[DOC-SIG] Python Library Reference in new HTML form
Fred L. Drake
Fred L. Drake, Jr." <fdrake@acm.org
Wed, 18 Mar 1998 09:37:38 -0500 (EST)
Laurence Tratt writes:
> But Strong is generally just Bold... The concern was over font size.
> I tend to think of font size as something of last resort... I'm
Yes; the intent of my solution was to avoid dealing with the font
size at all. ;-)
> It is quite confusing... There's anydbm and dumbdm, but I don't think
> there's any others... Quite a few lib*.tex files document more than
> one module within them, but that doesn't seem like a problem to me,
The number of modules per .tex file should be entirely irrelevant,
but those which describe more than one, with the UserDict/UserList and
anydbm/dumbdbm exceptions, still use one \section{} for each module.
That's where the problem creeps in.
> I don't think I'd include it by default... It would be intimidating
> to novice users and a great deal of other users. Python does not need
> to be seen by the outside world to be "just another difficult to
> learn, technically minded language". But it could be an option if
Sounds good.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
fdrake@cnri.reston.va.us
Corporation for National Research Initiatives
1895 Preston White Drive Reston, VA 20191
_______________
DOC-SIG - SIG for the Python Documentation Project
send messages to: doc-sig@python.org
administrivia to: doc-sig-request@python.org
_______________