From sunfinite at gmail.com  Fri Nov  8 08:12:42 2013
From: sunfinite at gmail.com (Sunny K.)
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 12:42:42 +0530
Subject: [Email-SIG] Implementing RFCs 2387 and 2392
Message-ID: <CAHT-KCq1T9o-nW1xWgmtqq=cg0=DsGtQE5HREWAd904CiZ8S1Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hey,

Are issues 634412[1] and 626452[2] still valid? I would like to work on
them. Advice or caveats on how to work on them would be helpful.

[1] http://bugs.python.org/issue634412
[2] http://bugs.python.org/issue626452

Thank You.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/email-sig/attachments/20131108/7a837f75/attachment.html>

From sunfinite at gmail.com  Mon Nov 11 09:43:25 2013
From: sunfinite at gmail.com (Sunny K.)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:13:25 +0530
Subject: [Email-SIG] Fwd: Implementing RFCs 2387 and 2392
In-Reply-To: <CAHT-KCq1T9o-nW1xWgmtqq=cg0=DsGtQE5HREWAd904CiZ8S1Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHT-KCq1T9o-nW1xWgmtqq=cg0=DsGtQE5HREWAd904CiZ8S1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHT-KCraA4ZzhHz_H4hP3igiY6nPreQtqGP96KfvruOAULMXCw@mail.gmail.com>

Resending.  The first mail does not seem to have gotten through.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sunny K. <sunfinite at gmail.com>
Date: 8 November 2013 12:42
Subject: Implementing RFCs 2387 and 2392
To: email-sig at python.org


Hey,

Are issues 634412[1] and 626452[2] still valid? I would like to work on
them. Advice or caveats on how to work on them would be helpful.

[1] http://bugs.python.org/issue634412
[2] http://bugs.python.org/issue626452

Thank You.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/email-sig/attachments/20131111/448f7a22/attachment.html>

From rdmurray at bitdance.com  Mon Nov 11 17:59:26 2013
From: rdmurray at bitdance.com (R. David Murray)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:59:26 -0500
Subject: [Email-SIG] Fwd: Implementing RFCs 2387 and 2392
In-Reply-To: <CAHT-KCraA4ZzhHz_H4hP3igiY6nPreQtqGP96KfvruOAULMXCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHT-KCq1T9o-nW1xWgmtqq=cg0=DsGtQE5HREWAd904CiZ8S1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHT-KCraA4ZzhHz_H4hP3igiY6nPreQtqGP96KfvruOAULMXCw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20131111165927.7869425007F@webabinitio.net>

On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:13:25 +0530, "Sunny K." <sunfinite at gmail.com> wrote:
> Resending.  The first mail does not seem to have gotten through.

I got it, perhaps it was held for moderation initially.

> Are issues 634412[1] and 626452[2] still valid? I would like to work on
> them. Advice or caveats on how to work on them would be helpful.
> 
> [1] http://bugs.python.org/issue634412
> [2] http://bugs.python.org/issue626452

Yes these issues are still valid.  The implementation of them will be
(should be?) affected by the changes that just landed in the provisional
email package code.

In particular, the new code does contains some support that is directed
at rfc 2387.  Full support, as I currently envision it, involves a
contentmanager that will turn a related into a dictionary object indexed
by cid, and vice versa.

The way I have this currently planned, any such support should go
into a content manager released first as a third party library on pypi.
The contentmanager code itself is still fresh, and won't leave provisional
status until 3.5.  If an enhanced content manager exists on pypi before
then, it might be a candidate for inclusion as provisional in 3.5,
depending on what the "state of play" looks like by that point.

So, take a look at the new content manager code and the RFCs, and let us
know your thoughts or questions.  It is quite possible there is still
some necessary infrastructure that is missing in the 3.4 email package
code that will be discovered by implementing this support, and if so it
would be nice to fix that in 3.5.

--David

From mark at msapiro.net  Mon Nov 11 18:24:47 2013
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:24:47 -0800
Subject: [Email-SIG] Fwd: Implementing RFCs 2387 and 2392
In-Reply-To: <CAHT-KCraA4ZzhHz_H4hP3igiY6nPreQtqGP96KfvruOAULMXCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHT-KCq1T9o-nW1xWgmtqq=cg0=DsGtQE5HREWAd904CiZ8S1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHT-KCraA4ZzhHz_H4hP3igiY6nPreQtqGP96KfvruOAULMXCw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <528112DF.5060002@msapiro.net>

On 11/11/2013 12:43 AM, Sunny K. wrote:
> Resending.  The first mail does not seem to have gotten through.


See the Mailman FAQ article at <http://wiki.list.org/x/2IA9>.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan