[Cryptography-dev] KBKDFCMAC review

[Krzysztof Jackiewicz/Security (PLT) /SRPOL/Engineer/삼성전자]

Thanks for the info. I can only tell that I use it to integrate with a closed system with limited crypto that only supports KBKDFCMAC.

Krzysiek

-----Original Message-----
From: Cryptography-dev <cryptography-dev-bounces+k.jackiewicz=samsung.com at python.org> On Behalf Of Paul Kehrer
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 2:46 PM
To: cryptography-dev at python.org
Subject: Re: [Cryptography-dev] KBKDFCMAC review

We'll review it as soon as we have bandwidth, thanks for the contribution. What's your use case for KBKDFCMAC by the way?

-Paul

On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 3:36 AM Krzysztof Jackiewicz/Security (PLT) /SRPOL/Engineer/삼성전자 <k.jackiewicz at samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My PR 
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=2398fd4c-7c03c44e-23997603-0cc47a312ab0-201701d7e207433a&q=1&e=34969df5-3e2d-4f09-a4ff-0c2ddf5670f9&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpyca%2Fcryptography%2Fpull%2F6181 has finally passed all the checks. Is there anything else I should do initiate the review?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Krzysiek
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cryptography-dev mailing list
> Cryptography-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
_______________________________________________
Cryptography-dev mailing list
Cryptography-dev at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev