[docs] [issue15457] consistent treatment of generator terminology

[Chris Jerdonek]

Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

This slipped under my radar.  After starting work on this again, I realize that it would make sense to complete issue 15476 first.  The reason is that it would improve the process of referencing "code object" in the generator docs (Terry's suggestion) once "code object" is itself properly documented.

----------
dependencies: +Add "code object" to glossary

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15457>
_______________________________________