[group-organizers] Please change this list to have public archives

[sheila miguez]

I'm +1 since other organizer groups do it and because there isn't years
worth of private history. In mailing lists with years worth of private
history, I'd be -1.

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Brian Ray <brianhray at gmail.com> wrote:

> -1
>
> I am not sure I agree with the change in the setting for group organizers
> as we may want to discuss things we (as group organizers) want to discuss
> with other group organizers before proposing to a public forum. However, I
> would love to hear what others think.
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:32 AM, sheila miguez <shekay at pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> I've wanted to provide links to posts for people multiple times now, and
>> can't.
>>
>> --
>> shekay at pobox.com
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/private/group-organizers/attachments/20150730/e8a14f4e/attachment.html
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Group-Organizers mailing list
>> Group-Organizers at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/group-organizers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Brian Ray
> @brianray
> (773) 669-7717
>



-- 
shekay at pobox.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/private/group-organizers/attachments/20150730/5b4b231c/attachment.html>