[docs] [issue12188] PEP 7, C style: add ++ policy and explanation
Antoine Pitrou
report at bugs.python.org
Tue Jun 7 14:02:53 CEST 2011
Antoine Pitrou <pitrou at free.fr> added the comment:
> If there are a few of these idioms, I'm not against adding a new
> section to PEP 7 (something like the "Programming Recommendations"
> section in the PEP 8). It's just not worth doing it for the "*p++ =
> x;" idiom alone IMHO.
If these are recommandations, perhaps we should put them in the devguide
instead?
But I agree that it's not worth doing it only for "*p++" anyway.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12188>
_______________________________________
More information about the docs
mailing list