrahim >wrote: > >> >> First of all, Congratulations to everyone involved in running this. >The >> conference was a definite improvement over the past few years. >> >> Here are some points I have that we should consider. >> >> 1. We need more "heads" that decide all details of each activity. >Just >> like Vishal headed the a/v thing. I'm saying this because for >things >> like open spaces, there were issues like opening up the one on >top, A/C >> in audi 3 etc. These are decisions that Anand and Vijay shouldn't >> have to bother about. There should be one guy in charge of this >and >> that's that. It will make management much more smooth. >> >> 2. We have to keep a note of FAQs people ask. I'm emphasising the "F" >in >> FAQ. One example. Lots of people got confused about the workshop >> tickets and having to pay separately for them. We should really >call >> them "Python workshops before PyCon India" or something similar >and have >> maybe even have a separate doattend page for them. Anything to >make them >> distinct from the main conference registrations. >> >> 3. We need to make the conference more woman friendly. It was better >> than last time but female participants especially from outside >> Bangalore asked about things like accomodation, travel etc. These >are >> important and we need to have something in place for them. I'd >very >> much like organisations like pyladies to take a more active role >in >> matters like this. >> >> 4. We need to have way more time for the CFP and for talk >> selection. This time was much better and I think we hit a decent >> method. Now, we just need to scale it up. >> >> 5. Let's open up a small lightning talk registration online before >the >> event starts? Might get more interesting people. >> >> 6. More work on panels. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> Cordially, >> Noufal >> http://nibrahim.net.in >> _______________________________________________ >> Inpycon mailing list >> Inpycon at python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Inpycon mailing list >Inpycon at python.org >http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. From dhruvbaldawa at gmail.com Tue Sep 3 12:23:24 2013 From: dhruvbaldawa at gmail.com (Dhruv Baldawa) Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:53:24 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Points to ponder In-Reply-To: References: <8761ujg1w5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Someone had created it last year. I think Anand C. https://github.com/pythonindia/pyconindia-handbook -- Dhruv Baldawa (http://www.dhruvb.com) On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Bibhas wrote: > > > konark modi wrote: > >Was an amazing conference, I have had one of the best experiences of > >being > >part as a volunteer and work with a great and super awesome team which > >I > >would cherish for long. > > > >Was looking forward for some insights from the organizing team on : > > > >1. Which are the areas of bottle neck during the initial planning > >because > >of which kind of get delayed in starting , if we could help reduce > >those > >bottle necks, involve more people probably we can start with lot of > >things > >early. > > > >2. Kiran had given a useful suggestion on maintain a hand-book via > >PyCon > >git repo, to push all check-lists. (I'll be doing that for all the > >templates used for volunteering purposes.) > > > > We thought of doing it last year, called it PyCon handbook but it got lost > in discussions. I think we should start as soon as possible with this, > before our memories betray us. > > >3. If we start early we can break the tasks into chunks and let focused > >groups work on them, otherwise we end up having same people work on lot > >of > >different things, which makes it tough on them. > > > >Will update as and when have more ideas. > > > >Regards > >Konark > > > > > >On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Noufal Ibrahim > >wrote: > > > >> > >> First of all, Congratulations to everyone involved in running this. > >The > >> conference was a definite improvement over the past few years. > >> > >> Here are some points I have that we should consider. > >> > >> 1. We need more "heads" that decide all details of each activity. > >Just > >> like Vishal headed the a/v thing. I'm saying this because for > >things > >> like open spaces, there were issues like opening up the one on > >top, A/C > >> in audi 3 etc. These are decisions that Anand and Vijay shouldn't > >> have to bother about. There should be one guy in charge of this > >and > >> that's that. It will make management much more smooth. > >> > >> 2. We have to keep a note of FAQs people ask. I'm emphasising the "F" > >in > >> FAQ. One example. Lots of people got confused about the workshop > >> tickets and having to pay separately for them. We should really > >call > >> them "Python workshops before PyCon India" or something similar > >and have > >> maybe even have a separate doattend page for them. Anything to > >make them > >> distinct from the main conference registrations. > >> > >> 3. We need to make the conference more woman friendly. It was better > >> than last time but female participants especially from outside > >> Bangalore asked about things like accomodation, travel etc. These > >are > >> important and we need to have something in place for them. I'd > >very > >> much like organisations like pyladies to take a more active role > >in > >> matters like this. > >> > >> 4. We need to have way more time for the CFP and for talk > >> selection. This time was much better and I think we hit a decent > >> method. Now, we just need to scale it up. > >> > >> 5. Let's open up a small lightning talk registration online before > >the > >> event starts? Might get more interesting people. > >> > >> 6. More work on panels. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> -- > >> Cordially, > >> Noufal > >> http://nibrahim.net.in > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Inpycon mailing list > >> Inpycon at python.org > >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > >> > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Inpycon mailing list > >Inpycon at python.org > >http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anandology at gmail.com Fri Sep 6 13:36:56 2013 From: anandology at gmail.com (Anand Chitipothu) Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 17:06:56 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] PyCon India 2013 - Videos Message-ID: Hello everyone, We did a good job of recording and processing videos this year. The best videos we had so far at any PyCon India. Thanks to HasGeek for their support and video volunteers without whom this wouldn't be possible. There were 21 talks, 2 keynotes and one panel discussion, a total of 24 sessions. The video of one talk, "Scaling Telephony with Python: The Plivo Learnings" by Nishad Musthafa was corrupted and we couldn't recover it. I've processed all other videos and uploaded 11 of them to youtube. http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6GW05BfqWIdsaaV35jcHWPWTI-DAw6Yn Remaining 12, I've given to Vishal for uploading. They will be uploaded in next couple of days. Anand -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vinayakh at gmail.com Fri Sep 6 13:45:15 2013 From: vinayakh at gmail.com (Vinayak Hegde) Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 17:15:15 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] PyCon India 2013 - Videos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > We did a good job of recording and processing videos this year. The best > videos we had so far at any PyCon India. Thanks to HasGeek for their > support and video volunteers without whom this wouldn't be possible. > > There were 21 talks, 2 keynotes and one panel discussion, a total of 24 > sessions. > > The video of one talk, "Scaling Telephony with Python: The Plivo > Learnings" by Nishad Musthafa was corrupted and we couldn't recover it. > > I've processed all other videos and uploaded 11 of them to youtube. > > http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6GW05BfqWIdsaaV35jcHWPWTI-DAw6Yn > > Remaining 12, I've given to Vishal for uploading. They will be uploaded in > next couple of days. > Thanks Anand (and other volunteers). Can these be put up on pyvideos. You can submit a conference here - http://pyvideo.org/suggestions/videos A lot more people will have access to that and the complete list can be imported as RSS using that. -- Vinayak -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anandpillai at letterboxes.org Fri Sep 6 13:45:54 2013 From: anandpillai at letterboxes.org (Anand B Pillai) Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 17:15:54 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] PyCon India 2013 - Videos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5229C072.1010304@letterboxes.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 06 September 2013 05:06 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > Hello everyone, > > We did a good job of recording and processing videos this year. The > best videos we had so far at any PyCon India. Thanks to HasGeek for > their support and video volunteers without whom this wouldn't be > possible. > > There were 21 talks, 2 keynotes and one panel discussion, a total > of 24 sessions. > > The video of one talk, "Scaling Telephony with Python: The Plivo > Learnings" by Nishad Musthafa was corrupted and we couldn't recover > it. > > I've processed all other videos and uploaded 11 of them to > youtube. > > http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6GW05BfqWIdsaaV35jcHWPWTI-DAw6Yn > > Remaining 12, I've given to Vishal for uploading. They will be > uploaded in next couple of days. What about workshops ? Is it covered in this list ? > > Anand > > > > _______________________________________________ Inpycon mailing > list Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > - -- Regards, - --Anand - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Software Architect/Consultant anandpillai at letterboxes.org Please note my updated email address . Kindly update your address books. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSKcBxAAoJEMTxYeOp9eaoirMH/3mCpezZVvsC/Q2PerwPkoDN w8Yt1DSJ6ePL3ycpgRPB8NVqAA3ISWDoEDFMzR+1TsNnugnefQtzGETsSh5hv2Rq PrLNqEeu8cIzLcVqHKx6K0/zGxdGn9u48Jng12BQMBkxweyWgvrjdpay3EmVq0KS FoJmhYA3rXqMQj+5fK4c0I1j8eJJokbgkfjTkeL3Bm8FitW0Pg3oC1f+rBi8ng0h vgcX8UGxGvCY/vCBfmQNDVjtl7mvOksBSGHd4BJ66Gj5tmubt5jQK47LZK1ByiSI dbuqUqI4+K5scKoQRpAHBTQkheMQ1Dih3d575tZTTDN7xFNTBPnOblSvQKZMkXI= =qHAl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From anandology at gmail.com Fri Sep 6 14:02:20 2013 From: anandology at gmail.com (Anand Chitipothu) Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 17:32:20 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] PyCon India 2013 - Videos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > Thanks Anand (and other volunteers). Can these be put up on pyvideos. You > can submit a conference here - http://pyvideo.org/suggestions/videos > > A lot more people will have access to that and the complete list can be > imported as RSS using that. > That was my plan too. But I don't think I'll be able to able to work on it now. Already spent 3 days on processing videos. Can someone please take care of this? Anand -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anandology at gmail.com Fri Sep 6 13:52:07 2013 From: anandology at gmail.com (Anand Chitipothu) Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 17:22:07 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] PyCon India 2013 - Videos In-Reply-To: <5229C072.1010304@letterboxes.org> References: <5229C072.1010304@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: > What about workshops ? Is it covered in this list ? > We managed to record only 2 workshop sessions. Haven't processed them yet. Our initial plan was to use the workshops for test run and identify all issues with the recording and that helped us a lot in identifying and correcting the issues. Anand -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From modi.konark at gmail.com Fri Sep 6 15:28:52 2013 From: modi.konark at gmail.com (konark modi) Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 18:58:52 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] PyCon India 2013 - Videos In-Reply-To: References: <5229C072.1010304@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: Hi All, Although not much aware what the process is for uploading the videos to PyVideo.org, but once all the videos are up on the you tube channel, I can take it up and give it a try. Regards Konark On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > > What about workshops ? Is it covered in this list ? >> > > We managed to record only 2 workshop sessions. Haven't processed them yet. > > Our initial plan was to use the workshops for test run and identify all > issues with the recording and that helped us a lot in identifying and > correcting the issues. > > Anand > > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Fri Sep 6 16:40:09 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 20:10:09 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] PyCon India 2013 - Videos In-Reply-To: <5229C072.1010304@letterboxes.org> (Anand B. Pillai's message of "Fri, 06 Sep 2013 17:15:54 +0530") References: <5229C072.1010304@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: <87hadyqaie.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Anand B Pillai writes: [...] >> Remaining 12, I've given to Vishal for uploading. They will be >> uploaded in next couple of days. > > What about workshops ? Is it covered in this list ? Were they recorded at all? [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From vinayakh at gmail.com Fri Sep 6 20:43:23 2013 From: vinayakh at gmail.com (Vinayak Hegde) Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 00:13:23 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] PyCon India 2013 - Videos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > > > Thanks Anand (and other volunteers). Can these be put up on pyvideos. You >> can submit a conference here - http://pyvideo.org/suggestions/videos >> >> A lot more people will have access to that and the complete list can be >> imported as RSS using that. >> > > That was my plan too. But I don't think I'll be able to able to work on it > now. Already spent 3 days on processing videos. Can someone please take > care of this? > I can help with this. Can someone notify me when all the videos have been uploaded and added to a playlist. I will add the submission to the pyvideos site. -- Vinayak -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nigelbabu at gmail.com Sun Sep 8 10:30:55 2013 From: nigelbabu at gmail.com (Nigel Babu) Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 14:00:55 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Suggestions for the next PyCon Message-ID: <20130908083053.GA28353@gmail.com> Hi there, PyCon was great and congratulations to the organizers and volunteers. I want to bring up a few things I thought we should think of doing before I forget. * Actually conference being on Friday and Saturday. This is probably a bit debatable. We'd have people needing to take a day off from work or college on Friday to attend. But the advantage is that people get a day off to recover instead of heading back to work or college directly on Monday. * Schedule printed on a sheet small enough to carry. We had a large pouch for the ID card. If the schedule was printed small enough to fit in there, that'd have been incredibly useful. I know this is challenging enough with last minute changes, but just a thought. * Schedule stuck outside the halls and in the common areas. I only noticed the schedule outside the main auditorium. It'd have been nice to have it displayed near the second one as well. * A separate page on the website with a very lightweight schedule. I'm thinking on the lines of a text file. Conference internet can be a little unspectacular. It'd be nice to be able to see the schedule even on slow internet. Nigel. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From anandology at gmail.com Sun Sep 22 12:27:38 2013 From: anandology at gmail.com (Anand Chitipothu) Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:57:38 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy Message-ID: Hi, Just came across this blog post by Jesse Noller explaining why everybody pays for PyCon. http://jessenoller.com/blog/2011/05/25/pycon-everybody-pays At this year's PyCon India, some speakers were upset that they have to pay for the conference. I think we should make this point very clear from the beginning. Also, at the end of that post, there is a section on percentage splits of the total costs. It'll be nice to see similar split for PyCon India 2013 expenses. Anand -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sree at mahiti.org Mon Sep 23 05:28:48 2013 From: sree at mahiti.org (Sreekanth S Rameshaiah) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 08:58:48 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 22 September 2013 15:57, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > At this year's PyCon India, some speakers were upset that they have to pay > for the conference. I think we should make this point very clear from the > beginning. I think we should not make speaker pay the registration fees. Thats the least we can do you make them feel welcome to the venue. If they have already paid, we should offer them refunds. Its up to them to choose not to. - sree - sree -- Sreekanth S Rameshaiah Executive Director Mahiti Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Bangalore, India - 560043 Phone: +91 80 4905 8444 Mobile: +91 98455 12611 www.mahiti.org www.mahiti-infotech.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foss.mailinglists at gmail.com Mon Sep 23 07:09:30 2013 From: foss.mailinglists at gmail.com (sankarshan) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:39:30 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > http://jessenoller.com/blog/2011/05/25/pycon-everybody-pays this states: "So, how does "everybody pays" play into this? In two ways. First, it helps hedge our risk, institutionally speaking. PyCon had a good/bad year in 2009 - good for the attendees, but horrendously bad financially. We made various commitments in 2008 just as the markets were peaking, and we lost a lot of money when everything went south. Since then, it has been our budget policy to make sure that our revenues will cover our hard costs even if there is a 15% dip in attendance and a 35% dip in sponsorship. Second, you may have guessed that the "everybody pays" policy allows us to pad the financial aid budget. This has the direct benefit of bringing more people to the conference, increasing the diversity of people attending, getting a larger proportion of the community together, etc." > At this year's PyCon India, some speakers were upset that they have to pay > for the conference. I think we should make this point very clear from the > beginning. In light of the above quote, why were speakers upset that they have to pay? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay From anandpillai at letterboxes.org Mon Sep 23 10:13:18 2013 From: anandpillai at letterboxes.org (Anand B Pillai) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:43:18 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <523FF81E.4030205@letterboxes.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 23 September 2013 10:39 AM, sankarshan wrote: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Anand Chitipothu > wrote: > >> http://jessenoller.com/blog/2011/05/25/pycon-everybody-pays > > this states: > > "So, how does "everybody pays" play into this? In two ways. First, > it helps hedge our risk, institutionally speaking. PyCon had a > good/bad year in 2009 - good for the attendees, but horrendously > bad financially. We made various commitments in 2008 just as the > markets were peaking, and we lost a lot of money when everything > went south. Since then, it has been our budget policy to make sure > that our revenues will cover our hard costs even if there is a 15% > dip in attendance and a 35% dip in sponsorship. > > Second, you may have guessed that the "everybody pays" policy > allows us to pad the financial aid budget. This has the direct > benefit of bringing more people to the conference, increasing the > diversity of people attending, getting a larger proportion of the > community together, etc." > >> At this year's PyCon India, some speakers were upset that they >> have to pay for the conference. I think we should make this point >> very clear from the beginning. > > In light of the above quote, why were speakers upset that they have > to pay? This article was written a while ago but was highlighted recently when there were a few tweets about it. Also we don't officially follow PSF policy blindly and make our own policies. I think as we were not clear and forthright on this as PSF was, there was a thinking that speakers need not pay. We have had some discussions in the past on such lines, so to me it is not surprising that there was such a feeling. Please note that PSSI is an independent organization with its own policies - we definitely use PSF policies as guidelines and references but don't automatically subscribe to them. I hope this is very clear. > > - -- Regards, - --Anand - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Software Architect/Consultant anandpillai at letterboxes.org Please note my updated email address . Kindly update your address books. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSP/geAAoJEMTxYeOp9eaoVhIH/joInu0gm/aR4oMrWSN+oA6t +2CcBwY9IvqLgqyMp04m6zAUsU31XCE7LA/jcaU5KSzCeOJcvMaGnksRDd4MIAdU HlnyvxFdEWrt9isvMAR4NdWjVi2Xx+Arw6/guPgTUx58/xYHJZvx7h060b07H2xA zz8q5Gd/iJMoztbpmjQ8XEQgUxFbj6+pEv4ISCnjZC70r2qj5HvK7ltl+eUUyR36 Vct1dED3tG55lCjkt3H8fJTEBaL52B828TGwT6ek+5QOk4VV/YOVIq3iRtdzpS7Y LwwUy+DAeVZffbvRHEwpfOHNnC1oiasbUxnO/3NB2ho2Kd8LIJEgYWsERIGTSvQ= =VVmF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From sree at mahiti.org Mon Sep 23 10:15:00 2013 From: sree at mahiti.org (Sreekanth S Rameshaiah) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:45:00 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <523FF81E.4030205@letterboxes.org> References: <523FF81E.4030205@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: On 23 September 2013 13:43, Anand B Pillai wrote: > Please note that PSSI is an independent organization with its > own policies - we definitely use PSF policies as guidelines and > references but don't automatically subscribe to them. I hope > this is very clear. > +1. We should have policies that map to our local context. - sree -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Mon Sep 23 10:15:33 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:45:33 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <523FF81E.4030205@letterboxes.org> (Anand B. Pillai's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:43:18 +0530") References: <523FF81E.4030205@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: <87siwwuf6i.