[Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

[Vitja Makarov]

2011/7/30 Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml at behnel.de>:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder what we should do with Vitja's CyFunction branch. He mentioned
> issues with it in the past (I remember that there was one specific changeset
> that he considered questionable), and it seems that we found several ways to
> extend the function support beyond that, which may have an impact on the
> current way it's implemented.
>
> Is this something that makes sense to be included in 0.15, or should it wait
> to get stable and further extended before being merged?
>
> It appears to me that there are reasons for one and the other. However,
> given that we plan to drop support for (at least) Python 2.3 after this
> release, I feel that we should try to get out a version that doesn't require
> much fixing and maintenance. Changing the implementation of functions at
> this point seems like a rather deep cut. If we agree that it's in a state
> that we feel comfortable with, I wouldn't object to merging it. Otherwise,
> I'd suggest to wait until after the release.
>
> Comments?
>

That's not such a big change, CyFunction replcaces old
PyCFunction_binding type and shouldn't break anything.


-- 
vitja.