[docs] Typo in io.rst and meta-question about patches workflow

[Georg Brandl]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 01.05.2010 20:48, schrieb Éric Araujo:
> Hello everyone
> 
> 
> In trunk’s Doc/library/io.rst, a change from IOError to ValueError has
> left a stray “an”:
> 
> --- Doc/library/io.rst	Sat May 01 14:16:39 2010 +0200
> +++ Doc/library/io.rst	Sat May 01 15:26:32 2010 +0200
> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@
> -      (e.g. reading or writing) will raise an :exc:`ValueError`.
> +      (e.g. reading or writing) will raise a :exc:`ValueError`.
> 
> 
> Is it ok to use the mailing list instead of the bug tracker for such
> tiny patches? Apart from Georg, are there people with commit power on
> the list? Do they prefer emails or bug reports? Should we wait until
> we’ve collected a bunch of typo before reporting them instead of doing
> it one message per found typo?

There are a few, but most are inactive.  Still, reporting each typo is
fine.

Georg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkvof8kACgkQN9GcIYhpnLCzmgCeIiWoSLPX3nA0TTWmK6fuAPMZ
1FEAoKEkYwhwL1glnF8ppbrJRnbETqC8
=JgXw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----