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Anand B Pillai writes: [...] > This article was written a while ago but was highlighted recently when > there were a few tweets about it. Also we don't officially follow PSF > policy blindly and make our own policies. > > I think as we were not clear and forthright on this as PSF was, there > was a thinking that speakers need not pay. We have had some > discussions in the past on such lines, so to me it is not surprising > that there was such a feeling. > > Please note that PSSI is an independent organization with its own > policies - we definitely use PSF policies as guidelines and references > but don't automatically subscribe to them. I hope this is very clear. Agreed. I do, however, like the "everyone pays" policy. It keeps the management simple and the whole affair clear and transparent. [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From anandology at gmail.com Mon Sep 23 10:39:02 2013 From: anandology at gmail.com (Anand Chitipothu) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:09:02 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87siwwuf6i.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <523FF81E.4030205@letterboxes.org> <87siwwuf6i.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > Anand B Pillai writes: > > > [...] > > > This article was written a while ago but was highlighted recently when > > there were a few tweets about it. Also we don't officially follow PSF > > policy blindly and make our own policies. > > > > I think as we were not clear and forthright on this as PSF was, there > > was a thinking that speakers need not pay. We have had some > > discussions in the past on such lines, so to me it is not surprising > > that there was such a feeling. > > > > Please note that PSSI is an independent organization with its own > > policies - we definitely use PSF policies as guidelines and references > > but don't automatically subscribe to them. I hope this is very clear. > > Agreed. > > I do, however, like the "everyone pays" policy. It keeps the management > simple and the whole affair clear and transparent. > I too think "everyone pays" is a nice policy. It really brings out the community sprit, everyone is equal at the conference. organizers, speakers and volunteers are not privileged. Anand -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lifeofnavin at gmail.com Mon Sep 23 12:31:20 2013 From: lifeofnavin at gmail.com (Navin Pai) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:01:20 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy Message-ID: > Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:09:02 +0530 > From: Anand Chitipothu > To: Mailing list for the PyCon India conference > Subject: Re: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy > Message-ID: > 5XXae2tGnHs0CZciZa+C7rUoDzgJ+g at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Noufal Ibrahim >wrote: > > > Anand B Pillai writes: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > This article was written a while ago but was highlighted recently when > > > there were a few tweets about it. Also we don't officially follow PSF > > > policy blindly and make our own policies. > > > > > > I think as we were not clear and forthright on this as PSF was, there > > > was a thinking that speakers need not pay. We have had some > > > discussions in the past on such lines, so to me it is not surprising > > > that there was such a feeling. > > > > > > Please note that PSSI is an independent organization with its own > > > policies - we definitely use PSF policies as guidelines and references > > > but don't automatically subscribe to them. I hope this is very clear. > > > > Agreed. > > > > I do, however, like the "everyone pays" policy. It keeps the management > > simple and the whole affair clear and transparent. > > > > I too think "everyone pays" is a nice policy. It really brings out the > community sprit, everyone is equal at the conference. organizers, speakers > and volunteers are not privileged. > > Anand > +1 to that Anand. But somewhere, I understand the sentiment of not having speakers pay. Especially when we have student speakers, for whom money is tight. I remember a couple conferences which gave speakers free entry, which enabled me, then in my UG years to speak and learn at conferences which I doubt I'd have been able to even attend, given the costs, otherwise. Then again, as the article mentions, that's more suitable for corporate oriented confs. There is probably a better way, such as student discounts, to tackle the issue better. Would love to have more thoughts on this... Thanks Navin "M at dMAx" Pai -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Mon Sep 23 12:35:32 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:05:32 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (Navin Pai's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:01:20 +0530") References: Message-ID: <87hadbvn9n.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Navin Pai writes: [...] > +1 to that Anand. But somewhere, I understand the sentiment of not > having speakers pay. Especially when we have student speakers, for > whom money is tight. I remember a couple conferences which gave > speakers free entry, which enabled me, then in my UG years to speak > and learn at conferences which I doubt I'd have been able to even > attend, given the costs, otherwise. This is better served by some kind of student scholarships. If there are too many requests, we can prioritise student speakers. > Then again, as the article mentions, that's more suitable for > corporate oriented confs. There is probably a better way, such as > student discounts, to tackle the issue better. Exactly. [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From anandpillai at letterboxes.org Mon Sep 23 12:52:14 2013 From: anandpillai at letterboxes.org (Anand B Pillai) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:22:14 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87hadbvn9n.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87hadbvn9n.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <52401D5E.8020001@letterboxes.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 23 September 2013 04:05 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > Navin Pai writes: > > > [...] > >> +1 to that Anand. But somewhere, I understand the sentiment of >> not having speakers pay. Especially when we have student >> speakers, for whom money is tight. I remember a couple >> conferences which gave speakers free entry, which enabled me, >> then in my UG years to speak and learn at conferences which I >> doubt I'd have been able to even attend, given the costs, >> otherwise. > > This is better served by some kind of student scholarships. If > there are too many requests, we can prioritise student speakers. In my mind, we do need to offer some kind of rebate for those in need. The simplest way to do this would be to waive off registration amount for speakers who cannot afford to spend it - say student speakers for example. This can be done by announcing financial aid for attendees with priority to speakers/students (hence higher for speaker students) and doing this much before we announce registrations. Financial aid would be limited of course and done on a first cum first serve basis for the deserving. > > >> Then again, as the article mentions, that's more suitable for >> corporate oriented confs. There is probably a better way, such >> as student discounts, to tackle the issue better. I would rather call it as general financial support than student specific discount. Hence though "everyone pays" as a general rule, the "deserving can be exempt" as well. > Exactly. [...] > > - -- Regards, - --Anand - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Software Architect/Consultant anandpillai at letterboxes.org Please note my updated email address . Kindly update your address books. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSQB1eAAoJEMTxYeOp9eaoPSMH/RaFLydeH+sglwSlv2fZTUHt NtAoSkRazzdXB56JUdrqhlTvvB9QWrKd48osYT124Fi0YcddXBeOmfm8B1kNob+S PrAFTytp/7Kc8b+BLv+6gNvcs2hLDugpf62/vwWd76/ZPNM76yr5H0GZafNTQH5/ +vy1oL5sdv5wAoB2Dcpw1tKkbT0+Eyov5g03CKBzU8F3txSx1yATgiqteO2O9wZ8 d7lTCpPicTL209Jh+6NiNij27glfrXZrLbz5WFAVJ1FKzB1TsSVXjyopkwqRF6ny 4XV8ROyswq9rPqnpB0mz9pujvFbRH/Urru3u+F1EiX+ZCe5DTWY0Xxg3HK8+o1A= =Ct2U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From sree at mahiti.org Mon Sep 23 13:24:54 2013 From: sree at mahiti.org (Sreekanth S Rameshaiah) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:54:54 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 23 September 2013 16:01, Navin Pai wrote: > Then again, as the article mentions, that's more suitable for corporate > oriented confs. There is probably a better way, such as student discounts, > to tackle the issue better. > > Would love to have more thoughts on this... > We should have a field in task submission form where the speaker can request for discount in registration. - sree -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kushaldas at gmail.com Mon Sep 23 15:00:03 2013 From: kushaldas at gmail.com (Kushal Das) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:30:03 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87siwwuf6i.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <523FF81E.4030205@letterboxes.org> <87siwwuf6i.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > > Agreed. > > I do, however, like the "everyone pays" policy. It keeps the management > simple and the whole affair clear and transparent. My vote will also go to the "everyone pays" policy. Kushal -- http://fedoraproject.org http://kushaldas.in From mehul.n.ved at gmail.com Mon Sep 23 15:12:34 2013 From: mehul.n.ved at gmail.com (Mehul Ved) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:42:34 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <523FF81E.4030205@letterboxes.org> <87siwwuf6i.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Kushal Das wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: >> >> Agreed. >> >> I do, however, like the "everyone pays" policy. It keeps the management >> simple and the whole affair clear and transparent. > My vote will also go to the "everyone pays" policy. +1 on everyone pays policy. And +1 to deserving attendees getting scholarship, with first preference given to speakers. As has been discussed before, this will also ensure a clear distinction on what attendees are paying for and what sponsors are paying for. From baiju.m.mail at gmail.com Mon Sep 23 21:54:29 2013 From: baiju.m.mail at gmail.com (Baiju M) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 01:24:29 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <523FF81E.4030205@letterboxes.org> <87siwwuf6i.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: +1 for "everyone pays" On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Kushal Das wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: >> >> Agreed. >> >> I do, however, like the "everyone pays" policy. It keeps the management >> simple and the whole affair clear and transparent. > My vote will also go to the "everyone pays" policy. > > Kushal > -- > http://fedoraproject.org > http://kushaldas.in > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon From gautham5678 at gmail.com Tue Sep 24 06:05:32 2013 From: gautham5678 at gmail.com (Gautam) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:35:32 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I agree with the everyone pays policy. This works really well because the cost of a ticket is quite nominal at 1k. I think most students can come up with that. Offering student discounts is an option though. On 23 September 2013 16:01, Navin Pai wrote: > >> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:09:02 +0530 >> From: Anand Chitipothu >> To: Mailing list for the PyCon India conference >> Subject: Re: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy >> Message-ID: >> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Noufal Ibrahim >> wrote: >> >> > Anand B Pillai writes: >> > >> > >> > [...] >> > >> > > This article was written a while ago but was highlighted recently when >> > > there were a few tweets about it. Also we don't officially follow PSF >> > > policy blindly and make our own policies. >> > > >> > > I think as we were not clear and forthright on this as PSF was, there >> > > was a thinking that speakers need not pay. We have had some >> > > discussions in the past on such lines, so to me it is not surprising >> > > that there was such a feeling. >> > > >> > > Please note that PSSI is an independent organization with its own >> > > policies - we definitely use PSF policies as guidelines and references >> > > but don't automatically subscribe to them. I hope this is very clear. >> > >> > Agreed. >> > >> > I do, however, like the "everyone pays" policy. It keeps the management >> > simple and the whole affair clear and transparent. >> > >> >> I too think "everyone pays" is a nice policy. It really brings out the >> community sprit, everyone is equal at the conference. organizers, speakers >> and volunteers are not privileged. >> >> Anand > > > +1 to that Anand. But somewhere, I understand the sentiment of not having > speakers pay. Especially when we have student speakers, for whom money is > tight. I remember a couple conferences which gave speakers free entry, which > enabled me, then in my UG years to speak and learn at conferences which I > doubt I'd have been able to even attend, given the costs, otherwise. > > Then again, as the article mentions, that's more suitable for corporate > oriented confs. There is probably a better way, such as student discounts, > to tackle the issue better. > > Would love to have more thoughts on this... > > Thanks > Navin "M at dMAx" Pai > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > From foss.mailinglists at gmail.com Tue Sep 24 07:55:09 2013 From: foss.mailinglists at gmail.com (sankarshan) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:25:09 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <523FF81E.4030205@letterboxes.org> References: <523FF81E.4030205@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Anand B Pillai wrote: > Please note that PSSI is an independent organization with its > own policies - we definitely use PSF policies as guidelines and > references but don't automatically subscribe to them. I hope > this is very clear. I wasn't suggesting otherwise. The rationale for why I like "everyone pays" is that payment is linked with generating a pass and, hence the logistics of participants (and, lunch etc) are all kept aligned. Deserving candidates can be identified via a well defined policy that is defined and in place. The refund for the ticket can be included in the financial aid provided. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay From jace at pobox.com Thu Sep 26 06:30:06 2013 From: jace at pobox.com (Kiran Jonnalagadda) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:00:06 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > At this year's PyCon India, some speakers were upset that they have to pay > for the conference. I think we should make this point very clear from the > beginning. > I was the keynote speaker and I bought a ticket too. Kiran -- Kiran Jonnalagadda http://jace.zaiki.in http://hasgeek.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Thu Sep 26 06:36:02 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:06:02 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (Kiran Jonnalagadda's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:00:06 +0530") References: Message-ID: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Kiran Jonnalagadda writes: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Anand Chitipothu > wrote: > >> At this year's PyCon India, some speakers were upset that they have >> to pay for the conference. I think we should make this point very >> clear from the beginning. >> > > I was the keynote speaker and I bought a ticket too. I imagine you did that since it's similar to hasgeek policy. Were you made aware from the site or anything else that you would have to pay even though you're a speaker? [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From jace at pobox.com Thu Sep 26 07:46:29 2013 From: jace at pobox.com (Kiran Jonnalagadda) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:16:29 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > > I was the keynote speaker and I bought a ticket too. > > I imagine you did that since it's similar to hasgeek policy. > Were you made aware from the site or anything else that you would have > to pay even though you're a speaker? > HasGeek policy is free tickets for speakers and crew. I bought a ticket because I knew it was PyCon policy -- I bought a ticket even last year despite volunteering. Kiran -- Kiran Jonnalagadda http://jace.zaiki.in http://hasgeek.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Thu Sep 26 07:48:55 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:18:55 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (Kiran Jonnalagadda's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:16:29 +0530") References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Kiran Jonnalagadda writes: [...] > HasGeek policy is free tickets for speakers and crew. I wasn't aware of that. > I bought a ticket because I knew it was PyCon policy -- I bought a > ticket even last year despite volunteering. There's still gap in the communication. Anand told me about one or two speakers who were annoyed that they had to pay even though their talks were selected. [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 08:02:53 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:32:53 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Hi, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > Kiran Jonnalagadda writes: > > > [...] > > > HasGeek policy is free tickets for speakers and crew. > > I wasn't aware of that. > > > I bought a ticket because I knew it was PyCon policy -- I bought a > > ticket even last year despite volunteering. > > > There's still gap in the communication. Anand told me about one or two > speakers who were annoyed that they had to pay even though their talks > were selected. > > > > [...] > > > -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > Who & why was it decided to charge fees for volunteers and speakers? Is it because sponsorship money not sufficient? Is there any blog/mail provides description/info about the overall expenditure of the event? If money is real issue please get a new sponsorship model in place which handles entry fee payments for speakers and volunteers specifically. When most of the volunteers are students & some speakers as well. Some of them are coming from other part of country & planning stay/food on their own. Can we not do best by giving them entry to the event? Comparing an Indian event with event in US & following with same footprint does not go well here. An event with focus on Indian crowd should be handled in Indian way. Thanks, -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Thu Sep 26 08:06:25 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:36:25 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (atul jha's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:32:53 +0530") References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> atul jha writes: [...] > Who & why was it decided to charge fees for volunteers and speakers? > > Is it because sponsorship money not sufficient? Is there any blog/mail > provides description/info about the overall expenditure of the event? > > If money is real issue please get a new sponsorship model in place which > handles entry fee payments for speakers and volunteers specifically. The main idea is that we don't want to dependent on sponsor money too much to take care of the conference. I don't think we're tight any more so other options to subsidise this are available. > When most of the volunteers are students & some speakers as well. Some > of them are coming from other part of country & planning stay/food on > their own. Can we not do best by giving them entry to the event? We can do better by giving them some kind of student scholarships as was brought up earlier. [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 08:15:40 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:45:40 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Hi, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > atul jha writes: > > > [...] > > > > Who & why was it decided to charge fees for volunteers and speakers? > > > > Is it because sponsorship money not sufficient? Is there any blog/mail > > provides description/info about the overall expenditure of the event? > > > > If money is real issue please get a new sponsorship model in place which > > handles entry fee payments for speakers and volunteers specifically. > > The main idea is that we don't want to dependent on sponsor money too > much to take care of the conference. I don't think we're tight any more > so other options to subsidise this are available. > Well then simply make it more welcoming & if a speaker or volunteers wants to pay for ticket let them do it else make it free for others. Why wasting so much time on this? > > > When most of the volunteers are students & some speakers as well. Some > > of them are coming from other part of country & planning stay/food on > > their own. Can we not do best by giving them entry to the event? > > We can do better by giving them some kind of student scholarships as was > brought up earlier. > > > Well this is something different from entry ticket, the scholarship should not be restricted to speakers & volunteer students. Both the things are separate and needs to be addressed in specific way. Are we going to give a student 800RS entry ticket for event and call it scholarship? [...] > > > -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Thu Sep 26 08:24:09 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:54:09 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (atul jha's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:45:40 +0530") References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> atul jha writes: [...] > Well then simply make it more welcoming & if a speaker or volunteers > wants to pay for ticket let them do it else make it free for > others. Why wasting so much time on this? First of all, it's not "wasting" time. It's something that's undecided and which has become a topic of discussion. Secondly, it's a matter of policy. People ask questions and there needs to be something that's previously discussed, agreed upon and published that you can simply point to rather than handle individual queries. There are always freeloaders who carry a box from the door to a room and then ask for a volunteer badge just to avoid paying a ticket. There are also volunteers (like most of the serious ones) who actually bought a ticket. There are also other issues like speakers not being announced till late in the day season when the early bird tickets are sold out. If they wait till then, they will have to pay full price if their talks are not selected. [...] > Well this is something different from entry ticket, the scholarship > should not be restricted to speakers & volunteer students. I'm still not sure about who the "scholarship" (for want of a better term) should be applicable to. I'm not sure if it should be applicable for everyone. I'm also reasonably sure, though, that students, especially outstation ones, should be given priority over the others. > Both the things are separate and needs to be addressed in specific > way. I think I see your point. Correct me if I'm wrong but You're proposing waiving the ticket fee for speakers and volunteers as a sign of friendliness rather than financial assistance. I never thought of it that way. > Are we going to give a student 800RS