[Edu-sig] Python for math teachers (Google videos)
Arthur
ajsiegel at optonline.net
Sat Jan 27 01:21:52 CET 2007
kirby urner wrote:
>
> The *sounds* modest, yes, plus leaves you free to critique any actual
> implementation of a perspective as immodest. Calling for perspective
> isn't really doing any work, is just being modest. *Providing*
> perspectives
> is the name of the game.
PyGeo is interesting work.
My efforts to assist in provding VPython a future(lead actually, since
no one else has stepped up to the plate) is important work.
Immodest enough for you. Feel better.
>
> Yet when I teach kids in this age group this stuff, mixed with a lot of
> math,
> they often clamor for more (as do their parents, others guardians -- one of
> the dads sat through much of my last class actually).
My intuition is that you are an excellent and intuitive teacher. Don't
know for sure.
>
> Geek culture is like a missing ingredient in their diet. Geek culture
> seems
> *good* in at least *small* doses. But right now, it's still *no* doses,
> pretty
> much across the board. Just a lot of stereotyping, misleading TV and
> movies.
>
> And I dislike it surrounding the pontificating used to justify Algebra
> I, Algebra II,
> Geometry, Pre-calc, Calc (in whatever order), all undisturbed fossils
> for the ages,
> no chance of any Python unless we jump through stupid hoops proving over
> and
> over we're not just full of snake oil (got some __ribs__ in here too).
So much of the Grand Fallooning sounds like snake oil and *is* snake
oil, that particularly those trained in mathematics - in the art of
plausibility - will react, and over-react.
We agree about everything, except that we disagree about everything as well.
Art
More information about the Edu-sig
mailing list