[C++-sig] Re: Re: Boost.Python: few thoughts and questions...

[Mike Rovner]

"Nicodemus" <nicodemus at globalite.com.br> wrote in message
news:3EEA43AF.1040405 at globalite.com.br...
> David Abrahams wrote:
> >>Pyste does not export the base's member functions in the derived
> >>class. If the user wants functions from the base class, he should
> >>export the base class too. Perhaps this behaviour should change?
> >Often base class partitioning is merely an implementation detail.  It
> >seems to me that if public bases are not explicitly exported they
> >should be exported implicitly, unless explicitly suppressed.
> It is certainly do-able, we just have to decide if this feature is
> wanted or not. Opinions, everyone?

It will be nice to have.

I still do all wrapping by hand, so to move to pyste it's a must be feature
for me.

Mike