entry ticket for event and call > it scholarship? Don't know. We've not yet reached implementation. This is just design. [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 08:38:40 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:08:40 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Hi, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > atul jha writes: > > > [...] > > > > Well then simply make it more welcoming & if a speaker or volunteers > > wants to pay for ticket let them do it else make it free for > > others. Why wasting so much time on this? > > First of all, it's not "wasting" time. It's something that's undecided > and which has become a topic of discussion. Secondly, it's a matter of > policy. People ask questions and there needs to be something that's > previously discussed, agreed upon and published that you can simply > point to rather than handle individual queries. > Pycon is a community event not a event for profit. Don`t blindly follow policies of other country things work differently here. > > There are always freeloaders who carry a box from the door to a room and > then ask for a volunteer badge just to avoid paying a ticket. There are > also volunteers (like most of the serious ones) who actually bought a > ticket. > > Are you saying to be a serious volunteer you need to pay for entry ticket? Its organizers responsibility to not select freeloaders. There are also other issues like speakers not being announced till late > in the day season when the early bird tickets are sold out. If they wait > till then, they will have to pay full price if their talks are not > selected. > > How difficult is it to pay cheques to speakers in that case? > > [...] > > > Well this is something different from entry ticket, the scholarship > > should not be restricted to speakers & volunteer students. > > I'm still not sure about who the "scholarship" (for want of a better > term) should be applicable to. I'm not sure if it should be applicable > for everyone. I'm also reasonably sure, though, that students, > especially outstation ones, should be given priority over the others. > > And i doubt it will work out. > > Both the things are separate and needs to be addressed in specific > > way. > > I think I see your point. Correct me if I'm wrong but You're proposing > waiving the ticket fee for speakers and volunteers as a sign of > friendliness rather than financial assistance. I never thought of it > that way. > > Well you yourself said money is not the reason for charging. Friendliness is one of the things including 100 others. > > Are we going to give a student 800RS entry ticket for event and call > > it scholarship? > > Don't know. We've not yet reached implementation. This is just design. > > Well if its entry fee weaver don`t call it scholarship. > > [...] > > > -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Thu Sep 26 08:48:06 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:18:06 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (atul jha's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:08:40 +0530") References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> atul jha writes: [...] > Pycon is a community event not a event for profit. Don`t blindly > follow policies of other country things work differently here. As somone who's been involved in organising this for a while, I'm not "blindly" following anything. I genuinely think "everyone pays" is a good idea regardless of who came up with it. Also, we're not looking to generate profit but an event does have costs. We want to cover those in a way that allows us freedom to conduct the event as we wish. To illustrate with an extreme case, if a sponsor said that they'd pay us a crore for branding the conference with their name and giving them the contact information of all the participation, we'd be able to to give free entry to every delegate and do everything in style but we'd say no. [...] > Its organizers responsibility to not select freeloaders. The devil is in the details. If you have concrete suggestions on how to identify and weed out freeloaders without destroying the volunteer base, please post them here. Or better yet, pick up the job of volunteer coordinator. After all, advice is cheap. >> How difficult is it to pay cheques to speakers in that case? Very very difficult. Like I said, the devil is in the details. [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 08:56:57 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:26:57 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Noufal, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > atul jha writes: > > > [...] > > > Pycon is a community event not a event for profit. Don`t blindly > > follow policies of other country things work differently here. > > As somone who's been involved in organising this for a while, I'm not > "blindly" following anything. I genuinely think "everyone pays" is a > good idea regardless of who came up with it. > > Well its "YOU" not community. That is why someone raised the issue. > Also, we're not looking to generate profit but an event does have > costs. We want to cover those in a way that allows us freedom to conduct > the event as we wish. > > Is there a financial details about overall conference expenditure? This will help everyone understand how difficult it will be if we start giving free entry to speakers and volunteers. > To illustrate with an extreme case, if a sponsor said that they'd pay us > a crore for branding the conference with their name and giving them the > contact information of all the participation, we'd be able to to give > free entry to every delegate and do everything in style but we'd say no. > Well define a solid WHAT YOU WILL GET IF YOU SPONSOR RULE > > [...] > > > Its organizers responsibility to not select freeloaders. > > The devil is in the details. > > If you have concrete suggestions on how to identify and weed out > freeloaders without destroying the volunteer base, please post them > here. Or better yet, pick up the job of volunteer coordinator. After > all, advice is cheap. > Great i will be volunteer coordinator for next event on condition the entry fee will be free for them. :) > > > >> How difficult is it to pay cheques to speakers in that case? > > Very very difficult. Like I said, the devil is in the details. > Why? Is the event not run by a society? How difficult it is to issue cheques? > > > [...] > > > -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Thu Sep 26 09:05:47 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:35:47 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (atul jha's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:26:57 +0530") References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <877ge4gj04.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> I'm stepping out of this thread. Real life calls. Your point about being welcoming against the financial part is a good takeaway. Thanks. -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From anandpillai at letterboxes.org Thu Sep 26 09:10:54 2013 From: anandpillai at letterboxes.org (Anand B Pillai) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:40:54 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <5243DDFE.5080108@letterboxes.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 26 September 2013 12:18 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > atul jha writes: > > > [...] > >> Pycon is a community event not a event for profit. Don`t >> blindly follow policies of other country things work differently >> here. I generally agree with this principle of not blindly following American policy here. I think I did mention it ealier when this discussion opened saying PSSI frames its own policies. We do need to frame local policies keeping in mind the Indian ethos. > > As somone who's been involved in organising this for a while, I'm > not "blindly" following anything. I genuinely think "everyone pays" > is a good idea regardless of who came up with it. > > Also, we're not looking to generate profit but an event does have > costs. We want to cover those in a way that allows us freedom to > conduct the event as we wish. > > To illustrate with an extreme case, if a sponsor said that they'd > pay us a crore for branding the conference with their name and > giving them the contact information of all the participation, we'd > be able to to give free entry to every delegate and do everything > in style but we'd say no. > > [...] > >> Its organizers responsibility to not select freeloaders. It is probably not a good idea to give free entry to volunteers. I kind of agree with the "Everybody pays" policy here. Though I think volunteers should not pay the full price but should get some benefit of tiered pricing. I would rather suggest to reserve a certain section of early bird tickets for volunteers and co-ordinators instead. For example if the early bird ticket volume size is "N" it should be made rather N + V where V is the volunteer/co-ordinator population size. Keep this as a separate early bird category. We can identify volunteers using their email IDs early on and only allow those email addresses to book from this slot. This might be a way to avoid freeloaders. > > The devil is in the details. > > If you have concrete suggestions on how to identify and weed out > freeloaders without destroying the volunteer base, please post > them here. Or better yet, pick up the job of volunteer coordinator. > After all, advice is cheap. > > >>> How difficult is it to pay cheques to speakers in that case? > > Very very difficult. Like I said, the devil is in the details. A way to solve this would again be to ask speakers to pay up front and then refund the speakers who gave talks at the end of the conference. Again something not too easy with the details but possibly a way to identify speakers might be when they register - I think PyCon US does this - You can register as a regular attendee or a speaker. I think we need to tweak the "Everybody pays policy" to suit our local expectations. > > > [...] > > - -- Regards, - --Anand - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Software Architect/Consultant anandpillai at letterboxes.org Please note my updated email address . Kindly update your address books. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSQ93+AAoJEMTxYeOp9eaosFQH/3PYdRKRj1hrUHCQUZXrLcpC 8n0NMEY3Btp5JTFJdA7565SB7a4v//AbMpivItxdQODj4Hp1+wVKddz/pmUK3OZw VhjkWHJFZ8wr7mEwej0559ZF18F7NbJTj0clz+ZeFXa3txvJyH5up88o5Rpa5SOo X8KUrHMJNS4oqsSJ8xspfV0bMJWBovR2V9ceobfjvYfnQChnsluxGuDRkywftZhr QrIxwz9l9EFTcScmHpw+noLqe3sFJkr4x0Au1tlk6V9tJElhwPf5SiO+uUoTuXj6 lRh9vQnWZjMDSVbj0wABTT4Fh0s9+1vtRaN90yOEBVy6T98LVQFvzOeOHvabPQ4= =m6LP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 09:11:07 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:41:07 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <877ge4gj04.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <877ge4gj04.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Hi, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > > I'm stepping out of this thread. Real life calls. > Ya in other words I & organizers will do it in our way. People from community should stop discussing about it. > > Your point about being welcoming against the financial part is a good > takeaway. Thanks. > > Only if anyone writes. > -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 09:14:52 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:44:52 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <5243DDFE.5080108@letterboxes.org> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <5243DDFE.5080108@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: Anand, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Anand B Pillai < anandpillai at letterboxes.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday 26 September 2013 12:18 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > > atul jha writes: > > > > > > [...] > > > >> Pycon is a community event not a event for profit. Don`t > >> blindly follow policies of other country things work differently > >> here. > > I generally agree with this principle of not blindly following > American policy here. I think I did mention it ealier when > this discussion opened saying PSSI frames its own policies. > > We do need to frame local policies keeping in mind the Indian ethos. > > > > > As somone who's been involved in organising this for a while, I'm > > not "blindly" following anything. I genuinely think "everyone pays" > > is a good idea regardless of who came up with it. > > > > Also, we're not looking to generate profit but an event does have > > costs. We want to cover those in a way that allows us freedom to > > conduct the event as we wish. > > > > To illustrate with an extreme case, if a sponsor said that they'd > > pay us a crore for branding the conference with their name and > > giving them the contact information of all the participation, we'd > > be able to to give free entry to every delegate and do everything > > in style but we'd say no. > > > > [...] > > > >> Its organizers responsibility to not select freeloaders. > > It is probably not a good idea to give free entry to volunteers. > I kind of agree with the "Everybody pays" policy here. Though > I think volunteers should not pay the full price but should > get some benefit of tiered pricing. > > I would rather suggest to reserve a certain section of early bird > tickets for volunteers and co-ordinators instead. For example > if the early bird ticket volume size is "N" it should be made > rather N + V where V is the volunteer/co-ordinator population > size. Keep this as a separate early bird category. > > We can identify volunteers using their email IDs early on > and only allow those email addresses to book from this slot. > > This might be a way to avoid freeloaders. > > > > > The devil is in the details. > > > > If you have concrete suggestions on how to identify and weed out > > freeloaders without destroying the volunteer base, please post > > them here. Or better yet, pick up the job of volunteer coordinator. > > After all, advice is cheap. > > > > > >>> How difficult is it to pay cheques to speakers in that case? > > > > Very very difficult. Like I said, the devil is in the details. > > A way to solve this would again be to ask speakers to pay up > front and then refund the speakers who gave talks at the end of > the conference. Again something not too easy with the details > but possibly a way to identify speakers might be when they > register - I think PyCon US does this - You can register > as a regular attendee or a speaker. > > I think we need to tweak the "Everybody pays policy" to suit > our local expectations. > > Is any takers for this? I doubt. > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > - -- > Regards, > > - --Anand > > - > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Software Architect/Consultant > anandpillai at letterboxes.org > > Please note my updated email address . > Kindly update your address books. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSQ93+AAoJEMTxYeOp9eaosFQH/3PYdRKRj1hrUHCQUZXrLcpC > 8n0NMEY3Btp5JTFJdA7565SB7a4v//AbMpivItxdQODj4Hp1+wVKddz/pmUK3OZw > VhjkWHJFZ8wr7mEwej0559ZF18F7NbJTj0clz+ZeFXa3txvJyH5up88o5Rpa5SOo > X8KUrHMJNS4oqsSJ8xspfV0bMJWBovR2V9ceobfjvYfnQChnsluxGuDRkywftZhr > QrIxwz9l9EFTcScmHpw+noLqe3sFJkr4x0Au1tlk6V9tJElhwPf5SiO+uUoTuXj6 > lRh9vQnWZjMDSVbj0wABTT4Fh0s9+1vtRaN90yOEBVy6T98LVQFvzOeOHvabPQ4= > =m6LP > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jace at pobox.com Thu Sep 26 09:34:55 2013 From: jace at pobox.com (Kiran Jonnalagadda) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:04:55 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:32 AM, atul jha wrote: > An event with focus on Indian crowd should be handled in Indian way. > I actually think PyCon charging everyone including speakers is a good idea. We're mixing up multiple concerns here, so let me try to separate them: *1. The notion that students need subsidy because they can't afford commercial rates.* Any conference the size of PyCon India charging < Rs 2000 per day is not at a commercial rate. It's not even at a sustainable rate. For comparison, here are some commercially priced events: Agile India 2014: Rs 10,000 *per day* http://booking.agilefaqs.com/agile-india-2014 UX India 2013: Rs 10,000 http://2013.ux-india.org/pricedetails JSConf Asia in Manila: PHP 19,500, SGD 560, ~INR 28,000 http://2013.jsconf.asia/ The Phillippine peso used to be 1:1 with the Indian rupee until a couple years ago and the purchasing power parity is the same, so it's the equivalent of spending 28k on a ticket in India. With prices like these, subsidies make sense. PyCon India tickets sold at Rs 800 and complaining about that is honestly shameful. Nobody who has the time and inclination to attend PyCon India is so poor they can't afford Rs 800 on a ticket. None of these people will complain that the restaurant they had lunch at did not sponsor it. *2. Speakers and crew are paying with their time and effort, so taking their cash is charging them extra.* This is a valid point, but a double edged sword. When you give someone free entry and a speaker badge, you mark them as special and above the crowd. The speaker-audience divide encourages formality, where speakers are announced in advance, their names and talk blurbs are used to sell tickets, and schedules are fixed and adhered to. What you lose is spontaneity. You can't have an open session where anyone may speak up because the audience will see it as a gap in the schedule, not an opportunity for them to step up and speak (unless it's a single track event and there is nowhere else to go for that period). You can't fix this by selecting flash talks in advance because those speakers will expect free tickets too, and free tickets are not free for the organizers. The per-head costs still have to be paid for. Spontaneity is good for a community. Class divisions are not. *3. PyCon has sponsor money anyway, so why should individuals pay?* First of all, all money isn't the same. Sponsor money is not a donation. Sponsors expect their pound of flesh. If you want to see what a sponsor-paid event looks like, look at Directi's HTTPX conference: http://bigrockhttpx.net/ http://bigrockhttpx.net/mumbai http://bigrockhttpx.net/delhi These events were free for attendees, but it's incredibly hard to tell which session is led by an independent community member and which by a sponsor representative. For what's labeled as a "definite event", is there anything on the schedule that looks like someone who's pushing the boundaries and is there to reveal their work to the world? (Not dissing Directi, it is their first attempt and they'll no doubt improve with each iteration.) PyCon has an independent voice because it doesn't have to worry about sponsor expectations (one of: recruitment, selling their product, or finding new clients). When you give up participant money and become dependent on sponsor money, you also make the transition from serving participants to instead selling participants to sponsors -- and nobody is interested in students who have neither money nor well developed skills, so a sponsor-subsidised student-friendly event is actually self-defeating. PyCon's independence depends on people paying for their tickets. There is no way around this. Second, there is sponsor money coming in anyway, from sponsors who manage to benefit without demanding too much. IMHO, this money should not be spent on PyCon itself. It should be directed towards supporting the growth of the Python community *beyond* PyCon. *4. Management overheads.* The more twists you add to the story, the more overhead you'll have in explaining this to people. Is your ticket free or not? If you buy a ticket and your talk is selected, will your ticket be refunded or not? If you didn't buy a ticket and didn't get selected, can you get a discount code to buy at the early bird price since you proposed to speak back then? What if you spoke in an open session? Do you get a refund? Carrying cash is difficult, can you pay by card at the venue? Can PyCon also cover your travel and stay since you are a poor student? Answering questions is a full-time job, sometimes even requiring two people. Simple rules go a long way towards eliminating such hidden costs. My 2b. Kiran -- Kiran Jonnalagadda http://jace.zaiki.in http://hasgeek.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foss.mailinglists at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 09:48:11 2013 From: foss.mailinglists at gmail.com (sankarshan) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:18:11 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <5243DDFE.5080108@letterboxes.org> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <5243DDFE.5080108@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Anand B Pillai wrote: > I generally agree with this principle of not blindly following > American policy here. I think I did mention it ealier when > this discussion opened saying PSSI frames its own policies. > > We do need to frame local policies keeping in mind the Indian ethos. Is the total number of tickets sold linked with any other pieces? For example, does the number of tickets sold relate to the head-count for lunch/coffee/swags etc. I had earlier suggested that "Everyone pays" and, if individuals are identified as worthy of a "financial aid", the aid package could include the cost of the ticket as well. That would allow you to have a definite head-count and also keep the aid pieces well documented. I am unfamiliar with how the number of tickets sold is relevant in the conference. So it is entirely possible that my above explanation is misplaced and inane. And, I am somewhat puzzled in the thread - is the question that the students are unable to bear the entire expense ie. tickets+travel+lodging? Merely subsidizing a ticket will then not help by much. And, perhaps be counter productive. