[DB-SIG] Two-phase commit API proposal (was Re: Any standard for two phase commit APIs?)

[Dieter Maurer]

M.-A. Lemburg wrote at 2008-1-22 13:42 +0100:
> ...
>We could just describe the transaction id as object in the spec and
>then have the modules decide what type this maps to, e.g. one module
>might want to use a tuple (or even namedtuple) for this, another
>might not want to bother at all and use the internal representation
>mapped to a string or bytes object.

I learned (from James remark) that transaction ids belong to the
transaction manager and not the resource.

Thus, at least the individual "drivers" should not use different
implementations for transaction ids.



-- 
Dieter