[Email-SIG] fixing the current email module
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Mon Oct 12 22:18:32 CEST 2009
On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:20 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> IMO, the appropriate way for the email package to provide the API you
> are talking about is it provide the client with a way to get at the
> raw
> byte string, which I think everyone agrees on. If the client wants to
> decode it as if it were latin-1 to process it, it can then do that.
I agree. I'm running out of time to participate in this lengthy
thread, but I just wanted to say that of the 3 accessors (raw,
transport-decoded, fully-decoded) I'm not sure transport-decoded is
all that interesting. I wouldn't support it directly in the API. I
think they library's clients are mostly going to be interested in raw
or fully-decoded values, and there will be plenty of library utilities
to get from raw to transport-decoded if they really want it.
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/email-sig/attachments/20091012/fee315a5/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Email-SIG
mailing list