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay From me at bibhas.in Thu Sep 26 09:42:07 2013 From: me at bibhas.in (BibhasD) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:12:07 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <5243E54F.2000705@bibhas.in> I agree to what Noufal and Kiran just said. I have been attending the event for 3 years now and have been a volunteer for 2 of them. And I'm also from outside Bangalore, and was a student when I started. We volunteer because we want to. That's the whole point of volunteering at the first place. Not because we might get free stuffs. And I'm pretty sure if someone can travel thousand km to attend the event, can pay Rs.800 for a ticket. I personally like the idea of everybody paying. That means we're not giving anyone special treatment just because they are speakers and volunteers. Maybe We can make a financial aid program for speakers who *really needs it*, not *wants it*, but that should be the boundary of it. I really dont know why those speakers wanted free tickets. And about the freeloaders(which is kind of vague term), making the entry free would invite even more of them. And I *really* don't want it to happen. It adds a lot more headache than it should take care of. Thanks Bibhas On Thursday 26 September 2013 12:26 PM, atul jha wrote: > Noufal, > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > >> atul jha writes: >> >> >> [...] >> >>> Pycon is a community event not a event for profit. Don`t blindly >>> follow policies of other country things work differently here. >> As somone who's been involved in organising this for a while, I'm not >> "blindly" following anything. I genuinely think "everyone pays" is a >> good idea regardless of who came up with it. >> >> Well its "YOU" not community. That is why someone raised the issue. >> Also, we're not looking to generate profit but an event does have >> costs. We want to cover those in a way that allows us freedom to conduct >> the event as we wish. >> >> Is there a financial details about overall conference expenditure? This > will help everyone understand how difficult it will be if we start giving > free entry to speakers and volunteers. > > >> To illustrate with an extreme case, if a sponsor said that they'd pay us >> a crore for branding the conference with their name and giving them the >> contact information of all the participation, we'd be able to to give >> free entry to every delegate and do everything in style but we'd say no. >> > Well define a solid WHAT YOU WILL GET IF YOU SPONSOR RULE > >> [...] >> >>> Its organizers responsibility to not select freeloaders. >> The devil is in the details. >> >> If you have concrete suggestions on how to identify and weed out >> freeloaders without destroying the volunteer base, please post them >> here. Or better yet, pick up the job of volunteer coordinator. After >> all, advice is cheap. >> > Great i will be volunteer coordinator for next event on condition the entry > fee will be free for them. :) > >> >>>> How difficult is it to pay cheques to speakers in that case? >> Very very difficult. Like I said, the devil is in the details. >> > Why? Is the event not run by a society? How difficult it is to issue > cheques? > > >> >> [...] >> >> >> -- >> Cordially, >> Noufal >> http://nibrahim.net.in >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foss.mailinglists at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 09:49:58 2013 From: foss.mailinglists at gmail.com (sankarshan) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:19:58 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <877ge4gj04.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:41 PM, atul jha wrote: > Ya in other words I & organizers will do it in our way. People from > community should stop discussing about it. I'd request that you not make such assumptions and nor attempt to draw conclusions that are not supported from the original email. You have participated in a discussion and, have been participating. However, there also needs to be a proposal which can be discussed. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay From sree at mahiti.org Thu Sep 26 09:51:51 2013 From: sree at mahiti.org (Sreekanth S Rameshaiah) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:21:51 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <5243DDFE.5080108@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: Hi, We are compiling the expenses and income. It will be made public. We are yet to receive few sponsorship fees and finish left out payouts ( specifically to those who conducted the workshop). There is no organisers vs community here. Every one is welcome to come together to create this event and make this a great experience. There is always a call for volunteers and every year some one stands up runs the event. Requesting all to focus on issues at hand and not translate every thread into a personal attack. - sree On 26 September 2013 12:44, atul jha wrote: > Anand, > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Anand B Pillai < > anandpillai at letterboxes.org> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On Thursday 26 September 2013 12:18 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: >> > atul jha writes: >> > >> > >> > [...] >> > >> >> Pycon is a community event not a event for profit. Don`t >> >> blindly follow policies of other country things work differently >> >> here. >> >> I generally agree with this principle of not blindly following >> American policy here. I think I did mention it ealier when >> this discussion opened saying PSSI frames its own policies. >> >> We do need to frame local policies keeping in mind the Indian ethos. >> >> > >> > As somone who's been involved in organising this for a while, I'm >> > not "blindly" following anything. I genuinely think "everyone pays" >> > is a good idea regardless of who came up with it. >> > >> > Also, we're not looking to generate profit but an event does have >> > costs. We want to cover those in a way that allows us freedom to >> > conduct the event as we wish. >> > >> > To illustrate with an extreme case, if a sponsor said that they'd >> > pay us a crore for branding the conference with their name and >> > giving them the contact information of all the participation, we'd >> > be able to to give free entry to every delegate and do everything >> > in style but we'd say no. >> > >> > [...] >> > >> >> Its organizers responsibility to not select freeloaders. >> >> It is probably not a good idea to give free entry to volunteers. >> I kind of agree with the "Everybody pays" policy here. Though >> I think volunteers should not pay the full price but should >> get some benefit of tiered pricing. >> >> I would rather suggest to reserve a certain section of early bird >> tickets for volunteers and co-ordinators instead. For example >> if the early bird ticket volume size is "N" it should be made >> rather N + V where V is the volunteer/co-ordinator population >> size. Keep this as a separate early bird category. >> >> We can identify volunteers using their email IDs early on >> and only allow those email addresses to book from this slot. >> >> This might be a way to avoid freeloaders. >> >> > >> > The devil is in the details. >> > >> > If you have concrete suggestions on how to identify and weed out >> > freeloaders without destroying the volunteer base, please post >> > them here. Or better yet, pick up the job of volunteer coordinator. >> > After all, advice is cheap. >> > >> > >> >>> How difficult is it to pay cheques to speakers in that case? >> > >> > Very very difficult. Like I said, the devil is in the details. >> >> A way to solve this would again be to ask speakers to pay up >> front and then refund the speakers who gave talks at the end of >> the conference. Again something not too easy with the details >> but possibly a way to identify speakers might be when they >> register - I think PyCon US does this - You can register >> as a regular attendee or a speaker. >> >> I think we need to tweak the "Everybody pays policy" to suit >> our local expectations. >> >> Is any takers for this? > I doubt. > > >> > >> > >> > [...] >> > >> > >> >> >> - -- >> Regards, >> >> - --Anand >> >> - >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Software Architect/Consultant >> anandpillai at letterboxes.org >> >> Please note my updated email address . >> Kindly update your address books. >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ >> >> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSQ93+AAoJEMTxYeOp9eaosFQH/3PYdRKRj1hrUHCQUZXrLcpC >> 8n0NMEY3Btp5JTFJdA7565SB7a4v//AbMpivItxdQODj4Hp1+wVKddz/pmUK3OZw >> VhjkWHJFZ8wr7mEwej0559ZF18F7NbJTj0clz+ZeFXa3txvJyH5up88o5Rpa5SOo >> X8KUrHMJNS4oqsSJ8xspfV0bMJWBovR2V9ceobfjvYfnQChnsluxGuDRkywftZhr >> QrIxwz9l9EFTcScmHpw+noLqe3sFJkr4x0Au1tlk6V9tJElhwPf5SiO+uUoTuXj6 >> lRh9vQnWZjMDSVbj0wABTT4Fh0s9+1vtRaN90yOEBVy6T98LVQFvzOeOHvabPQ4= >> =m6LP >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> _______________________________________________ >> Inpycon mailing list >> Inpycon at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon >> > > > > -- > Atul > > www.atuljha.com > > irc(freenode) : koolhead17 > > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > > -- Sreekanth S Rameshaiah Executive Director Mahiti Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Bangalore, India - 560043 Phone: +91 80 4905 8444 Mobile: +91 98455 12611 www.mahiti.org www.mahiti-infotech.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 09:54:52 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:24:52 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <877ge4gj04.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Sankarshan, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:19 PM, sankarshan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:41 PM, atul jha wrote: > > Ya in other words I & organizers will do it in our way. People from > > community should stop discussing about it. > > I'd request that you not make such assumptions and nor attempt to draw > conclusions that are not supported from the original email. You have > participated in a discussion and, have been participating. However, > there also needs to be a proposal which can be discussed. > > I would hope the discussion this time leads to a correct/right conclusion instead going to a cold box & we wake up again next year months before the event. -- > sankarshan mukhopadhyay > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 09:57:25 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:27:25 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <5243DDFE.5080108@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:18 PM, sankarshan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Anand B Pillai > wrote: > > I generally agree with this principle of not blindly following > > American policy here. I think I did mention it ealier when > > this discussion opened saying PSSI frames its own policies. > > > > We do need to frame local policies keeping in mind the Indian ethos. > > Is the total number of tickets sold linked with any other pieces? For > example, does the number of tickets sold relate to the head-count for > lunch/coffee/swags etc. > > I had earlier suggested that "Everyone pays" and, if individuals are > identified as worthy of a "financial aid", the aid package could > include the cost of the ticket as well. That would allow you to have a > definite head-count and also keep the aid pieces well documented. > > I am unfamiliar with how the number of tickets sold is relevant in the > conference. So it is entirely possible that my above explanation is > misplaced and inane. > > And, I am somewhat puzzled in the thread - is the question that the > students are unable to bear the entire expense ie. > tickets+travel+lodging? Merely subsidizing a ticket will then not help > by much. And, perhaps be counter productive. > > > Totally. Don`t restrict the "SCHOLARSHIP" to mare entry fees. Help those who requires the Aid to participate in the event. Everyone pays should not be mandatory thrown to everyone. > -- > sankarshan mukhopadhyay > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anandpillai at letterboxes.org Thu Sep 26 10:11:58 2013 From: anandpillai at letterboxes.org (Anand B Pillai) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:41:58 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <877ge4gj04.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <5243EC4E.3010406@letterboxes.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 26 September 2013 01:24 PM, atul jha wrote: > Sankarshan, > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:19 PM, sankarshan > wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:41 PM, atul jha >> wrote: >>> Ya in other words I & organizers will do it in our way. People >>> from community should stop discussing about it. >> >> I'd request that you not make such assumptions and nor attempt to >> draw conclusions that are not supported from the original email. >> You have participated in a discussion and, have been >> participating. However, there also needs to be a proposal which >> can be discussed. >> >> I would hope the discussion this time leads to a correct/right >> conclusion > instead going to a cold box & we wake up again next year months > before the event. +1 Shouldn't do that. That is one thing should start happening more in this list. We should try and conclude discussions with some kind of summary of the general direction of the discussion that can be applied for next year's PyCon. Otherwise this is all just academic - right ? > > -- >> sankarshan mukhopadhyay >> _______________________________________________ Inpycon mailing >> list Inpycon at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Inpycon mailing > list Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > - -- Regards, - --Anand - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Software Architect/Consultant anandpillai at letterboxes.org Please note my updated email address . Kindly update your address books. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSQ+xOAAoJEMTxYeOp9eao4aQIALAgHlZ6MO6aiFg2ZnaQ0+10 VF5jbut8JUr16sO9ve9xFKZRWffH6SremE8qp243/QLwvIotmoc6bQrb9AntBfzJ ToNfJ1LIY9yRBSPHHNGepcpP1UAEgHfSxnOkgEaaJeP3jT1tMl3iOoNcUlivbbhS dM+k3R+6AZMBBX252Wq3kpf2t8MSbVRac3hl0EEQGEpVeWE5RzCFRaiKQf7o9faG cLPPEjaJrdJANq43tjgPJ/fpoK5nAvUiFEiE19f4YbnGMJBEfIcXbaRPp+cQJIrE ySpLLkzO2pdqf8gTvslBqwwb0VNjinC/SOVrZQJHI0+NjgJYnFRV3LuA0HheEiE= =2ANG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 10:18:11 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:48:11 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <5243DDFE.5080108@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: Hi, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Sreekanth S Rameshaiah wrote: > Hi, > We are compiling the expenses and income. It will be made public. We are > yet to receive few sponsorship fees and finish left out payouts ( > specifically to those who conducted the workshop). > > Awesome. > There is no organisers vs community here. Every one is welcome to come > together to create this event and make this a great experience. > > Great > There is always a call for volunteers and every year some one stands up > runs the event. > > We know that. > Requesting all to focus on issues at hand and not translate every thread > into a personal attack. > > Indeed. I would hope everyone here represents community not an individual & not push/throw his personal opinion but whats is good for overall community. - sree > > > > > > > On 26 September 2013 12:44, atul jha wrote: > >> Anand, >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Anand B Pillai < >> anandpillai at letterboxes.org> wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On Thursday 26 September 2013 12:18 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: >>> > atul jha writes: >>> > >>> > >>> > [...] >>> > >>> >> Pycon is a community event not a event for profit. Don`t >>> >> blindly follow policies of other country things work differently >>> >> here. >>> >>> I generally agree with this principle of not blindly following >>> American policy here. I think I did mention it ealier when >>> this discussion opened saying PSSI frames its own policies. >>> >>> We do need to frame local policies keeping in mind the Indian ethos. >>> >>> > >>> > As somone who's been involved in organising this for a while, I'm >>> > not "blindly" following anything. I genuinely think "everyone pays" >>> > is a good idea regardless of who came up with it. >>> > >>> > Also, we're not looking to generate profit but an event does have >>> > costs. We want to cover those in a way that allows us freedom to >>> > conduct the event as we wish. >>> > >>> > To illustrate with an extreme case, if a sponsor said that they'd >>> > pay us a crore for branding the conference with their name and >>> > giving them the contact information of all the participation, we'd >>> > be able to to give free entry to every delegate and do everything >>> > in style but we'd say no. >>> > >>> > [...] >>> > >>> >> Its organizers responsibility to not select freeloaders. >>> >>> It is probably not a good idea to give free entry to volunteers. >>> I kind of agree with the "Everybody pays" policy here. Though >>> I think volunteers should not pay the full price but should >>> get some benefit of tiered pricing. >>> >>> I would rather suggest to reserve a certain section of early bird >>> tickets for volunteers and co-ordinators instead. For example >>> if the early bird ticket volume size is "N" it should be made >>> rather N + V where V is the volunteer/co-ordinator population >>> size. Keep this as a separate early bird category. >>> >>> We can identify volunteers using their email IDs early on >>> and only allow those email addresses to book from this slot. >>> >>> This might be a way to avoid freeloaders. >>> >>> > >>> > The devil is in the details. >>> > >>> > If you have concrete suggestions on how to identify and weed out >>> > freeloaders without destroying the volunteer base, please post >>> > them here. Or better yet, pick up the job of volunteer coordinator. >>> > After all, advice is cheap. >>> > >>> > >>> >>> How difficult is it to pay cheques to speakers in that case? >>> > >>> > Very very difficult. Like I said, the devil is in the details. >>> >>> A way to solve this would again be to ask speakers to pay up >>> front and then refund the speakers who gave talks at the end of >>> the conference. Again something not too easy with the details >>> but possibly a way to identify speakers might be when they >>> register - I think PyCon US does this - You can register >>> as a regular attendee or a speaker. >>> >>> I think we need to tweak the "Everybody pays policy" to suit >>> our local expectations. >>> >>> Is any takers for this? >> I doubt. >> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > [...] >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> - -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> - --Anand >>> >>> - >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Software Architect/Consultant >>> anandpillai at letterboxes.org >>> >>> Please note my updated email address . >>> Kindly update your address books. >>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) >>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ >>> >>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSQ93+AAoJEMTxYeOp9eaosFQH/3PYdRKRj1hrUHCQUZXrLcpC >>> 8n0NMEY3Btp5JTFJdA7565SB7a4v//AbMpivItxdQODj4Hp1+wVKddz/pmUK3OZw >>> VhjkWHJFZ8wr7mEwej0559ZF18F7NbJTj0clz+ZeFXa3txvJyH5up88o5Rpa5SOo >>> X8KUrHMJNS4oqsSJ8xspfV0bMJWBovR2V9ceobfjvYfnQChnsluxGuDRkywftZhr >>> QrIxwz9l9EFTcScmHpw+noLqe3sFJkr4x0Au1tlk6V9tJElhwPf5SiO+uUoTuXj6 >>> lRh9vQnWZjMDSVbj0wABTT4Fh0s9+1vtRaN90yOEBVy6T98LVQFvzOeOHvabPQ4= >>> =m6LP >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Inpycon mailing list >>> Inpycon at python.org >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Atul >> >> www.atuljha.com >> >> irc(freenode) : koolhead17 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Inpycon mailing list >> Inpycon at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon >> >> > > > -- > Sreekanth S Rameshaiah > Executive Director > Mahiti Infotech Pvt. Ltd. > Bangalore, India - 560043 > Phone: +91 80 4905 8444 > Mobile: +91 98455 12611 > www.mahiti.org > www.mahiti-infotech.com > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sschivu at yahoo.com Thu Sep 26 10:25:16 2013 From: sschivu at yahoo.com (Srikanth Chivukula) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 01:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Inpycon] unsubscribe me. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1380183916.50375.YahooMailNeo@web121603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> kindly unsubscribe me from this list.... ? Srikanth Chivukula ________________________________ From: Kiran Jonnalagadda To: Mailing list for the PyCon India conference Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 10:30 AM Subject: Re: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: At this year's PyCon India, some speakers were upset that they have to pay for the conference. I think we should make this point very clear from the beginning. I was the keynote speaker and I bought a ticket too. Kiran -- Kiran Jonnalagadda http://jace.zaiki.in http://hasgeek.com _______________________________________________ Inpycon mailing list Inpycon at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sschivu at yahoo.com Thu Sep 26 10:25:16 2013 From: sschivu at yahoo.com (Srikanth Chivukula) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 01:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Inpycon] unsubscribe me. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1380183916.50375.YahooMailNeo@web121603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> kindly unsubscribe me from this list.... ? Srikanth Chivukula ________________________________ From: Kiran Jonnalagadda To: Mailing list for the PyCon India conference Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 10:30 AM Subject: Re: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: At this year's PyCon India, some speakers were upset that they have to pay for the conference. I think we should make this point very clear from the beginning. I was the keynote speaker and I bought a ticket too. Kiran -- Kiran Jonnalagadda http://jace.zaiki.in http://hasgeek.com _______________________________________________ Inpycon mailing list Inpycon at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Thu Sep 26 10:48:24 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:18:24 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <5243EC4E.3010406@letterboxes.org> (Anand B. Pillai's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:41:58 +0530") References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <877ge4gj04.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <5243EC4E.3010406@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: <87k3i4ezon.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Anand B Pillai writes: [...] > Shouldn't do that. That is one thing should start happening more in > this list. We should try and conclude discussions with some kind of > summary of the general direction of the discussion that can be applied > for next year's PyCon. > > Otherwise this is all just academic - right ? [...] My reading of the situation is that the actual people who did the work are tired and want to take a well deserved break and not much action takes place. The talkers get vocal with feedback and suggestions but end up having no time or interest to do any actual work. -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 10:55:54 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:25:54 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87k3i4ezon.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <877ge4gj04.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <5243EC4E.3010406@letterboxes.org> <87k3i4ezon.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > Anand B Pillai writes: > > > [...] > > > Shouldn't do that. That is one thing should start happening more in > > this list. We should try and conclude discussions with some kind of > > summary of the general direction of the discussion that can be applied > > for next year's PyCon. > > > > Otherwise this is all just academic - right ? > > [...] > > My reading of the situation is that the actual people who did the work > are tired and want to take a well deserved break and not much action > takes place. > > > The talkers get vocal with feedback and suggestions but end up having no > time or interest to do any actual work. > > > Are you saying those who are having conversation here have no actual interest in work? -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Thu Sep 26 10:57:47 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:27:47 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (atul jha's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:25:54 +0530") References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <877ge4gj04.