[Distutils] Where should I put tests when packaging python modules?
Ionel Cristian Mărieș
contact at ionelmc.ro
Wed Oct 7 18:29:26 CEST 2015
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Erik Bray <erik.m.bray at gmail.com> wrote:
> Which, incidentally, is a great reason for installable tests :)
>
Not really. Doesn't matter where you have the tests. It matters where you
have the code being tested.
Tests being installed is a mere consequence of the location of tests.
> Running in the source tree is great for development. But when
> preparing a release it's great to be able to create an sdist, install
> that into a virtualenv, and run `package.test()` or `python -m
> package.tests` or whatever. Occasionally catches problems with the
> source dist if nothing else.
>
As I said, I like the idea. It's just that it's not feasible right now.
Lets go over the issues again:
* Tests too bulky (pyca/cryptography)
* Tests can't be installed at all:
https://github.com/getpelican/pelican/issues/1409
* Not clear how to install test dependencies. tests_require? extras? no
deps? What about version conflicts and way too many deps being installed.
Dependencies are like cars, they are very useful but too many of them
create problems.
* Real problems like standardized test output or run protocol are not
solved at all. Little benefit of doing it like this if you can't build good
CI tools around this.
* Workflows are under-specified. User are not guided to make quality
releases on PyPI.
Maybe we should have a PEP that would specify/propose some concrete
solutions to all those?
Thanks,
-- Ionel Cristian Mărieș, http://blog.ionelmc.ro
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20151007/02f0d20c/attachment.html>
More information about the Distutils-SIG
mailing list