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <5243EC4E.3010406@letterboxes.org> <87k3i4ezon.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <87a9j0ez90.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> atul jha writes: [...] > Are you saying those who are having conversation here have no actual > interest in work? [...] No I'm not. -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 11:04:35 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:34:35 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87a9j0ez90.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0i0bi.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <874n98hzhy.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87wqm4gjtl.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <877ge4gj04.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <5243EC4E.3010406@letterboxes.org> <87k3i4ezon.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9j0ez90.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > atul jha writes: > > > [...] > > > Are you saying those who are having conversation here have no actual > > interest in work? > > [...] > > > No I'm not. > > Good for community then. We are open for discussion even when some of us are vacation.. > -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vinayakh at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 11:59:07 2013 From: vinayakh at gmail.com (Vinayak Hegde) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:29:07 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: +1 Kiran has said it better than I could. +1 to Everyone pays. +100 to the fact almost all money from sponsors should be redirected towards sponsoring non-Pycon or allied activities such as running satellite events in other cities, sponsoring Python Month (or similar activities) or running code sprints (talk is cheap, show us the code). The conference should not depend on the sponsor for the long-term health of the community. I would add to the two points that Kiran has made : 1. Value See the amount of value that you get from being a participant, speaker or volunteer. You connect with other like-minded people and work with them. You learn something new or ways of doing things better (something that can be monetized by doing a job better or raising your skills or just the joy of hacking). Now factor in the fact that you will be eating food at the venue (breakfast + lunch + tea). As a speaker, you get to talk about what you learn and generally the off-stage conversations are good. You also get recognition from the community and put it on your resume. Also there used to be a speaker/volunteer party (not sure if this happened this year since I was neither). If you think that INR 800 is not good enough for it (honestly even students can afford this - the cost of two movies or two meals in a good restaurant), maybe you should not come to the event. Don't think of it as a cost, think of it as vote from a community member for things worth doing. 2. Management overheads All the sane opinions that I have heard on this thread are from people who have actually run an event. All of the people running the events have lives and day-jobs. Time spent on the event is time away from job / family / kids / other hobbies / side projects. So time is at a premium. By saying that you should have special rules for categories of people (which require human interface to deal with), you are dissing them by implicitly assuming that their time is less valuable than the participants. It is actually the other way round. The only difference is that these people are motivated to make a difference. IMNSHO, there should be just two categories of tickets 1. Early geek tickets - So that money is paid upfront to fund things that need upfront capex such as video equipment / RFID cards / Venue booking cost etc. This should be capped at some %age of venue capacity (such as 30%). Maybe these have a small discount say 10%. 2. Normal tickets - Rest of the tickets. No refunds but allow people to transfer tickets amongst themselves without involvement from conf organisers. No on-the-spot registration. Pay only by card / Debit card etc. This might seem controversial but in today day and age it is possible to find someone with a card who can pay for you. Keep it Simple Stupid. -- Vinayak On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Kiran Jonnalagadda wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:32 AM, atul jha wrote: > >> An event with focus on Indian crowd should be handled in Indian way. >> > > I actually think PyCon charging everyone including speakers is a good > idea. We're mixing up multiple concerns here, so let me try to separate > them: > > *1. The notion that students need subsidy because they can't afford > commercial rates.* > > Any conference the size of PyCon India charging < Rs 2000 per day is not > at a commercial rate. It's not even at a sustainable rate. For comparison, > here are some commercially priced events: > > Agile India 2014: Rs 10,000 *per day* > http://booking.agilefaqs.com/agile-india-2014 > > UX India 2013: Rs 10,000 > http://2013.ux-india.org/pricedetails > > JSConf Asia in Manila: PHP 19,500, SGD 560, ~INR 28,000 > http://2013.jsconf.asia/ > The Phillippine peso used to be 1:1 with the Indian rupee until a couple > years ago and the purchasing power parity is the same, so it's the > equivalent of spending 28k on a ticket in India. > > With prices like these, subsidies make sense. PyCon India tickets sold at > Rs 800 and complaining about that is honestly shameful. Nobody who has the > time and inclination to attend PyCon India is so poor they can't afford Rs > 800 on a ticket. None of these people will complain that the restaurant > they had lunch at did not sponsor it. > > *2. Speakers and crew are paying with their time and effort, so taking > their cash is charging them extra.* > > This is a valid point, but a double edged sword. When you give someone > free entry and a speaker badge, you mark them as special and above the > crowd. The speaker-audience divide encourages formality, where speakers are > announced in advance, their names and talk blurbs are used to sell tickets, > and schedules are fixed and adhered to. > > What you lose is spontaneity. You can't have an open session where anyone > may speak up because the audience will see it as a gap in the schedule, not > an opportunity for them to step up and speak (unless it's a single track > event and there is nowhere else to go for that period). > > You can't fix this by selecting flash talks in advance because those > speakers will expect free tickets too, and free tickets are not free for > the organizers. The per-head costs still have to be paid for. > > Spontaneity is good for a community. Class divisions are not. > > *3. PyCon has sponsor money anyway, so why should individuals pay?* > > First of all, all money isn't the same. Sponsor money is not a donation. > Sponsors expect their pound of flesh. If you want to see what a > sponsor-paid event looks like, look at Directi's HTTPX conference: > > http://bigrockhttpx.net/ > http://bigrockhttpx.net/mumbai > http://bigrockhttpx.net/delhi > > These events were free for attendees, but it's incredibly hard to tell > which session is led by an independent community member and which by a > sponsor representative. For what's labeled as a "definite event", is there > anything on the schedule that looks like someone who's pushing the > boundaries and is there to reveal their work to the world? (Not dissing > Directi, it is their first attempt and they'll no doubt improve with each > iteration.) > > PyCon has an independent voice because it doesn't have to worry about > sponsor expectations (one of: recruitment, selling their product, or > finding new clients). When you give up participant money and become > dependent on sponsor money, you also make the transition from serving > participants to instead selling participants to sponsors -- and nobody is > interested in students who have neither money nor well developed skills, so > a sponsor-subsidised student-friendly event is actually self-defeating. > > PyCon's independence depends on people paying for their tickets. There is > no way around this. > > Second, there is sponsor money coming in anyway, from sponsors who manage > to benefit without demanding too much. IMHO, this money should not be spent > on PyCon itself. It should be directed towards supporting the growth of the > Python community *beyond* PyCon. > > *4. Management overheads.* > > The more twists you add to the story, the more overhead you'll have in > explaining this to people. Is your ticket free or not? If you buy a ticket > and your talk is selected, will your ticket be refunded or not? If you > didn't buy a ticket and didn't get selected, can you get a discount code to > buy at the early bird price since you proposed to speak back then? What if > you spoke in an open session? Do you get a refund? Carrying cash is > difficult, can you pay by card at the venue? Can PyCon also cover your > travel and stay since you are a poor student? > > Answering questions is a full-time job, sometimes even requiring two > people. Simple rules go a long way towards eliminating such hidden costs. > > My 2b. > > Kiran > > -- > Kiran Jonnalagadda > http://jace.zaiki.in > http://hasgeek.com > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kiran.daredevil at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 12:03:12 2013 From: kiran.daredevil at gmail.com (Kiran Gangadharan) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:33:12 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy Message-ID: Hi, Kiran Jonnalagadda has clearly mentioned as to why "Everybody pays" policy works and why we should move ahead with this. Instead of just debating more and more over this, why not create a simple poll using google forms or something, and see what majority of the people think instead of polluting the mailing lists with all sorts of arguments ? Cheers, Kiran Gangadharan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Thu Sep 26 12:23:37 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:53:37 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (Kiran Gangadharan's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:33:12 +0530") References: Message-ID: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Kiran Gangadharan writes: [...] > why not create a simple poll using google forms or something, and see > what majority of the people think instead of polluting the mailing > lists with all sorts of arguments ? Because democracy, as has been repeatedly proved, is not the best way to make imporant functional decisions. We "argue" constructively and then come to a (semi) consensus. It isn't pollution, it's the purpose of the list. I don't want the opinion of someone who doesn't care about the conference to influence how we run it. Do you? [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 12:53:48 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:23:48 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > Kiran Gangadharan writes: > > > [...] > > > why not create a simple poll using google forms or something, and see > > what majority of the people think instead of polluting the mailing > > lists with all sorts of arguments ? > > > Because democracy, as has been repeatedly proved, is not the best way to > make imporant functional decisions. We "argue" constructively and then > come to a (semi) consensus. It isn't pollution, it's the purpose of the > list. > > Hmm. So you suggesting closed door discussion and then throwing it out loud & claiming it community wants it? > I don't want the opinion of someone who doesn't care about the > conference to influence how we run it. Do you? > > How welcoming are you for advise from someone who wants to help? As Kiran mentioned, its good idea we should conduct a poll & have everyones voice heard, instead of sitting inside a close door and deciding what and how for all. If i/others was/were not part of past event are you doing enough to let us in so we can be there for next event? > [...] > > > -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foss.mailinglists at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 13:02:41 2013 From: foss.mailinglists at gmail.com (sankarshan) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:32:41 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:23 PM, atul jha wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Noufal Ibrahim > wrote: >> Because democracy, as has been repeatedly proved, is not the best way to >> make imporant functional decisions. We "argue" constructively and then >> come to a (semi) consensus. It isn't pollution, it's the purpose of the >> list. >> > > Hmm. So you suggesting closed door discussion and then throwing it out loud > & claiming it community wants it? No. I don't think he did mention that. And, your statement is an interpretation of what he wrote. I would like to default to believe that the event organization which constitutes members from PSSI (and, some how are members of PSF) have the best interests of the Python community in India in their hearts. I sense this thread calling that into question. I do not believe that is healthy. To be able to make changes one needs to participate. Atul, perhaps you need to explore how you can participate in the PyCon India process for the 2014 edition and, thereafter drive the changes you like to see. PSSI has a fiduciary duty to the Python community in India. I do not seem them shirking that role. > >> >> I don't want the opinion of someone who doesn't care about the >> conference to influence how we run it. Do you? >> > > How welcoming are you for advise from someone who wants to help? Creating a poll is one step to helping. The next step is to be able to devise means of assessing the outcome of the poll and, also being able to have ownership of the changes. Ownership and execution requires participation. I think Noufal has earlier alluded to the requirement of individuals stepping up to participate and contribute and not just stay at the first step. > As Kiran mentioned, its good idea we should conduct a poll & have everyones > voice heard, instead of sitting inside a close door and deciding what and > how for all. > > If i/others was/were not part of past event are you doing enough to let us > in so we can be there for next event? I think this is a dangerous assumption to make. I do not see Noufal or, the PSSI gating/preventing anyone to stand up and be counted. If you have specific instances where you feel that your contributions have been actively prevented by the organization or, individuals, I would suggest seeking redress within the PSSI. That would require to be addressed. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 13:09:37 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:39:37 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Sankarshan, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:32 PM, sankarshan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:23 PM, atul jha wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Noufal Ibrahim > > wrote: > > >> Because democracy, as has been repeatedly proved, is not the best way to > >> make imporant functional decisions. We "argue" constructively and then > >> come to a (semi) consensus. It isn't pollution, it's the purpose of the > >> list. > >> > > > > Hmm. So you suggesting closed door discussion and then throwing it out > loud > > & claiming it community wants it? > > No. I don't think he did mention that. And, your statement is an > interpretation of what he wrote. I would like to default to believe > that the event organization which constitutes members from PSSI (and, > some how are members of PSF) have the best interests of the Python > community in India in their hearts. I sense this thread calling that > into question. I do not believe that is healthy. > > To be able to make changes one needs to participate. Atul, perhaps you > need to explore how you can participate in the PyCon India process for > the 2014 edition and, thereafter drive the changes you like to see. > > PSSI has a fiduciary duty to the Python community in India. I do not > seem them shirking that role. > > > > >> > >> I don't want the opinion of someone who doesn't care about the > >> conference to influence how we run it. Do you? > >> > > > > How welcoming are you for advise from someone who wants to help? > > Creating a poll is one step to helping. The next step is to be able to > devise means of assessing the outcome of the poll and, also being able > to have ownership of the changes. Ownership and execution requires > participation. I think Noufal has earlier alluded to the requirement > of individuals stepping up to participate and contribute and not just > stay at the first step. > > > As Kiran mentioned, its good idea we should conduct a poll & have > everyones > > voice heard, instead of sitting inside a close door and deciding what and > > how for all. > > > > If i/others was/were not part of past event are you doing enough to let > us > > in so we can be there for next event? > > I think this is a dangerous assumption to make. I do not see Noufal > or, the PSSI gating/preventing anyone to stand up and be counted. If > you have specific instances where you feel that your contributions > have been actively prevented by the organization or, individuals, I > would suggest seeking redress within the PSSI. That would require to > be addressed. > > > Every single reply of Naufel was as if i have done something really bad by letting my voice in here. All his mails have been totally unwelcoming, which is the reason for outburst. If you are calling yourself an organizer or what not for community you need to have guts to hear everyone & not stereotyping. > > -- > sankarshan mukhopadhyay > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sree at mahiti.org Thu Sep 26 13:08:29 2013 From: sree at mahiti.org (Sreekanth S Rameshaiah) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:38:29 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On 26 September 2013 16:32, sankarshan wrote: > > If i/others was/were not part of past event are you doing enough to let > us > > in so we can be there for next event? > > I think this is a dangerous assumption to make. I do not see Noufal > or, the PSSI gating/preventing anyone to stand up and be counted. If > you have specific instances where you feel that your contributions > have been actively prevented by the organization or, individuals, I > would suggest seeking redress within the PSSI. That would require to > be addressed. Its a community event. No one else has to "do anything to let you in". Please watch threads that discuss the organising of the conference, come and pick up task that works for you and help the community run the event. - sree -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 13:21:26 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:51:26 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Sreekanth S Rameshaiah wrote: > > On 26 September 2013 16:32, sankarshan wrote: > >> > If i/others was/were not part of past event are you doing enough to let >> us >> > in so we can be there for next event? >> >> I think this is a dangerous assumption to make. I do not see Noufal >> or, the PSSI gating/preventing anyone to stand up and be counted. If >> you have specific instances where you feel that your contributions >> have been actively prevented by the organization or, individuals, I >> would suggest seeking redress within the PSSI. That would require to >> be addressed. > > > Its a community event. No one else has to "do anything to let you in". > Please watch threads that discuss the organising of the conference, come > and pick up task that works for you and help the community run the event. > - sree > I doubt everyone in team thinks same way otherwise this would not have come this far. > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kiran.daredevil at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 13:26:33 2013 From: kiran.daredevil at gmail.com (Kiran Gangadharan) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:56:33 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Hi, Right, I agree. You'd never know who voted for what. And yes, we want opinions from people who matter. So I guess, debating it here is the best option. Thanks for pointing it out. Cheers, Kiran On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > Kiran Gangadharan writes: > > > [...] > > > why not create a simple poll using google forms or something, and see > > what majority of the people think instead of polluting the mailing > > lists with all sorts of arguments ? > > Because democracy, as has been repeatedly proved, is not the best way to > make imporant functional decisions. We "argue" constructively and then > come to a (semi) consensus. It isn't pollution, it's the purpose of the > list. > > I don't want the opinion of someone who doesn't care about the > conference to influence how we run it. Do you? > > [...] > > > -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > -- Kiran Gangadharan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Thu Sep 26 13:44:15 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:14:15 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (atul jha's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:51:26 +0530") References: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <8738orerjk.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> atul jha writes: [...] > I doubt everyone in team thinks same way otherwise this would not have > come this far. [...] This is getting pointlessly tiresome. Most of the people *do* think this way and that's why PyCon India has been conducted for 5 years now and has grown into a big event. People pitch in when there's a call for volunteers and help out. If you're accusing me or someone else on the list about something, come clean and say exactly what the problem is. If you think I and a few others run a secret cabal here that pulls strings and runs PyCon India while blackballing the general community, say so. If you're dissatisfied with the way something is being organised, or see some kind of scope for improvement, specify exactly what and pitch in at any time. Knowing how short handed we always are, no one here refuses help. If you expect everyone to accept your (rather naive) recommendations without questioning them, I'm sorry, that's not going to happen. People who've been on this list for a while know who are doing all the work and whose suggestions are backed by action. The bottom line is if you have something constructive to say, do so. If you have time to pitch in, do so. If you want to criticise something about the conference or PSSI work, do so. If, on the other hand, all you're interested in is hurling accusations at people and making a ruckus, just don't. -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Thu Sep 26 13:47:05 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:17:05 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (Kiran Gangadharan's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:56:33 +0530") References: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <87vc1ndcue.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Kiran Gangadharan writes: > Hi, > > Right, I agree. You'd never know who voted for what. And yes, we want > opinions from people who matter. So I guess, debating it here is the best > option. Thanks for pointing it out. You're welcome. :) We tried the "vote for everything" approach back in 2009 and it failed miserably. I mentioned this when I presented my "Road to PyCon India" during the maiden conference. The slides are at http://nibrahim.net.in/journal/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/road-to-pycon.pdf [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From anandpillai at letterboxes.org Thu Sep 26 13:49:42 2013 From: anandpillai at letterboxes.org (Anand B Pillai) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:19:42 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <52441F56.3080201@letterboxes.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 26 September 2013 04:39 PM, atul jha wrote: > Sankarshan, > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:32 PM, sankarshan > wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:23 PM, atul jha >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Noufal Ibrahim >>> wrote: >> >>>> Because democracy, as has been repeatedly proved, is not the >>>> best way to make imporant functional decisions. We "argue" >>>> constructively and then come to a (semi) consensus. It isn't >>>> pollution, it's the purpose of the list. >>>> >>> Hmm. So you suggesting closed door discussion and then >>> throwing it out >> loud >>> & claiming it community wants it? >> >> No. I don't think he did mention that. And, your statement is an >> interpretation of what he wrote. I would like to default to >> believe that the event organization which constitutes members >> from PSSI (and, some how are members of PSF) have the best >> interests of the Python community in India in their hearts. I >> sense this thread calling that into question. I do not believe >> that is healthy. >> >> To be able to make changes one needs to participate. Atul, >> perhaps you need to explore how you can participate in the PyCon >> India process for the 2014 edition and, thereafter drive the >> changes you like to see. >> >> PSSI has a fiduciary duty to the Python community in India. I do >> not seem them shirking that role. >> >>> >>>> >>>> I don't want the opinion of someone who doesn't care about >>>> the conference to influence how we run it. Do you? >>>> >>> How welcoming are you for advise from someone who wants >>> to help? >> >> Creating a poll is one step to helping. The next step is to be >> able to devise means of assessing the outcome of the poll and, >> also being able to have ownership of the changes. Ownership and >> execution requires participation. I think Noufal has earlier >> alluded to the requirement of individuals stepping up to >> participate and contribute and not just stay at the first step. >> >>> As Kiran mentioned, its good idea we should conduct a poll & >>> have >> everyones >>> voice heard, instead of sitting inside a close door and >>> deciding what and how for all. >>> >>> If i/others was/were not part of past event are you doing >>> enough to let >> us >>> in so we can be there for next event? >> >> I think this is a dangerous assumption to make. I do not see >> Noufal or, the PSSI gating/preventing anyone to stand up and be >> counted. If you have specific instances where you feel that your >> contributions have been actively prevented by the organization >> or, individuals, I would suggest seeking redress within the PSSI. >> That would require to be addressed. >> >> >> Every single reply of Naufel was as if i have done something >> really bad by > letting my voice in here. > This kind of arguments are not productive. Let us stick to your original point and not digress. Noufal or me or anyone for that matter is not running the conference as a personal show or something. It is a community conference driven by a number of people, almost all equal. However as you know democracy is not flat but it is tiered. You do need people at different levels and hierarchies to drive things forward. Otherwise things just wouldn't work and democracy would becomes a very noisy and unproductive anarchy. To further qualify my point, you wouldn't even want to consider this a democracy in the first place. A few people who took the time and effort to do things early on naturally are perceived as leaders of the community. They aren't democratically elected - but are in this position by meritocracy. So I don't fully buy the democracy argument. Meritocracy is never given on a platter - it is achieved by virtue of hard work - Give respect to it. The other pragmatic aspect is to run something like this in the way that everyone is happy - would need a lot of dedication in terms of time, space and human resources. Quite often decisions are made to take the shortest path forward - not because we are autocrats but because of lack of time or people to get things done in the most pleasing way for all - it just never happens. > All his mails have been totally unwelcoming, which is the reason > for outburst. If you are calling yourself an organizer or what not > for community you need to have guts to hear everyone & not > stereotyping. > No personal attacks please and no naming/shaming business. If you can step up and contribute to running of the conference, perhaps we would be more than willing to give a lot of time and mind space to understand your views - the point of meritocracy in the first place. So please do that and don't resort to unproductive paths such as personal criticisms. Your ideas and suggestions are welcome, your mud slinging ain't. - -- Regards, - --Anand - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Software Architect/Consultant anandpillai at letterboxes.org Please note my updated email address . Kindly update your address books. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSRB9WAAoJEMTxYeOp9eaogdYIAI7/WFc5/7i2oFYSW+qpuCgW YytykFmK4jJVw65d3gJldQP/NoJPznwkbJwda/qdfpxn6pm3LmdW3uEFSwmsbMTZ Zrwo2J6NOLqZ6TtX/CG1y9cCWMvydUDNoRtdNJWx2IxvidsaEWQ9gzyMQBZ+8yNi /0oGvJG9dwQ4nas+oer1r5kLcLVobmIJH6QHehaRfFLE6KXYal0Nz3BSDtHM4jpO K1+wwi6cBIXAX/EcixPJddIzZnCfSy/FiAe95gM/gHIYlkHomRkxkHNp2b2AVTLu zgLEtum/4RqZuZj2NU5sTda1QdS8PbGBnAYZarWUpKHpSL2FiYNYW7UTOs+X5L4= =tDPT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 13:51:17 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:21:17 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <8738orerjk.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <8738orerjk.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > atul jha writes: > > > [...] > > I doubt everyone in team thinks same way otherwise this would not have > > come this far. > [...] > > This is getting pointlessly tiresome. > > Indeed. > Most of the people *do* think this way and that's why PyCon India has > been conducted for 5 years now and has grown into a big event. People > pitch in when there's a call for volunteers and help out. > > If you're accusing me or someone else on the list about something, come > clean and say exactly what the problem is. > > Read your previous mails & you will realize. > If you think I and a few others run a secret cabal here that pulls > strings and runs PyCon India while blackballing the general community, > say so. > Its how you assumed. > > If you're dissatisfied with the way something is being organised, or see > some kind of scope for improvement, specify exactly what and pitch in at > any time. Knowing how short handed we always are, no one here refuses > help. > > Is that what i was not doing in this mail thread? > If you expect everyone to accept your (rather naive) recommendations > without questioning them, I'm sorry, that's not going to happen. People > who've been on this list for a while know who are doing all the work and > whose suggestions are backed by action. > Well does that means if someone new coming to list with some ideas he is an outsider? All your replies points same way. > > The bottom line is if you have something constructive to say, do so. If > you have time to pitch in, do so. If you want to criticise something > about the conference or PSSI work, do so. If, on the other hand, all > you're interested in is hurling accusations at people and making a > ruckus, just don't. > > Well now you are talking about PSSI. All this while it was Am happy something is changing. -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 13:53:43 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:23:43 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <52441F56.3080201@letterboxes.org> References: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <52441F56.3080201@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: Anand, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Anand B Pillai wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday 26 September 2013 04:39 PM, atul jha wrote: > > Sankarshan, > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:32 PM, sankarshan > > wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:23 PM, atul jha > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Noufal Ibrahim > >>> wrote: > >> > >>>> Because democracy, as has been repeatedly proved, is not the > >>>> best way to make imporant functional decisions. We "argue" > >>>> constructively and then come to a (semi) consensus. It isn't > >>>> pollution, it's the purpose of the list. > >>>> > >>> Hmm. So you suggesting closed door discussion and then > >>> throwing it out > >> loud > >>> & claiming it community wants it? > >> > >> No. I don't think he did mention that. And, your statement is an > >> interpretation of what he wrote. I would like to default to > >> believe that the event organization which constitutes members > >> from PSSI (and, some how are members of PSF) have the best > >> interests of the Python community in India in their hearts. I > >> sense this thread calling that into question. I do not believe > >> that is healthy. > >> > >> To be able to make changes one needs to participate. Atul, > >> perhaps you need to explore how you can participate in the PyCon > >> India process for the 2014 edition and, thereafter drive the > >> changes you like to see. > >> > >> PSSI has a fiduciary duty to the Python community in India. I do > >> not seem them shirking that role. > >> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> I don't want the opinion of someone who doesn't care about > >>>> the conference to influence how we run it. Do you? > >>>> > >>> How welcoming are you for advise from someone who wants > >>> to help? > >> > >> Creating a poll is one step to helping. The next step is to be > >> able to devise means of assessing the outcome of the poll and, > >> also being able to have ownership of the changes. Ownership and > >> execution requires participation. I think Noufal has earlier > >> alluded to the requirement of individuals stepping up to > >> participate and contribute and not just stay at the first step. > >> > >>> As Kiran mentioned, its good idea we should conduct a poll & > >>> have > >> everyones > >>> voice heard, instead of sitting inside a close door and > >>> deciding what and how for all. > >>> > >>> If i/others was/were not part of past event are you doing > >>> enough to let > >> us > >>> in so we can be there for next event? > >> > >> I think this is a dangerous assumption to make. I do not see > >> Noufal or, the PSSI gating/preventing anyone to stand up and be > >> counted. If you have specific instances where you feel that your > >> contributions have been actively prevented by the organization > >> or, individuals, I would suggest seeking redress within the PSSI. > >> That would require to be addressed. > >> > >> > >> Every single reply of Naufel was as if i have done something > >> really bad by > > letting my voice in here. > > > > This kind of arguments are not productive. Let us stick to your > original point and not digress. > > Noufal or me or anyone for that matter is not running the conference > as a personal show or something. It is a community conference driven > by a number of people, almost all equal. However as you know democracy > is not flat but it is tiered. You do need people at different levels > and hierarchies to drive things forward. Otherwise things just wouldn't > work and democracy would becomes a very noisy and unproductive > anarchy. > > To further qualify my point, you wouldn't even want to consider > this a democracy in the first place. A few people who took the time > and effort to do things early on naturally are perceived as leaders > of the community. They aren't democratically elected - but are > in this position by meritocracy. So I don't fully buy the democracy > argument. Meritocracy is never given on a platter - it is achieved > by virtue of hard work - Give respect to it. > > The other pragmatic aspect is to run something like this in the > way that everyone is happy - would need a lot of dedication in terms > of time, space and human resources. Quite often decisions are made to > take the shortest path forward - not because we are autocrats but > because of lack of time or people to get things done in the most > pleasing way for all - it just never happens. > > > All his mails have been totally unwelcoming, which is the reason > > for outburst. If you are calling yourself an organizer or what not > > for community you need to have guts to hear everyone & not > > stereotyping. > > > > > No personal attacks please and no naming/shaming business. If you > can step up and contribute to running of the conference, perhaps > we would be more than willing to give a lot of time and mind space > to understand your views - the point of meritocracy in the first place. > > So please do that and don't resort to unproductive paths such > as personal criticisms. Your ideas and suggestions are welcome, > your mud slinging ain't. > > > I had no intention in throwing muds on one another. If this team has sensible bunch of guys open to listen to everyone then better they should act like that. > - -- > Regards, > > - --Anand > > - > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Software Architect/Consultant > anandpillai at letterboxes.org > > Please note my updated email address . > Kindly update your address books. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSRB9WAAoJEMTxYeOp9eaogdYIAI7/WFc5/7i2oFYSW+qpuCgW > YytykFmK4jJVw65d3gJldQP/NoJPznwkbJwda/qdfpxn6pm3LmdW3uEFSwmsbMTZ > Zrwo2J6NOLqZ6TtX/CG1y9cCWMvydUDNoRtdNJWx2IxvidsaEWQ9gzyMQBZ+8yNi > /0oGvJG9dwQ4nas+oer1r5kLcLVobmIJH6QHehaRfFLE6KXYal0Nz3BSDtHM4jpO > K1+wwi6cBIXAX/EcixPJddIzZnCfSy/FiAe95gM/gHIYlkHomRkxkHNp2b2AVTLu > zgLEtum/4RqZuZj2NU5sTda1QdS8PbGBnAYZarWUpKHpSL2FiYNYW7UTOs+X5L4= > =tDPT > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anandpillai at letterboxes.org Thu Sep 26 14:08:30 2013 From: anandpillai at letterboxes.org (Anand B Pillai) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:38:30 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <8738orerjk.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <524423BE.1020203@letterboxes.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 26 September 2013 05:21 PM, atul jha wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Noufal Ibrahim > wrote: > >> atul jha writes: >> >> >> [...] >>> I doubt everyone in team thinks same way otherwise this would >>> not have come this far. >> [...] >> >> This is getting pointlessly tiresome. >> >> Indeed. > > >> Most of the people *do* think this way and that's why PyCon India >> has been conducted for 5 years now and has grown into a big >> event. People pitch in when there's a call for volunteers and >> help out. >> >> If you're accusing me or someone else on the list about >> something, come clean and say exactly what the problem is. >> >> Read your previous mails & you will realize. > >> If you think I and a few others run a secret cabal here that >> pulls strings and runs PyCon India while blackballing the general >> community, say so. >> > Its how you assumed. > >> >> If you're dissatisfied with the way something is being organised, >> or see some kind of scope for improvement, specify exactly what >> and pitch in at any time. Knowing how short handed we always are, >> no one here refuses help. >> >> Is that what i was not doing in this mail thread? > >> If you expect everyone to accept your (rather naive) >> recommendations without questioning them, I'm sorry, that's not >> going to happen. People who've been on this list for a while know >> who are doing all the work and whose suggestions are backed by >> action. >> > Well does that means if someone new coming to list with some ideas > he is an outsider? All your replies points same way. Let me put it this way. E-mails are not the best medium for keeping up a continuous conversation. Mailing lists are especially notorious for fragmenting a line of discussion - because you tend to loose your original line of thought as threads come in from the side etc. Anway I am digressing. The thing is, let us face it - People are reluctant to change. So perhaps a good way to try and change the thinking or introduce new ideas is a "gentle nudge" rather than a "forceful entry". I hope I am making sense. The most ideal way to build a productive conversation would be to start presenting your idea using the approach of least resistance. (Suffer me a bit more.) If you look back to your first post, you started off by " Who & why was it decided to charge fees for volunteers and speakers? Is it because sponsorship money not sufficient? Is there any blog/mail provides description/info about the overall expenditure of the event? " Not very diplomatic I think. > >> >> The bottom line is if you have something constructive to say, do >> so. If you have time to pitch in, do so. If you want to criticise >> something about the conference or PSSI work, do so. If, on the >> other hand, all you're interested in is hurling accusations at >> people and making a ruckus, just don't. >> >> Well now you are talking about PSSI. All this while it was > Am happy something is changing. Sure, maybe you are. We do need inputs, ideas and suggestions but for the general good environment of the mailing list and to make sure your ideas are recieved positively, may I suggest "gentle nudges" and "incremental suggestions" than "in-your-face-questions" ? Hope I was helpful. > > -- >> Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Inpycon mailing > list Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > - -- Regards, - --Anand - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Software Architect/Consultant anandpillai at letterboxes.org Please note my updated email address . Kindly update your address books. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSRCO+AAoJEMTxYeOp9eaokaoIAJgl+r8vSqH12U6dX2IpngE+ siseRzQ7AzOKOTFxCA3ZX/n+dwgq3wzFLNE4R8qNxVmOr3gOGjU3LpqSJcy88wsR LnzudkUIC8tpsR07oMZA/FTspy8bQCjCVvKBcIBHUwttYUyJBLfUjf2PRSbeao8M K5rphuBhNUBQuSFs6RWD+x0LZ8JoYBqnAr/F6fR/vPtY3PmWufEgKAhX745Lk5OO 6rMaYgxT3v6BX/mqXvzkvd6Vc7YmAEUrCz79+iuF5ZDYY6tWBrG9hS4dU2e/GMPl 69V0CCf3S/Hgz8aG83CDckrVm7Pth7J75JRIy930uT7arLrD6gPQ/JeMzAcfl90= =/Auq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 14:28:28 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:58:28 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <524423BE.1020203@letterboxes.org> References: <87li2jev9y.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <8738orerjk.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <524423BE.1020203@letterboxes.org> Message-ID: Anand, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Anand B Pillai wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday 26 September 2013 05:21 PM, atul jha wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Noufal Ibrahim > > wrote: > > > >> atul jha writes: > >> > >> > >> [...] > >>> I doubt everyone in team thinks same way otherwise this would > >>> not have come this far. > >> [...] > >> > >> This is getting pointlessly tiresome. > >> > >> Indeed. > > > > > >> Most of the people *do* think this way and that's why PyCon India > >> has been conducted for 5 years now and has grown into a big > >> event. People pitch in when there's a call for volunteers and > >> help out. > >> > >> If you're accusing me or someone else on the list about > >> something, come clean and say exactly what the problem is. > >> > >> Read your previous mails & you will realize. > > > >> If you think I and a few others run a secret cabal here that > >> pulls strings and runs PyCon India while blackballing the general > >> community, say so. > >> > > Its how you assumed. > > > >> > >> If you're dissatisfied with the way something is being organised, > >> or see some kind of scope for improvement, specify exactly what > >> and pitch in at any time. Knowing how short handed we always are, > >> no one here refuses help. > >> > >> Is that what i was not doing in this mail thread? > > > >> If you expect everyone to accept your (rather naive) > >> recommendations without questioning them, I'm sorry, that's not > >> going to happen. People who've been on this list for a while know > >> who are doing all the work and whose suggestions are backed by > >> action. > >> > > Well does that means if someone new coming to list with some ideas > > he is an outsider? All your replies points same way. > > Let me put it this way. E-mails are not the best medium for keeping up > a continuous conversation. Mailing lists are especially notorious for > fragmenting a line of discussion - because you tend to loose your > original line of thought as threads come in from the side etc. > > Anway I am digressing. > > The thing is, let us face it - People are reluctant to change. So > perhaps a good way to try and change the thinking or introduce new > ideas is a "gentle nudge" rather than a "forceful entry". > I hope I am making sense. > > The most ideal way to build a productive conversation would be > to start presenting your idea using the approach of least resistance. > > (Suffer me a bit more.) > > If you look back to your first post, you started off by > > " > Who & why was it decided to charge fees for volunteers and speakers? > > Is it because sponsorship money not sufficient? Is there any blog/mail > provides description/info about the overall expenditure of the event? > " > > Not very diplomatic I think. > > Am not sure if it requires to be diplomatic if its about a community where everyone is welcome to ask/participate in loud/open. > > > >> > >> The bottom line is if you have something constructive to say, do > >> so. If you have time to pitch in, do so. If you want to criticise > >> something about the conference or PSSI work, do so. If, on the > >> other hand, all you're interested in is hurling accusations at > >> people and making a ruckus, just don't. > >> > >> Well now you are talking about PSSI. All this while it was > > Am happy something is changing. > > Sure, maybe you are. We do need inputs, ideas and suggestions but > for the general good environment of the mailing list and to make sure > your ideas are recieved positively, may I suggest "gentle nudges" > and "incremental suggestions" than "in-your-face-questions" ? > > I am not sure but this works well most of the time if you are in a community with OPEN participation. > > Hope I was helpful. > Thanks for letting me know how i should start my conversation in order to be heard by the folks from this community & PCCI/Pycon organizers in general. I am happy Kiran/You/Sankarshan addressed some of it. I would hope all this conversation leads to some final conclusion. > > > -- > >> Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Inpycon mailing > > list Inpycon at python.org > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > > > > > - -- > Regards, > > - --Anand > > - > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Software Architect/Consultant > anandpillai at letterboxes.org > > Please note my updated email address . > Kindly update your address books. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSRCO+AAoJEMTxYeOp9eaokaoIAJgl+r8vSqH12U6dX2IpngE+ > siseRzQ7AzOKOTFxCA3ZX/n+dwgq3wzFLNE4R8qNxVmOr3gOGjU3LpqSJcy88wsR > LnzudkUIC8tpsR07oMZA/FTspy8bQCjCVvKBcIBHUwttYUyJBLfUjf2PRSbeao8M > K5rphuBhNUBQuSFs6RWD+x0LZ8JoYBqnAr/F6fR/vPtY3PmWufEgKAhX745Lk5OO > 6rMaYgxT3v6BX/mqXvzkvd6Vc7YmAEUrCz79+iuF5ZDYY6tWBrG9hS4dU2e/GMPl > 69V0CCf3S/Hgz8aG83CDckrVm7Pth7J75JRIy930uT7arLrD6gPQ/JeMzAcfl90= > =/Auq > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vpuri.social at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 15:09:00 2013 From: vpuri.social at gmail.com (Vivek Puri) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:39:00 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <524431EC.2090500@gmail.com> Hi, I do agree with what kiran said. One option as earlier suggested is to offer same price as early bird to speakers and volunteers, seems middle of road but good. Everybody pays but speakers and volunteer do get special treatment. rgds vivek From anandology at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 16:02:08 2013 From: anandology at gmail.com (Anand Chitipothu) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:32:08 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:32 AM, atul jha wrote: > Hi, > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > >> Kiran Jonnalagadda writes: >> >> >> [...] >> >> > HasGeek policy is free tickets for speakers and crew. >> >> I wasn't aware of that. >> >> > I bought a ticket because I knew it was PyCon policy -- I bought a >> > ticket even last year despite volunteering. >> >> > >> There's still gap in the communication. Anand told me about one or two >> speakers who were annoyed that they had to pay even though their talks >> were selected. >> > > >> >> >> [...] >> >> >> -- >> Cordially, >> Noufal >> http://nibrahim.net.in >> _______________________________________________ >> Inpycon mailing list >> Inpycon at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon >> > > > Who & why was it decided to charge fees for volunteers and speakers? > There was a discussion in this mailing list when we decided the fee and the tiers. Where were you then? > Is it because sponsorship money not sufficient? Is there any blog/mail > provides description/info about the overall expenditure of the event? > > If money is real issue please get a new sponsorship model in place which > handles entry fee payments for speakers and volunteers specifically. > I don't see the point. No volunteer has complained that he has a problem with paying the fee. Some student volunteers have explicitly asked us and we've made couple of exceptions. Again, the problem with the speakers was not about paying the money, but the lack of the communication about that. Some speakers were surprised at the last minute because they weren't aware that they have to pay the fee. I think we should respect the opinions of the people who have managed the volunteers and handled the speakers than suggesting hypothetical issues without any base. It is not very good use of the time on this mailing list. > When most of the volunteers are students & some speakers as well. Some of > them are coming from other part of country & planning stay/food on their > own. Can we not do best by giving them entry to the event? > How do you know that most of the volunteers are students? I've worked very closely with volunteers this year and I haven't heard any complaints from them. There are even some volunteers who have just sit in the network room all the three days of the conference, making sure the network/registration desk working fine, and some of them were students. When they were very happy to pay the fee themselves, I don't see an point of discussing about it. Comparing an Indian event with event in US & following with same footprint > does not go well here. > > An event with focus on Indian crowd should be handled in Indian way. > Well, I've started this thread not with the intention of blindly following that model, but because that post has explained a model that *we have been* following since beginning and I strongly believe that it very good model to continue. It would have been a lot more productive if you had come in couple of months earlier and helped in shaping the event. Lot of these decisions have come out of the collective wisdom of running PyCon India over years and closely observing it grow. I'm sure you'll have a better understanding about the whole thing once you see it closely. Hope to see you at PyCon India 2014. Anand -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From hiddenharmony at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 16:09:05 2013 From: hiddenharmony at gmail.com (Vivek Khurana) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:39:05 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <524431EC.2090500@gmail.com> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <524431EC.2090500@gmail.com> Message-ID: Charging Volunteers is not acceptable. Volunteers put in physical and mental effort to run the conference, so charging volunteers will discourage people from volunteering. If volunteers are being charged then either the money should be refunded at the end of the event or Volunteers should be paid for the effort they put in to run the event. regards Vivek On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Vivek Puri wrote: > Hi, > > I do agree with what kiran said. > > One option as earlier suggested is to offer same price as early bird to > speakers and > volunteers, seems middle of road but good. Everybody pays but speakers and > volunteer > do get special treatment. > > rgds > vivek > > ______________________________**_________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/inpycon > -- The hidden harmony is better than the obvious!! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 16:10:39 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:40:39 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:32 AM, atul jha wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote: >> >>> Kiran Jonnalagadda writes: >>> >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> > HasGeek policy is free tickets for speakers and crew. >>> >>> I wasn't aware of that. >>> >>> > I bought a ticket because I knew it was PyCon policy -- I bought a >>> > ticket even last year despite volunteering. >>> >>> >> >>> There's still gap in the communication. Anand told me about one or two >>> speakers who were annoyed that they had to pay even though their talks >>> were selected. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cordially, >>> Noufal >>> http://nibrahim.net.in >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Inpycon mailing list >>> Inpycon at python.org >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon >>> >> >> >> Who & why was it decided to charge fees for volunteers and speakers? >> > > There was a discussion in this mailing list when we decided the fee and > the tiers. Where were you then? > Well do you want to start it all again? > > >> Is it because sponsorship money not sufficient? Is there any blog/mail >> provides description/info about the overall expenditure of the event? >> >> If money is real issue please get a new sponsorship model in place which >> handles entry fee payments for speakers and volunteers specifically. >> > > I don't see the point. No volunteer has complained that he has a problem > with paying the fee. Some student volunteers have explicitly asked us and > we've made couple of exceptions. > > Well why can`t you make it loud and clear so more of such gets along. > Again, the problem with the speakers was not about paying the money, but > the lack of the communication about that. Some speakers were surprised at > the last minute because they weren't aware that they have to pay the fee. > > I was one of them too. > I think we should respect the opinions of the people who have managed the > volunteers and handled the speakers than suggesting hypothetical issues > without any base. It is not very good use of the time on this mailing list. > > Well its all your prospective of seeing things. I can`t help it. > When most of the volunteers are students & some speakers as well. Some >> of them are coming from other part of country & planning stay/food on their >> own. Can we not do best by giving them entry to the event? >> > > How do you know that most of the volunteers are students? I've worked very > closely with volunteers this year and I haven't heard any complaints from > them. There are even some volunteers who have just sit in the network room > all the three days of the conference, making sure the network/registration > desk working fine, and some of them were students. When they were very > happy to pay the fee themselves, I don't see an point of discussing about > it. > > Well am waiting for Kiran`s blog as he mentioned before mentioning everything about the event from expenditure to participation. Comparing an Indian event with event in US & following with same >> footprint does not go well here. >> >> An event with focus on Indian crowd should be handled in Indian way. >> > > Well, I've started this thread not with the intention of blindly following > that model, but because that post has explained a model that *we have been* > following since beginning and I strongly believe that it very good model to > continue. > > It would have been a lot more productive if you had come in couple of > months earlier and helped in shaping the event. Lot of these decisions have > come out of the collective wisdom of running PyCon India over years and > closely observing it grow. I'm sure you'll have a better understanding > about the whole thing once you see it closely. Hope to see you at PyCon > India 2014. > > Well waiting for it before 2014 event not going to help. Today its me that time some else come with same. Why can`t we fix it now? > Anand > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > > -- Atul www.atuljha.com irc(freenode) : koolhead17 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From me at bibhas.in Thu Sep 26 16:19:27 2013 From: me at bibhas.in (Bibhas) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:49:27 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <524431EC.2090500@gmail.com> Message-ID: <6b7d6819-c07e-4b8f-9aef-332917b0566d@email.android.com> Because we volunteers pay for the tickets, we're even more dedicated towards helping the event. Like I mentioned before, Revoking the ticket charge for volunteers would just welcome more freeloaders. We do receive the appreciation of the community. This year the twitter timeline was flooded thanking the volunteers. Paying or not paying doesn't matter in front of that. Please read Kiran Jonnalagadda's mail. Vivek Khurana wrote: >Charging Volunteers is not acceptable. Volunteers put in physical and >mental effort to run the conference, so charging volunteers will >discourage >people from volunteering. If volunteers are being charged then either >the >money should be refunded at the end of the event or Volunteers should >be >paid for the effort they put in to run the event. > >regards >Vivek > > >On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Vivek Puri >wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I do agree with what kiran said. >> >> One option as earlier suggested is to offer same price as early bird >to >> speakers and >> volunteers, seems middle of road but good. Everybody pays but >speakers and >> volunteer >> do get special treatment. >> >> rgds >> vivek >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Inpycon mailing list >> Inpycon at python.org >> >https://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/inpycon >> > > > >-- >The hidden harmony is better than the obvious!! > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Inpycon mailing list >Inpycon at python.org >https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon -- Thanks Bibhas http://bibhas.in Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anandology at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 16:20:14 2013 From: anandology at gmail.com (Anand Chitipothu) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:50:14 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <524431EC.2090500@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Vivek Khurana wrote: > Charging Volunteers is not acceptable. Volunteers put in physical and > mental effort to run the conference, so charging volunteers will discourage > people from volunteering. If volunteers are being charged then either the > money should be refunded at the end of the event or Volunteers should be > paid for the effort they put in to run the event. > I disagree. Creating privileges for some people is not good for a community event. Even the lead-organizer of the event is paying, so volunteers will be happy to pay and I've seen it working. I think most important thing for volunteers is to make sure they are not too stressed out. Couple of things that we tried this time to improve that are booking cabs when people stay back in the night, order food to make sure people have something to eat when they are doing the hard work etc. Anand -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anandology at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 16:25:51 2013 From: anandology at gmail.com (Anand Chitipothu) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:55:51 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] PyCon India 2013 - Videos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Vinayak Hegde wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > >> >> >> Thanks Anand (and other volunteers). Can these be put up on pyvideos. >>> You can submit a conference here - http://pyvideo.org/suggestions/videos >>> >>> A lot more people will have access to that and the complete list can be >>> imported as RSS using that. >>> >> >> That was my plan too. But I don't think I'll be able to able to work on >> it now. Already spent 3 days on processing videos. Can someone please take >> care of this? >> > > I can help with this. Can someone notify me when all the videos have been > uploaded and added to a playlist. I will add the submission to the pyvideos > site. > Hi Vinayak, All the videos have been uploaded. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6GW05BfqWIdsaaV35jcHWPWTI-DAw6Yn Can you please take care of adding these to pyvideo.org? Anand -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vinayakh at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 16:37:56 2013 From: vinayakh at gmail.com (Vinayak Hegde) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:07:56 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] PyCon India 2013 - Videos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Anand. I have submitted it to Pyvideos for consideration with all the information required. I will follow through and post back to the list when it is up. Regards Vinayak On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Vinayak Hegde wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Thanks Anand (and other volunteers). Can these be put up on pyvideos. >>>> You can submit a conference here - >>>> http://pyvideo.org/suggestions/videos >>>> >>>> A lot more people will have access to that and the complete list can be >>>> imported as RSS using that. >>>> >>> >>> That was my plan too. But I don't think I'll be able to able to work on >>> it now. Already spent 3 days on processing videos. Can someone please take >>> care of this? >>> >> >> I can help with this. Can someone notify me when all the videos have been >> uploaded and added to a playlist. I will add the submission to the pyvideos >> site. >> > > Hi Vinayak, > > All the videos have been uploaded. > > https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6GW05BfqWIdsaaV35jcHWPWTI-DAw6Yn > > Can you please take care of adding these to pyvideo.org? > > Anand > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Thu Sep 26 17:57:43 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 21:27:43 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (Anand Chitipothu's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:32:08 +0530") References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> This thread is going nowhere. I think it's best we postpone this decision till active work starts on the next years event. We'll have to revisit this then and by that time, finances and other expenses will be more concrete. -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From vnbang2003 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 19:08:36 2013 From: vnbang2003 at gmail.com (vijay kumar) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 22:38:36 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: > This thread is going nowhere. > > +1 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 20:06:23 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:36:23 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On 26 Sep 2013 22:02, "Noufal Ibrahim" wrote: > > > This thread is going nowhere. > > I think it's best we postpone this decision till active work starts on > the next years event. We'll have to revisit this then and by that time, > finances and other expenses will be more concrete. > So in the end the whole thread went nowhere. Reason we are close bunch of folks deciding things in OUR way rest can bw mute spectators. > > > > > -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 20:10:47 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:40:47 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Also waiting for blog/mail from Kiran about overall event expenditure to understand if money is one reason for everyone pays. I would expect the organisers to be open enough in this regard. Looking forward to pyconindia 2014 announcement Cheers.. On 26 Sep 2013 23:36, "atul jha" wrote: > > > On 26 Sep 2013 22:02, "Noufal Ibrahim" wrote: > > > > > > This thread is going nowhere. > > > > I think it's best we postpone this decision till active work starts on > > the next years event. We'll have to revisit this then and by that time, > > finances and other expenses will be more concrete. > > > So in the end the whole thread went nowhere. > > Reason we are close bunch of folks deciding things in OUR way rest can bw mute spectators. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cordially, > > Noufal > > http://nibrahim.net.in > > _______________________________________________ > > Inpycon mailing list > > Inpycon at python.org > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jace at pobox.com Thu Sep 26 20:17:40 2013 From: jace at pobox.com (Kiran Jonnalagadda) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:47:40 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Thursday, 26 September 2013 at 11:40 PM, atul jha wrote: > Also waiting for blog/mail from Kiran about overall event expenditure to understand if money is one reason for everyone pays. I would expect the organisers to be open enough in this regard. > Looking forward to pyconindia 2014 announcement > > Not sure why you are expecting that from me. I'm not part of the PyCon organising team apart from hanging out on this mailing list, nor am I aware of PSSI's accounts. I have written about HasGeek's event pricing on the HasGeek blog, but HasGeek is not affiliated with PyCon apart from loaning equipment and training on video. FWIW, here's my post on the HasGeek blog: https://blog.hasgeek.com/2013/why-prices-go-up-closer-to-an-event Kiran -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koolhead17 at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 20:20:59 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:50:59 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Jace, On 26 Sep 2013 23:47, "Kiran Jonnalagadda" wrote: > > On Thursday, 26 September 2013 at 11:40 PM, atul jha wrote: >> >> Also waiting for blog/mail from Kiran about overall event expenditure to understand if money is one reason for everyone pays. I would expect the organisers to be open enough in this regard. >> >> Looking forward to pyconindia 2014 announcement > > > Not sure why you are expecting that from me. I'm not part of the PyCon organising team apart from hanging out on this mailing list, nor am I aware of PSSI's accounts. It was for other kiran. :) > > I have written about HasGeek's event pricing on the HasGeek blog, but HasGeek is not affiliated with PyCon apart from loaning equipment and training on video. FWIW, here's my post on the HasGeek blog: https://blog.hasgeek.com/2013/why-prices-go-up-closer-to-an-event > We known about it. Cheers, > Kiran > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From email at miteshashar.com Thu Sep 26 20:58:32 2013 From: email at miteshashar.com (Mitesh Ashar) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:28:32 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: > So in the end the whole thread went nowhere. > > Reason we are close bunch of folks deciding things in OUR way rest can bw mute spectators. Ok. All people who've been responsible for running and having brought the conference to what it is today, have answered meticulously your questions and responded to your constant kiddish reactions multiple times. To me it seems, you're hell bent on garnering a response you like to the outright and abruptly asked question, which you very confidently asked with an i-know-it-all attitude. After multiple attempts of answering you(which imho were pretty intentful and openly provided), if this is what you've got to say, I really feel it is you who's being close minded. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From modi.konark at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 23:01:05 2013 From: modi.konark at gmail.com (konark modi) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 02:31:05 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: +1 Thread going nowhere. This PyCon was a tremendous experience for me, not only as a speaker but as a volunteer too. My +1 for everyone pays. Given the conference fee, and all the fuss about who pays and how. Instead of doing postmortem and dissection of processes/policies which are easy enough to convey/measure/follow we have some very basic areas and with larger scope of improvement, as a community those should be at the prime focus . Regards Konark Modi On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Mitesh Ashar wrote: > > So in the end the whole thread went nowhere. > > > > Reason we are close bunch of folks deciding things in OUR way rest can > bw mute spectators. > > Ok. All people who've been responsible for running and having brought the > conference to what it is today, have answered meticulously your questions > and responded to your constant kiddish reactions multiple times. > > To me it seems, you're hell bent on garnering a response you like to the > outright and abruptly asked question, which you very confidently asked with > an i-know-it-all attitude. > > After multiple attempts of answering you(which imho were pretty intentful > and openly provided), if this is what you've got to say, I really feel it > is you who's being close minded. > > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Fri Sep 27 06:07:21 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:37:21 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] First steps for 2014 (was: Everybody Pays Policy) In-Reply-To: (konark modi's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2013 02:31:05 +0530") References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <87ob7ec3gm.fsf_-_@sanitarium.localdomain> I think the first thing to do is to get the branding right. Before December is a good time. Then all the materials (brochure, website, swag etc.) can all look the same and it gives a unified look to the entire thing. I can't think of anyting else that should be done before this is settled. It's the public face of the event. -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Fri Sep 27 06:09:52 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:39:52 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (atul jha's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:36:23 +0530") References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <87fvsqc3cf.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> atul jha writes: [...] > So in the end the whole thread went nowhere. > > Reason we are close bunch of folks deciding things in OUR way rest can > bw mute spectators. Yes. If that's what it takes to keep the peanut gallery quiet. [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From koolhead17 at gmail.com Fri Sep 27 06:18:05 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:48:05 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87fvsqc3cf.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvsqc3cf.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On 27 Sep 2013 09:41, "Noufal Ibrahim" wrote: > > atul jha writes: > > > [...] > > > So in the end the whole thread went nowhere. > > > > Reason we are close bunch of folks deciding things in OUR way rest can > > bw mute spectators. > > Yes. If that's what it takes to keep the peanut gallery quiet. You won't give up will you? :) > > [...] > > > -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Fri Sep 27 06:45:04 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:15:04 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: (atul jha's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:48:05 +0530") References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvsqc3cf.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <87a9iyc1pr.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> atul jha writes: [...] >> Yes. If that's what it takes to keep the peanut gallery quiet. > > You won't give up will you? :) Nope. If I did, the conference would not have taken place at all. [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From koolhead17 at gmail.com Fri Sep 27 06:59:09 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:29:09 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: <87a9iyc1pr.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvsqc3cf.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9iyc1pr.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On 27 Sep 2013 10:16, "Noufal Ibrahim" wrote: > > atul jha writes: > > > [...] > > > >> Yes. If that's what it takes to keep the peanut gallery quiet. > > > > You won't give up will you? :) > > Nope. If I did, the conference would not have taken place at all. Hmm. Good to know but that you did something incredible all youself. You will get community peanut masala from me when we meet. :) Having said all this, my questions still remains unanswered. Although am hopeful in coming months it will get answered. Am not giving up so easily. :) > > [...] > > > -- > Cordially, > Noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From baiju.m.mail at gmail.com Fri Sep 27 07:35:13 2013 From: baiju.m.mail at gmail.com (Baiju M) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:05:13 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvsqc3cf.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9iyc1pr.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:29 AM, atul jha wrote: > > On 27 Sep 2013 10:16, "Noufal Ibrahim" wrote: >> >> atul jha writes: >> >> [...] >> >> >> >> Yes. If that's what it takes to keep the peanut gallery quiet. >> > >> > You won't give up will you? :) >> >> Nope. If I did, the conference would not have taken place at all. > > Hmm. > Good to know but that you did something incredible all youself. Noufal has received an international award from PSF for organizing the first PyCON India: http://pyfound.blogspot.in/2009/10/third-quarter-community-service-awards.html -- Baiju M From koolhead17 at gmail.com Fri Sep 27 07:46:01 2013 From: koolhead17 at gmail.com (atul jha) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:16:01 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvsqc3cf.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9iyc1pr.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Baiju, On 27 Sep 2013 11:05, "Baiju M" wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:29 AM, atul jha wrote: > > > > On 27 Sep 2013 10:16, "Noufal Ibrahim" wrote: > >> > >> atul jha writes: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> > >> >> Yes. If that's what it takes to keep the peanut gallery quiet. > >> > > >> > You won't give up will you? :) > >> > >> Nope. If I did, the conference would not have taken place at all. > > > > Hmm. > > Good to know but that you did something incredible all youself. > > Noufal has received an international award from PSF for organizing the > first PyCON India: > http://pyfound.blogspot.in/2009/10/third-quarter-community-service-awards.html I know him for long time and all his contribution. Am not a new born kid here who needs reference for his credibility. :) Looking forward to planning on pyconindia next year. > > -- > Baiju M > _______________________________________________ > Inpycon mailing list > Inpycon at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From me at bibhas.in Fri Sep 27 08:23:41 2013 From: me at bibhas.in (Bibhas) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:53:41 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] First steps for 2014 (was: Everybody Pays Policy) In-Reply-To: <87ob7ec3gm.fsf_-_@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ob7ec3gm.fsf_-_@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: <95c0ae56-2530-4366-9144-37ea59d2fbe9@email.android.com> We had a discussion about opening CFP early this year. Anything about that? Noufal Ibrahim wrote: > >I think the first thing to do is to get the branding right. Before >December is a good time. Then all the materials (brochure, website, >swag >etc.) can all look the same and it gives a unified look to the entire >thing. > >I can't think of anyting else that should be done before this is >settled. It's the public face of the event. -- Thanks Bibhas http://bibhas.in Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Fri Sep 27 08:26:02 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:56:02 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] First steps for 2014 In-Reply-To: <95c0ae56-2530-4366-9144-37ea59d2fbe9@email.android.com> (Bibhas's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:53:41 +0530") References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ob7ec3gm.fsf_-_@sanitarium.localdomain> <95c0ae56-2530-4366-9144-37ea59d2fbe9@email.android.com> Message-ID: <87wqm2aih1.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Bibhas writes: > We had a discussion about opening CFP early this year. Anything about > that? Don't know. 5 or 6 months should be enough for that no? That's March or April. We'd need the website before that though. [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From me at bibhas.in Fri Sep 27 08:21:27 2013 From: me at bibhas.in (Bibhas) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:51:27 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvsqc3cf.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87a9iyc1pr.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: atul jha wrote: >On 27 Sep 2013 10:16, "Noufal Ibrahim" wrote: >> >> atul jha writes: >> >> >> [...] >> >> >> >> Yes. If that's what it takes to keep the peanut gallery quiet. >> > >> > You won't give up will you? :) >> >> Nope. If I did, the conference would not have taken place at all. > >Hmm. >Good to know but that you did something incredible all youself. > >You will get community peanut masala from me when we meet. :) > >Having said all this, my questions still remains unanswered. Sorry I lost the context again. What was your questions? Just for the future reference, can you please note all your questions at one place and post? Was it why everybody pays? I think the very first post of this thread by AnandC and Kiran J's reply to your original question, that you never replied to, answers it all. Or was it something else? > >Although am hopeful in coming months it will get answered. Am not >giving up >so easily. :) > > > > > >> >> [...] >> >> >> -- >> Cordially, >> Noufal >> http://nibrahim.net.in > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Inpycon mailing list >Inpycon at python.org >https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon -- Thanks Bibhas http://bibhas.in Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. From me at bibhas.in Fri Sep 27 11:31:25 2013 From: me at bibhas.in (Bibhas) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:01:25 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] First steps for 2014 In-Reply-To: <87wqm2aih1.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ioxnd18o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87ob7ec3gm.fsf_-_@sanitarium.localdomain> <95c0ae56-2530-4366-9144-37ea59d2fbe9@email.android.com> <87wqm2aih1.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Also, I think we have a better idea about the event now to put some effort to the pycon india handbook. https://github.com/pythonindia/pyconindia-handbook Noufal Ibrahim wrote: >Bibhas writes: > >> We had a discussion about opening CFP early this year. Anything about >> that? > >Don't know. 5 or 6 months should be enough for that no? That's March or >April. > >We'd need the website before that though. > >[...] -- Thanks Bibhas http://bibhas.in Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. From benignbala at gmail.com Fri Sep 27 15:30:29 2013 From: benignbala at gmail.com (Balachandran Sivakumar) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:00:29 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: Hi, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:32 AM, atul jha wrote: > > Who & why was it decided to charge fees for volunteers and speakers? > A "volunteer" is defined as "A person who freely offers to take part in an enterprise or undertake a task." So, the point that volunteer should not be charged or should be refunded is incorrect. > When most of the volunteers are students & some speakers as well. Some of > them are coming from other part of country & planning stay/food on their > own. Can we not do best by giving them entry to the event? > People come here and do all that stuff that you have said, *only* because they love python. From my interaction with some of the speakers - They were delighted to give a talk and had no problems about paying to attend the conference. The conference doesn't comprise of "just" their talk. Expecting a free entry just because some one is a speaker seems strange to me. Thanks -- Thank you Balachandran Sivakumar Arise Awake and stop not till the goal is reached. - Swami Vivekananda Mail: benignbala at gmail.com Blog: http://benignbala.wordpress.com/ From vivekcherian at gmail.com Fri Sep 27 21:36:39 2013 From: vivekcherian at gmail.com (Vivek Varghese Cherian) Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 01:06:39 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: <87li2ki4i5.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> <87fvssi14o.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Message-ID: > People come here and do all that stuff that you have said, > *only* because they love python. From my interaction with some of the > speakers - They were delighted to give a talk and had no problems > about paying to attend the conference. The conference doesn't comprise > of "just" their talk. Expecting a free entry just because some one is > a speaker seems strange to me. Thanks > > Pseudo community conferences (which are done to promote individuals like Atul Chitnis) like FOSS.in had that model of giving speakers privileges like a special speakers cabin where speakers could only enter and all that apart from free passes for them. I had volunteered for FOSS.in once in 2006 and I had Mr Shreyas Srinivasan one of Mr. Atul Chitin?s chelas come to me at the end of the conference and tell me that inspite of me being a volunteer they saw me wear a 'organisers badge'. I pretty knavishly pointed to my badge telling him that I was just a volunteer. Later did I realise he was telling me "Don't try in act smart in Atul Chtinis's team's personal conference" In Pycon 2013, I saw Konark Modi for example run around for multiple event organisation stuff and also gave a talk and he managed to do both with ease. Just pointing out a name as an example not trying to promote anyone. Konark can you enlighten Atul Jha if you did pay the conference fee in full ? This was my first Pycon and I thoroughly enjoyed every bit of it and this is undoubtedly the best FOSS community conference I have attended thus far my career spanning 11+ years. Btw, I was a volunteer for Pycon 2013, and I did not find any speaker/volunteer/delegate divide. I even shelled out an additional Rs 1500/- to attend one of the OpenStack workshops and even helped the speakers from ileanstack conduct the workshop better as I was already an OpenStack expert. Nobody needed to prompt me as a volunteer to help the speakers, it just came out instinctively as I found out an area where I could add value to the conference by what skills I already had. So the point I am making is how to volunteer and to what extend you need to volunteer is open to a delegate. All delegates should have equal privileges be them delegates/speakers/organisers/volunteers and every one should be charged the same fee. So congratulations to the organisers of Pycon 2013 for a work well done and also to you Mr Atul Jha for organising those wonderful OpenStack meetups all over India along with other volunteers :) . Let's not turn this into an OpenStack Meetup Model vs Pycon model war. PS: I forgot to add earlier that I also did the speaker announcement for Konark Modi also as Radha who was in charge of the hall had to leave early that day, and thanks also to Anand Pillai for dropping me back at my hotel after the last day of the conference :-) Regards, -- Vivek Varghese Cherian (????? ?????? ???????) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ideamonk at gmail.com Sun Sep 29 22:01:03 2013 From: ideamonk at gmail.com (Abhishek Mishra) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 01:31:03 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy Message-ID: On Kiran's compasions - Agile India is run by a training company, not by a community, most probably also not by any kind of external volunteers. UX-India - The 10k quote is for the last moment walk-ins and limited to 10. So that is a misquote, and a wrong comparison. While taking the same, the student discount is mere 2.5k, 1/4th the highest. UX-India, quite a number of speakers are from NY, California, and other parts of USA. UMO is mostly supported by design schools around India, so the high price of the tiickets may be to cover for those. Again, not so much of a open community, quite more like design schools' community. JSConf asia, quite an amazing venue. But as you try to find traces of community, in their about section at the very bottom, you will find two individuals. Even the communication of feedbacks is not open to all. Many speakers are from sponsoring orgs. It's very hard, or maybe wrong to compare community driven, controlled, event like PyCon India with such examplers and then decide if the prices should go north or what policy should be followed. Abhishek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From foss.mailinglists at gmail.com Mon Sep 30 06:51:57 2013 From: foss.mailinglists at gmail.com (sankarshan) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:21:57 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Suggestions for the next PyCon In-Reply-To: <20130908083053.GA28353@gmail.com> References: <20130908083053.GA28353@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > PyCon was great and congratulations to the organizers and volunteers. I want > to bring up a few things I thought we should think of doing before I forget. > > * Actually conference being on Friday and Saturday. > This is probably a bit debatable. We'd have people needing to take a day off > from work or college on Friday to attend. But the advantage is that people get > a day off to recover instead of heading back to work or college directly on > Monday. > > * Schedule printed on a sheet small enough to carry. > We had a large pouch for the ID card. If the schedule was printed small enough > to fit in there, that'd have been incredibly useful. I know this is challenging > enough with last minute changes, but just a thought. > > * Schedule stuck outside the halls and in the common areas. > I only noticed the schedule outside the main auditorium. It'd have been nice to > have it displayed near the second one as well. > > * A separate page on the website with a very lightweight schedule. > I'm thinking on the lines of a text file. Conference internet can be a little > unspectacular. It'd be nice to be able to see the schedule even on slow > internet. In the middle of the discussions over the other thread I noticed that these suggestions were not part of a discussion. Nigel, I'd like to thank you for putting them out. I do not know how the organizers would like to keep track of these, but they will make the conference experience better. With regards to the day of the conference, I noticed that another conference (Droidcon) has been discussing the same [a tweet exchange between Kiran and Aravind] -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Mon Sep 30 07:27:21 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:57:21 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Suggestions for the next PyCon In-Reply-To: (sankarshan's message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:21:57 +0530") References: <20130908083053.GA28353@gmail.com> Message-ID: <878uye98w6.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> sankarshan writes: [...] > In the middle of the discussions over the other thread I noticed that > these suggestions were not part of a discussion. Nigel, I'd like to > thank you for putting them out. I do not know how the organizers would > like to keep track of these, but they will make the conference > experience better. > > With regards to the day of the conference, I noticed that another > conference (Droidcon) has been discussing the same [a tweet exchange > between Kiran and Aravind] We had a volunteers supper yesterday in B'lore. Vijay got some additional feedback from some of the attendees and is keeping track of it. Vijay, Can you add these points (and the ones from Dhananjay's google plus post[1]) to your notes? We should review them from time to time to make sure that we don't miss out on anything. Let's make next years event even better. Footnotes: [1] https://plus.google.com/112820434312193778084/posts/AsiHcAcPVZK -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From anandology at gmail.com Mon Sep 30 07:22:21 2013 From: anandology at gmail.com (Anand Chitipothu) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:52:21 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Suggestions for the next PyCon In-Reply-To: <20130908083053.GA28353@gmail.com> References: <20130908083053.GA28353@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hi there, > > PyCon was great and congratulations to the organizers and volunteers. I > want > to bring up a few things I thought we should think of doing before I > forget. > > * Actually conference being on Friday and Saturday. > This is probably a bit debatable. We'd have people needing to take a day > off > from work or college on Friday to attend. But the advantage is that people > get > a day off to recover instead of heading back to work or college directly on > Monday. > We had workshops on Friday this year. If we move the main conference to Friday/Saturday, then the workshops have to move Thursday, which means 2 days of leave for people attending the workshops. I personally prefer having a day to recover, not sure if everyone will like it. > * Schedule printed on a sheet small enough to carry. > We had a large pouch for the ID card. If the schedule was printed small > enough > to fit in there, that'd have been incredibly useful. I know this is > challenging > enough with last minute changes, but just a thought. > That came up even this year, but we didn't have time to work on it. Possible option for next year. > * Schedule stuck outside the halls and in the common areas. > I only noticed the schedule outside the main auditorium. It'd have been > nice to > have it displayed near the second one as well. > We realized that too. We expected the designer to make 2 different schedules one for each room, but he made one big one and we didn't have enough time to iterate over it. * A separate page on the website with a very lightweight schedule. > I'm thinking on the lines of a text file. Conference internet can be a > little > unspectacular. It'd be nice to be able to see the schedule even on slow > internet. > Good idea. /schedule - html schedule /schedule.txt - plaintext schedule Anand -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noufal at nibrahim.net.in Mon Sep 30 07:32:37 2013 From: noufal at nibrahim.net.in (Noufal Ibrahim) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:02:37 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Suggestions for the next PyCon In-Reply-To: (Anand Chitipothu's message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:52:21 +0530") References: <20130908083053.GA28353@gmail.com> Message-ID: <8738om98ne.fsf@sanitarium.localdomain> Anand Chitipothu writes: [...] >> * Schedule printed on a sheet small enough to carry. We had a large >> pouch for the ID card. If the schedule was printed small enough to >> fit in there, that'd have been incredibly useful. I know this is >> challenging enough with last minute changes, but just a thought. >> > > That came up even this year, but we didn't have time to work on it. > Possible option for next year. I like the idea of custom badges printed along with temporary visiting cards and maybe a schedule per participant. It'll be expensive with printer ink and what not but might be worth considering. [...] -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in From jace at pobox.com Mon Sep 30 09:15:14 2013 From: jace at pobox.com (Kiran Jonnalagadda) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:45:14 +0530 Subject: [Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Abhishek Mishra wrote: > It's very hard, or maybe wrong to compare community driven, controlled, > event like PyCon India with such examplers and then decide if the prices > should go north or what policy should be followed. > Abhishek, you may have missed the context -- it's not about whether these conferences are worth the money (which I believe they are). It's about whether a discount is justified given PyCon India's already low prices. Kiran -- Kiran Jonnalagadda http://jace.zaiki.in http://hasgeek.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: